Trump ran on identity politics and won

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
60,081
Reputation
8,986
Daps
166,017

Trump ran on identity politics and won​


He united voters around shared grievances, not plans to solve their problems.​


Anna Gifty

Dec 04, 2024



A scene from the RNC in Milwaukee. (Andrew Harnik/Getty)



Trump’s reelection has prompted many to wonder, How did we get here again? One under-discussed factor is the role identity politics played in his campaign.

This might sound counterintuitive. Pundits, after all, have attributed Kamala Harris’s loss to identity politics, accusing her campaign of being too “woke” — a term that refers to any position intended to specifically benefit marginalized people.

In reality, Harris went to painstaking lengths to avoid campaigning on identity issues, including downplaying the significance of her possibly becoming the first woman president. Trump, by contrast, ran a campaign that associated Harris with the outgroups his supporters are united in despising — among them migrants, trans people, and anyone who spends time thinking about their pronouns.



Source: twitter

Trump kept his coalition together by stoking shared grievances. In this way, his presidential bid represented a type of inverted identity politics. He didn’t campaign on making life better for certain identity groups. He campaigned by mobilizing people against ones they loathe and fear.

Throughout his campaign, Trump proposed three core sets of policies that are steeped in this form of identity politics: mass deportation, law and order, and policing gender identity.

First, Trump championed stricter immigration policies, including mass deportations and completing a wall along the US-Mexico border, framing them as essential for keeping America safe and protecting jobs. These policies appealed directly to voters, both white and non-white, who view immigration as a threat to their economic and cultural status — recall Trump regularly talking about migrants purportedly “taking Black jobs.” This relentless fear-mongering was not just about security or economic concerns, but also about the reality of changing demographics.

Generation Z is the last majority-white generation in US history, with Latinos and Hispanic people steadily increasing their representation over time. The right has weaponized this shift to stoke fears among voters who believe immigration jeopardizes their standing. These appeals were mainly aimed at white voters, but they were also successful with people of color to the extent that Trump won Latino men.

Second, Trump emphasized “law and order,” frequently calling for the reinstatement of “stop and frisk” policies and advocating for police immunity, particularly in response to protests against police brutality and incidents of “migrant crime” he sensationalized at every opportunity. These appeals were aimed at voters who view racial justice movements like Black Lives Matter as destabilizing and/or are fearful of Black and brown people. Once again, the goal was to generate hysteria around a perceived threat to an existing social order.



A note from Aaron: Working with brilliant contributors like Anna takes resources. If you aren’t already a paid subscriber, please sign up to support our work.



Finally, Trump's campaign focused on gender identity with crude transphobia and by portraying Harris as a radical advocate for trans causes, even as she avoided talking about them on the campaign trail. Notably, Trump blanketed the airwaves with TV ads claiming "Kamala Harris is for they/them. I am for you." He regularly mocked transgender athletes at his rallies and vowed to "get transgender insanity the hell out of our schools, and we will keep men out of women’s sports." Harris may have tried to avoid engaging on this issue, but Trump forced it upon her and made it seem as though she was the one playing identity politics.

The reality is that none of this was about actually improving life circumstances for Trump’s identity coalition, or anyone else for that matter. Mass deportations, for example, will disrupt key sectors like agriculture and construction where immigrants make up a significant portion of the workforce. These disruptions could increase the cost of food and housing, both of which were among the reasons Trump won in the first place.

Evidence also shows that Trump’s proposed “law and order” policies are ineffective. Stop-and-frisk policies do not reduce crime or make communities safer (neither does police immunity). Trump’s attempts to campaign as a crime-fighter were absurd for many reasons, not the least of which is that crime has actually fallen since he left office in January 2021.

Along similar lines, Trump’s talking points about the country being in the throes of an occupation by violent migrants are a dystopian fantasy. From 1850 to 2020, immigrants actually had similar orlower incarceration rates than white men born in the US. In places like Texas, where the border is a major issue, both documented and undocumented immigrants have lower rates of offenses compared to US-born individuals.

Lastly, in an era of evolving gender identity and expression, it’s important to note that despite the uproar about trans people, they make up only about one percent of the American population. Anecdotal evidence from Minnesota shows that efforts to introduce gender-neutral bathrooms have actually made students feel safer.

The panic around trans people ignores the facts. Trans people are four times more likely to be victims of violent crime and are at greater risk of experiencing sexual assault and suicidal ideation. Everything anti-trans advocates fear might happen to them and their communities is already happening — at alarming rates — to trans people. That’s why not protecting trans people opens up the floodgates for harm to be done to anyone else in the name of “safety,” including women the right does not deem sufficiently “feminine.”

Trump spoke to his coalition’s fears, not their realities. He successfully masked policies that will harm his voters with a negative brand of identity politics. He won’t solve actual problems, but he will validate grievances.

As Trump rolls out his nightmarish cabinet nominees and resumes his chaos machine method of governing, his rhetoric continues to define "American" identity in the narrowest way possible. His vow to carry out mass deportations now comes with “no price tag” and his incoming border czar is talking about arresting Democratic officials who refuse to comply. His attacks on trans people have emboldened Republicans to call for the abolition of marriage equality and to make bigoted attacks on the first transgender person to be elected to Congress.

