I think they’re going to try everything they can to get this done. Doesn’t matter if you’re illegal or not, sweeping entire neighborhoods and families up. Lots of people are saying they’ll just keep people in prison and just have them do labor camps. It’s going to be a bleak future.
Trump to declare national emergency & utilize U.S. military for mass deportation program
- Thread starter FAH1223
- Start date
i think they'll denaturalized entire families by accusing them of harboring an undocumented immigrant or providing material resources/money and then lying about it on their u.s citizenship application.
like someone was supporting or living with another undocumented person while applying for citizenship and that'll be the thread they pull for justifying removing families.
Chapter 2 - Grounds for Revocation of Naturalization
In general, a person is subject to revocation of naturalization on the following grounds: A. Person Procures Naturalization Illegally A person
www.uscis.gov
Last edited:
Thatrogueassdiaz
We're on the blood path now
I agree. He won't make it.Of course he's going to try and do it. It's also how he intends to stay president. He's going to claim that it's a state of emergency and he needs to be in charge to fix it.
Only way this piece of shyt is leaving the Whitehouse is in a body bag. He's about to fukk with the money of the agricultural and tech sector. I don't want anyone acting surprised if he has an unfortunate "accident" after making them lose millions of dollars.
Research reviewed by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office indicates that between 50 percent and 75 percent of unauthorized immigrants pay federal, state, and local taxes. Illegal immigrants are estimated to pay in about $7 billion per year into Social Security. In addition, they spend billions of dollars per year, which supports the US economy and helps to create new jobs. The Texas State Comptroller reported in 2006 that the 1.4 million unauthorized immigrants in Texas added almost $18 billion to the gross state product, and contributed $1.58 billion in state revenue, while costing the state about $1.16 billion in services used.
Economic impact of illegal immigration to the United States - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
Dear 70+ million retards who voted for this:
Don't believe this is a bluff. They've been planning this for a long time.
richaveli83
Veteran
We don't know how many illegal immigrants are in this country, where they live, who they are, etc. He'll have to federalize the National Guard to do this. That takes time, money, etc. It's not just pressing a button and magically a division pops up and starts roaming the streets. Let's not start with court cases from blue states and cities that won't comply or will challenge in court.
More than likely, it will be an uptick in deportations but a wall is not going to be built and there will still be illegal immigrants in this country. Trump knows this but he's relying on the idiot MAGA cultists not to even bother questioning him.
More than likely, it will be an uptick in deportations but a wall is not going to be built and there will still be illegal immigrants in this country. Trump knows this but he's relying on the idiot MAGA cultists not to even bother questioning him.
That's exactly what my dad told me is what he thinks will happen.i think they'll denaturalized entire families by accusing them of harboring an undocumented immigrant or providing material resources/money and then lying about it on their u.s citizenship application.
like someone was supporting or living with another undocumented person while applying for citizenship and that'll be the thread they pull for justifying removing families.
Chapter 2 - Grounds for Revocation of Naturalization
In general, a person is subject to revocation of naturalization on the following grounds: A. Person Procures Naturalization Illegally A personwww.uscis.gov
He thinks they'll go after Somalis who have come here more recently.
My mom has been freaking out over the denaturalization thing cause Stephen Miller's words are being amplified in Somali language social media and news. But my dad and her have been saying you've been a citizen for years, don't worry.
My dad got his citizenship over three decades ago himself.
much easier to go after the people who have been here less than two decades, i doubt they'll go as far back as the 80's but they want to remove as many non-whites as possible especially if they're of child bearing age or will be.
Yeah. My dad has been here since 1978. My mom since 1986. Both were really young and had privilege of varying degree and there were not many Somalis in the U.S. at the time. Both benefitted from Reagan signing the 1986 Immigration Act..
CashmereThoughts
Veteran
Some of them gambling on not getting caught.
They better carry guns and clap those ICE Agents. At least they will go down as heroes.
He has both houses of congress. You still think dude is playing by the rules. Someone of you are in for a rude awakening
I’m sure someone like Thomas can literally expand those definitions to include pretty much anyone.i think they'll denaturalized entire families by accusing them of harboring an undocumented immigrant or providing material resources/money and then lying about it on their u.s citizenship application.
like someone was supporting or living with another undocumented person while applying for citizenship and that'll be the thread they pull for justifying removing families.
Chapter 2 - Grounds for Revocation of Naturalization
In general, a person is subject to revocation of naturalization on the following grounds: A. Person Procures Naturalization Illegally A personwww.uscis.gov
Formerly Black Trash
Philosopher, Connoisseur, Future Legend
We about to lose some elite candy
just don't mess with the Dominicans and puerto ricans
He does not have enough of both houses to do it. Do you guys understand that the only thing they can do with only 51 votes is budgets. The rest requires more to be filibuster proof.
Seriously, you have a computer in front of you. Use it to look stuff up. If you are a US citizen, you should look up things before you decide to become fearful about it.
U.S. Senate: About Filibusters and Cloture
www.senate.gov
"That year, the Senate adopted a rule to allow a two-thirds majority to end a filibuster, a procedure known as "cloture." In 1975 the Senate reduced the number of votes required for cloture from two-thirds of senators voting to three-fifths of all senators duly chosen and sworn, or 60 of the 100 member Senate"