Ubuntu 17.10 PULLED: Linux OS knackers laptop BIOSes, Intel kernel driver fingered

morris

Superstar
Joined
Oct 8, 2014
Messages
16,330
Reputation
4,875
Daps
35,828
Free as in thank God I'm not paying for this
By Shaun Nichols and Chris Williams
shutterstock_laptop_hit.jpg

Updated Canonical has halted downloads of Ubuntu Linux 17.10, aka Artful Aardvark, from its website after punters complained installing the open-source OS on laptops knackered the machines.

Specifically, the desktop flavor of Artful Aardvark, released in October, has been temporarily pulled – the server builds and other editions remain available. A corrected version of 17.10 for desktops is due to be released soon.

"The download of Ubuntu 17.10 is currently discouraged due to an issue on certain Lenovo laptops," the Linux distro maker noted this week on its desktop download page. "Once fixed this download will be enabled again."

Installing 17.10 on Lenovo Yoga and IdeaPad laptops prevents the motherboard's BIOS from saving its settings, and while the computer will hopefully continue to start up, it potentially stops the machine from booting via USB.

The cockup mainly affects Lenovo computers, although other systems may also fall foul: selected Acer, HP, Toshiba and Dell hardware are said to be hit, too.

A fault report on Canonical's bug tracker tells it all – apparently, Artful Aardvark's Linux kernel includes an Intel SPI driver that was not ready for release:

Many users are reporting issues with BIOS corruption with 17.10. This seems to stem from enabling the intel-spi-* drivers in the kernel, which don't appear to be ready for use on end-user machines."

Intel did not respond to our request for comment. The bug report – which includes a list of known vulnerable hardware – continued:

Basically, on Lenovo Y50-70 after installing Ubuntu 17.10, many users reported a corrupted BIOS.

It's not possible to save new settings in BIOS anymore and after rebooting, the system starts with the old settings. Moreover (and most important) USB booting is not possible anymore since USB is not recognized. It's very serious, since our machines do not have a CDROM.

Lenovo forums at the moment are full of topics regarding this issue.

Intel's SPI driver is a piece of kernel-level software that allows the operating system to access and rewrite the firmware's flash storage on the motherboard via a serial communication interface.

Seemingly, a gremlin within this code causes the firmware's data to become write protected, triggering further failures. This could be caused by the OS accidentally flipping the wrong hardware control register bit, or hitting a bug in the BIOS. The Ubuntu team is still investigating the issue with Lenovo.

We're told Canonical will remove the SPI driver from its kernel, and rerelease Artful Aardvark. The driver is not normally built nor included in the standard default Linux kernel, from what we can tell: its documentation warns you to stay away from it "unless you know what you are doing. Overwriting the SPI flash may render the system unbootable."

If your BIOS is already affected by this blunder, you may have to replace the firmware's flash memory chip – or the whole motherboard – if reseting the BIOS or this suggested workaround, or some other remedy, do not resolve the matter.

Essentially, you have to remove the motherboard firmware's write protection, one way or another, in order to restore control of the BIOS. We'll let you know as soon as we can any confirmed steps to rescue BIOS-locked machines.

"We have been made aware that a few users have experienced this and we are talking to Lenovo about it," a spokesperson for Canonical told The Register on Wednesday.

Meanwhile, folks with knackered systems aren't, as you can imagine, happy.

"I removed the battery and BIOS battery. Then pressed the power button. BIOS settings stay the same and I still cannot change them," one Lenovo laptop owner complained in the manufacturer's support forum.

This wouldn't be the first time a bad Ubuntu update has caused havoc for Linux users. Earlier this year, an upgrade caused the DNS resolver on some machines to go haywire.

Least the Linux fanbois think we're picking on them, it should also be noted that Apple and Microsoft have caused their own headaches for users with bad software releases recently.

