U.S. Explodes Atomic Bombs Near Beers To See If They Are Safe To Drink

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
88,186
Reputation
3,616
Daps
157,210
Reppin
Brooklyn
U.S. Explodes Atomic Bombs Near Beers To See If They Are S... U.S. Explodes Atomic Bombs Near Beers To See If They Are Safe To Drink : Krulwich Wonders... : NPR...
Krulwich Wonders...
U.S. Explodes Atomic Bombs Near Beers To See If They Are Safe To Drink
09:42 am
September 19, 2012 by ROBERT KRULWICH
So you're minding your own business when all of a sudden, a nuclear bomb goes off, there's a shock wave, fires all around, general destruction and you, having somehow survived, need a drink. What can you do? There is no running water, not where you are. But there is a convenience store. It's been crushed by the shock wave, but there are still bottles of beer, Coke and diet soda intact on the floor.
So you wonder: Can I grab one of those beers and gulp it down? Or is it too radioactive? And what about taste? If I drink it, will it taste OK?
This could happen, no? Not to everybody, but let's say it happens to you. Have you been wondering what to do?

Well, wonder no longer.
National Technical Information Service via Alex Wellerstein
Thanks to my friend, science historian Alex Wellerstein, we are now in possession of a 1957 U.S. government study called "The Effect of Nuclear Explosions on Commercially Packaged Beverages," which addresses this very question: After the bomb, can I drink the beer?
Written by three executives from Can Manufacturers Institute and the Glass Container Manufacturers Institute for the Federal Civil Defense Administration, they say that after placing cans and bottles of soda and beer next to an actual atomic explosion, after measuring subsequent radioactivity and after actual taste tests, go ahead: Grab that can, pop it open, and drink away. "These beverages could be used as potable water sources for immediate emergency purposes as soon as the storage area is safe to enter after a nuclear explosion."
If you can make it to the store, you can drink. How do they know this?
Well, in 1956, the Atomic Energy Commission exploded two bombs, one "with an energy release equivalent to 20 kilotons of TNT," the other 30 kilotons, a test site in Nevada. Bottles and cans were carefully placed various distances from ground zero. Notice, on this list, some of them are "returnable". The closest containers were placed "less than a quarter mile away," says Alex, "a mere 1,056 feet", the outliers a couple of miles off. Some were buried, some left in batches, others were placed side by side. These images, copied from a bad photocopies, are in the report. The cans, as you can see, survived.

Lots of bottles survived too. Some were shattered by flying debris, fell off shelves, or got crushed by collapsing materials, but a surprising number stayed intact.
Will the beer be radioactive?
As for radiation, they checked, and found that bottles closest to ground zero were indeed radioactive, but only mildly so. Exposure, the authors say, "did not carry over to the contents." The sodas and beer were "well within the permissible limits for emergency use", which means, says Alex, "It won't hurt you in the short term."
Will it taste good?
But what about taste? Post-bomb beer might not poison you, but will it keep its flavor?
The report says, "Immediate taste tests," (gotta wonder who got that job), "indicated that the beverages, both beer and soft drinks, were still of commercial quality, although there was evidence of a slight flavor change in some of the products exposed at 1,270 feet from Ground Zero." The most blasted beers were "definitely off."

The first tasters then passed samples to selected laboratories for further testing, and this time the contents were rated "acceptable." So here's your government's considered advice: Should you find yourself near an atomic blast and run short of potable water, you can chug a Coke or a beer, but don't expect it to taste great.
What's the lesson here?
There's a second lesson here, Alex thinks. Because beverages in bottles and cans keep you safely hydrated in dire emergencies, it makes sense to keep a six-pack or two or three (or four), in the basement, just in case. What if there's no lootable convenience store conveniently close by?
"For me, the takeaway here is that the next time you find yourself stocking up on beer, remember, it's not just for the long weekend," he says. "It might be for the end of days."
If you want to see the government report, you can find it here. Alex Wellerstein's analysis "Beer and the Apocalypse" (which I used to write my story) appeared on his blog, Restricted Data.

diagrams photos in link
 

Mr. Somebody

Friend Of A Friend
Joined
May 10, 2012
Messages
28,262
Reputation
2,041
Daps
43,603
Reppin
Los Angeles
:sadbron: Why do we need to know this.

Fallout 3 had it all wrong. I guess the only thing rad about those roaches is how good they taste.

mmmmmmmmmm yum, roach, rad, friends. :gladbron:
 

daze23

Siempre Fresco
Joined
Jun 25, 2012
Messages
31,958
Reputation
2,692
Daps
44,030
lol this is how they're spending our tax dollars? :snoop:

you don't think the effects of nukes on beverages is valuable information?

anyway...

nukacolaadd.jpg
 

Brown_Pride

All Star
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
6,416
Reputation
785
Daps
7,887
Reppin
Atheist for Jesus
hanks to my friend, science historian Alex Wellerstein, we are now in possession of a 1957 U.S.
you keep relying on that dated "research"
THESE WERE THE SAME DUDES THAT WERE TELLING KIDS TO "DUCK AND COVER"

check the 3 minute time mark
 
Last edited by a moderator:

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
88,186
Reputation
3,616
Daps
157,210
Reppin
Brooklyn
I always thought the duck and cover thing was more psychological than anything
 

daze23

Siempre Fresco
Joined
Jun 25, 2012
Messages
31,958
Reputation
2,692
Daps
44,030
I always thought the duck and cover thing was more psychological than anything

pretty much. it gives people the sense that maybe they have a chance when facing impending doom
 

daze23

Siempre Fresco
Joined
Jun 25, 2012
Messages
31,958
Reputation
2,692
Daps
44,030
it's in spanish but you should get the point

I'll wait till we can confirm their findings with more modern technology is what my point is.

:what:

everything we know about nukes is because they did all those tests back then. in other words, most of the paranoia you have about nukes, comes from the results of those tests. for that matter, much of that testing is now banned, so don't hold your breath for 'modern tech' to confirm anything. and I really can't think of any modern tech that would help that anyway. it's a pretty basic experiment... that involves an atomic bomb
 
Top