US prison system proposes total social media ban for inmates, sparking First Amendment concerns

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
56,112
Reputation
8,239
Daps
157,806

US prison system proposes total social media ban for inmates, sparking First Amendment concerns​


Activists call the proposal "archaic and so inhumane"​

By Rob Thubron April 2, 2024 at 9:18 AM 35 comments


US prison system proposes total social media ban for inmates, sparking First Amendment concerns

Serving tech enthusiasts for over 25 years.

TechSpot means tech analysis and advice you can trust.

A hot potato: Should incarcerated individuals be allowed to use social media? The US federal prison system has proposed a change in its rules that would see prisoners who use these platforms punished. Even directing others to establish and use social media accounts on their behalf would be prohibited in some cases. Civil liberties advocates say this would infringe on the First Amendment rights of people both in and out of prison.

The federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) earlier this year proposed a rule change that makes accessing, using, or maintaining social media accounts by prisoners a high-severity-level prohibited act considered to be on the same scale as fighting, blackmail, extortion, and bribery.

Federal inmates are already banned from using cell phones and restricted from accessing the Internet, Reuters reports.

The BOP argues that if an inmate's Facebook account were being operated to convey content from the inmate himself, it would open the door to them communicating with a virtually unlimited number of individuals, including affiliated gang members and the victims of their crimes.




Inmates' rights advocacy groups say that the rule would restrict the First Amendment rights of not only prisoners but also people who are not in BOP custody. Ebony Underwood, whose nonprofit We Got Us Now works with the children of incarcerated parents, called the social media proposal "archaic and so inhumane."

"Social media has been an avenue for so many young people in my community to be able to advocate for our parents," she added.

Advocates say that the rules could stop people from making posts about inmates in case it leads to a serious punishment such as a longer prison term, solitary confinement, or a deduction of good time credits.

A separate part of the proposed rule change would enable the Bureau to target and eliminate inmates' use of fund transfer services like CashApp. When inmates use these services to send and receive money, Bureau staff are unable to monitor the transfers due to the platforms' use of encryption.

Back in 2021, it was discovered that Facebook was testing an app that helps prisoners transition back into society. We've heard little else about the Re-Entry app since then, though there are other apps that offer similar services.
 

Belize King

I got concepts of a plan.
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
2,994
Reputation
1,040
Daps
9,880
I struggle with the purpose of prison. If its true intention is to separate those who commit crime against society, they should have access to everything while in there.

Is it purpose to rehabilitate our brothers and sisters who took a wrong turn in life? They should have access to schooling, mental health, drug rehab etc.

If its purpose is to punish the dregs of society I guess their liberties should be stripped.

We know why our incarceration population is high, but nobody cares. We have too much to worry about on the outside to care about people who “put themselves” in that situation.

That said, murderers and rapist unfortunately would benefit from whatever prison reform that happens.
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
56,112
Reputation
8,239
Daps
157,806
White people struggle to discern the difference between prisoners and slaves.
You can punish people for crimes without stripping them of all their rights and trying to profit for free off their labor.

legally they are slaves. :francis:



 
Last edited:

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
56,112
Reputation
8,239
Daps
157,806
Why are prisoners having access to communications??? I thought that was a no no..:jbhmm:

do you think taking communication access away from prisoners will increase the the abuses that occur in prisons or decrease them?
 

Diondon

Thanks to the lawyers uh, I marbled the foyer
Joined
Mar 19, 2013
Messages
38,535
Reputation
8,222
Daps
172,214
Reppin
Somewhere tropic...
Its a 1st Amendment right to be on IG looking at thots :skip:
Wouldn't that mean having a phone :aicmon:
Let prisoners send hits from jail, brehs
 

Dzali OG

Dz Ali OG...Pay me like you owe me!
Joined
May 23, 2012
Messages
14,829
Reputation
2,533
Daps
41,085
Reppin
Duval Florida
Umm I work in prison, how tf they on social media? Cellphones prohibited and their tablets don't have access.

I actually think prisons just don't want them to possibly show the world what they actually live thru.
 

Fiji Water

Every moment is an opportunity
Joined
Dec 12, 2019
Messages
3,381
Reputation
743
Daps
12,131
Reppin
Harlem
White people struggle to discern the difference between prisoners and slaves.
You can punish people for crimes without stripping them of all their rights and trying to profit for free off their labor.
Uhhh... What? Conceptually, violating your social contract comes with a penalty of slavery. Sheriffs and slave catchers wore the same badge. You joking or uninformed, breh?

:dwillhuh:

Being convicted of a high level offense literally means you are stripped of your rights and dignity in this society. It's always been that way. The only amendment stopping that is cruel and unusual punishment. Limiting your access to the outside world while being imprisoned is not exactly unusual.
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
56,112
Reputation
8,239
Daps
157,806
i'm pretty sure you don't have first amendment rights in jail. losing access to instagram would seem like one of the consequences for robbing or killing

no, the government saying you can't relay messages to people you're authorized to speak with in-person on or phones monitored by the prison is infringing on their 1st amendment rights.
 
Top