A stunning security lapse in High Sierra left many Macs open to intrusion, while the October edition of Windows' Patch Tuesday gave some machines recurring Blue Screens of Death. ®

Updated to add
A spokesperson for Intel has been in touch to say the chipmaker is aware of the BIOS cockup triggered by installing Ubuntu Linux 17.10. "We’re actively working with Ubuntu to ensure the issue is corrected," she said. "This is a unique issue based on non-Intel recommended changes made to the BIOS configurations by Ubuntu."
 

The Intergalactic Koala

Reporting for Duty
Supporter
Joined
Jan 2, 2017
Messages
58,921
Reputation
20,787
Daps
241,869
Reppin
Koalabama and the Cosmos
I remember riding the Ubuntu/linux wave but realize that there's two reasons of having the OS::

  • Extra security
  • Having a vendetta against Microsoft
Beyond those two factors, it's really not worth the curiosity :ld:. Especially with goofed up problems such as this.
 

PikaDaDon

Thunderbolt Them Suckers
Joined
Oct 13, 2012
Messages
9,361
Reputation
2,345
Daps
25,316
Reppin
NULL
I remember riding the Ubuntu/linux wave but realize that there's two reasons of having the OS::

  • Extra security
  • Having a vendetta against Microsoft
Beyond those two factors, it's really not worth the curiosity :ld:. Especially with goofed up problems such as this.

Calm down.

1) The Windows OS gets a ton of problems too and we have to wait for Microsoft to patch them. While with Linux, an open source operating system, you have a community a hobbyist programmers who fix the problems in their free time.
2) Ubuntu is just one flavor of linux. There are others out there managed by different people (Linux Mint, Arch, etc.)
 
Last edited:

TLR Is Mental Poison

The Coli Is Not For You
Supporter
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
46,178
Reputation
7,463
Daps
105,780
Reppin
The Opposite Of Elliott Wilson's Mohawk
I remember riding the Ubuntu/linux wave but realize that there's two reasons of having the OS::

  • Extra security
  • Having a vendetta against Microsoft
Beyond those two factors, it's really not worth the curiosity :ld:. Especially with goofed up problems such as this.
At one point, all the computers in my house except my wife's laptop were on Ubuntu. When Adobe dropped Flash support everything cascaded back to Windows. Having to go to the prompt to set up WiFi and windows shares :snoop: Awful OS. Windows works and doesn't cost much
 

The Intergalactic Koala

Reporting for Duty
Supporter
Joined
Jan 2, 2017
Messages
58,921
Reputation
20,787
Daps
241,869
Reppin
Koalabama and the Cosmos
At one point, all the computers in my house except my wife's laptop were on Ubuntu. When Adobe dropped Flash support everything cascaded back to Windows. Having to go to the prompt to set up WiFi and windows shares :snoop: Awful OS. Windows works and doesn't cost much

I remember putting Ubuntu on me and my wife's old PC because it was slow as all hell. Them constant updates and bugs:scust:. I know Windows is crap at times but Ubuntu is a whole different beast of frustration. Especially downloading things that you need to get media files and other things up and running:dwillhuh:
 

TLR Is Mental Poison

The Coli Is Not For You
Supporter
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
46,178
Reputation
7,463
Daps
105,780
Reppin
The Opposite Of Elliott Wilson's Mohawk
Oh god, yea the constant updates. I'm getting PTSD flashbacks :snoop:

I was pretty impressed with the amount of software out for it. I am somewhat of a power user so that was my biggest fear. But the shyt didn't work. For power users Windows is it and for casual users Chrome is the wave. Like you asked I'm really not sure who the hell Ubuntu is for. Masochists?
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
53,321
Reputation
8,032
Daps
151,993
Oh god, yea the constant updates. I'm getting PTSD flashbacks :snoop:

I was pretty impressed with the amount of software out for it. I am somewhat of a power user so that was my biggest fear. But the shyt didn't work. For power users Windows is it and for casual users Chrome is the wave. Like you asked I'm really not sure who the hell Ubuntu is for. Masochists?

What exactly didn't work for you? I'd consider myself a power user before i started using linux and it's been fantastic overall not without its faults but Windows wasn't a breeze either.
 
Top