Golayitdown
Veteran
that and "lol @ Kozlov going over to Edge's house for Christmas" were two of the GOAT
threads
Man we lost so many fukkin classics
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fad6f/fad6f36b458c1ca015e8005a40f6765d430353c8" alt="sadcam :sadcam: :sadcam:"
that and "lol @ Kozlov going over to Edge's house for Christmas" were two of the GOAT
threads
So not following the predetermined love/hate list means I'm a bad poster?
It's still real out here.
Keep the hate coming though.
Got me feeling like Cena in this bytch.
See you at the next thread bro.
Oh yeah,![]()
Or you can just say that I'm mad and keep going. I don't give a damn.![]()
But you do give a damn or else you wouldn't respond. Might be time to retire that retort from the internet, don't you think? : ld:
But the reason I use thesmiley is not just to
but because you really are
I use facts and observations. Many of you use emotions, exaggerations and insults. And that's because you stan these wrestlers like they are your best buds......or fathers
Thing is this; no one likes to be called out for biases and hypocrisy. I get that....but too bad. You got people here that count Bryan's YES chants as part of his overness but not Ryback. Why? Bryan would still be more over. Stillwhen it's pointed out though.
Sheamus doesn't get MEGA reactions on the mic, I concur. Neither does Bryan. People getwhen it's pointed out though. And I will admit that now Bryan is more over than Sheamus, especially when you add in the YES chants. But he does get a boost for being part of a hot story. But it works both ways, he makes the story that much better.
See, I'm not afraid to admit things like this. Many of you just don't want to point out flaws in things or wrestlers you like. I'm not.
So I must ask this; how do I go against the grain? I back up all my arguments. I at least some aspects of most wrestlers. Is it John Cena lol. I enjoy him because he makes grown men act like children. His character is bullocks beyond that quality.
So, back up your argument. Or will you conveniently not care for real now?![]()
So not following the predetermined love/hate list means I'm a bad poster?
It's still real out here.
Keep the hate coming though.
Got me feeling like Cena in this bytch.
See you at the next thread bro.
Oh yeah,![]()
Asking this question within the context of your response is comical. Honestly.
All I'm saying is this: Every time there's some event that you perceive to be upsetting to the "orthodox" IWC, you're always there with yoursmiley to say something about how pitiful we are for thinking that it wouldn't happen or emotionally investing ourselves in it or something. Every time. Whether you're self-aware enough to understand the flaws of your favorites or your hypocrisy is immaterial regarding this argument. You take something that should be harmless or good-natured fun to the point of obnoxiousness.
I'm just pointing out an observation, I really don't give a damn (TGO does this with a wrestler I actually DO like, and there are other posters in the same vein as you, but you're the only one who's everywhere on the board). You can ignore all of this and keep going for all I care.
Ironically, given the tone and force of your response, you could be the one seen asin this instance.
You have a long way to go before you reach Cena levels of evoking passionate responses, that's R=G.
You're more like Sheamus in a heavily smark city.
So not following the predetermined love/hate list means I'm a bad poster?
It's still real out here.
Keep the hate coming though.
Got me feeling like Cena in this bytch.
See you at the next thread bro.
Oh yeah,![]()
You have a long way to go before you reach Cena levels of evoking passionate responses, that's R=G.
You're more like Sheamus in a heavily smark city.