The MAGA playbook will remain the same: dividing, conquering, and pitting one group against another. It’s a terrible way to run the country, but as Trump just demonstrated, it’s still an effective way to win elections.
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
60,081
Reputation
8,986
Daps
166,017

Scustin Bieburr

Baby baybee baybee UUUGH
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
21,698
Reputation
11,227
Daps
125,239
Conservatives got a way of pointing the finger at Democrats for doing something and then doing the same thing but since the Dems are moderates they are stuck playing defense instead of calling out the hypocrisy of the Right
The playbook is very old.

Accused your opponent of doing something you want to do.

Do the thing you accuse them of doing. Nothing happens because you've successfully convinced the public that your opponent is worse than you so what you're doing isn't that bad by comparison.
 

2 Up 2 Down

Veteran
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
28,785
Reputation
2,980
Daps
69,906
Reppin
NULL
The playbook is very old.

Accused your opponent of doing something you want to do.

Do the thing you accuse them of doing. Nothing happens because you've successfully convinced the public that your opponent is worse than you so what you're doing isn't that bad by comparison.
You see it plain as day on this site.
 

feelosofer

#ninergang
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
49,133
Reputation
7,494
Daps
139,406
Reppin
Brick City, NJ
Yea it wasn't even that deep. Donald Trump ran on making America WHITE again and managing to convince a large swaths of minorities to either stay home or vote for Trump with the idea they can be model minorities. America chose facism as a sort of reverse New Deal.

The Republicans have played the long game and Donald Trump successfully galvanized all the disparate conservatives the Tech-Cons, the Evangelicals, Working class. What he did could be considered objectively impressive if it weren't so potentially detrimental to us long term. This is why the moderate Republicans stayed silent. Donald Trump is the most impactful republican since Ronald Reagan.
 

At30wecashout

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Sep 2, 2014
Messages
36,749
Reputation
18,623
Daps
168,869
I’ve been saying the same thing. Meanwhile, people lambaste dems if they believe they are running on identity but it was 100% Trumps platform. He offered them nothing tangible and won. Kamala gave examples of meaningful policy and lost. Ignoring voter suppression and fukker like that, its time to dead the policy argument. Even if a Democrat runs on good policy, if they don’t have the numbers to pass, said policy, when they make it in the office, democratic and independent voters tend, treated as them not fulfilling the promise. Republicans can run on identity things and as long as they say no to everything, their constituents are happy. It doesn’t make sense and it makes it so when actual good politicians making in office The context of why they did or did not do things doesn’t seem to matter to enough people.
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
60,081
Reputation
8,986
Daps
166,017
nikka, 3.6 million votes were purged. He didn't convince America of shyt. He's a treasonous bytch that should be hanging from a rope with a 24/7 live feed to watch him decompose in real time.


for context




















1/11

@Greg_Palast

If not for the mass purge of voters of color, and the mass disqualification of provisional and mail-in ballots, if not for the new mass vigilante challenges in swing states, Harris would have gained at least another 3,565,000 votes, topping Trump’s official tally by 1.2 million.











2/11

@Greg_Palast

As in Bush v. Gore in 2000, and in too many other miscarriages of Democracy, this election was determined by good old “vote suppression,” the polite term we use for shafting people of color out of their ballot. We used to call it Jim Crow. Trump Lost. Vote Suppression Won.







3/11

@Greg_Palast

In 2024, after an avalanche of new not-going-to-let-you-vote laws passed in almost every red state, the number of citizens Jim Crow’d out of their vote soared into the millions. Since 2020, according to @BrennanCenter, “At least 30 states enacted 78 restrictive laws.”











4/11

@Greg_Palast

The race-targeted laws ran the gamut from shuttering drop boxes in Black-majority cities to, for the first time, allowing non-government self-appointed “vote fraud vigilantes” to challenge voters by the hundreds of thousands.










5/11

@Greg_Palast

Throughout election seasons, the MSM write stories and editorials decrying vote suppression tactics — but, notably, they will never, ever say that these ugly racist attacks on voters changed the outcome of an election.







6/11

@Greg_Palast

If these vote suppression laws had no effect on election outcomes, then why did GOP legislators fight so hard to pass them? The answer is clear on the Brennan Center’s map of states that passed restrictive laws. It’s pretty much Trump’s victory map.











7/11

@Greg_Palast

Voting rights have never before been in such danger.

This is a moment of need for our nation. Please support our work and dig deep. And, if you do donate, we have books and films as a gift for your generosity.



▶️ Yes, I will help Rescue the 2026 Vote! | Palast Investigative Fund (Powered by Donorbox)



/search?q=#VotingRights = /search?q=#HumanRights







8/11

@su_z_t

I wish talking heads would stop saying "the voters wanted this" when in fact it was voter suppression that got Drump elected.







9/11

@PastorDScott

“rigged” huh?😆







10/11

@Wraga_here

Everyone remember this is total bullshyt! If you have an IQ over 34.5 please don’t fall for this grifter with a hat







11/11

@rlpage_insp

You appear to be /search?q=#electiondenier



I thought this was bad









To post tweets in this format, more info here: https://www.thecoli.com/threads/tips-and-tricks-for-posting-the-coli-megathread.984734/post-52211196



















1/9

@Greg_Palast

If not for the mass purge of voters of color, and the mass disqualification of provisional and mail-in ballots, if not for the new mass vigilante challenges in swing states, Harris would have gained at least another 3,565,000 votes, topping Trump’s official tally by 1.2 million.











2/9

@Greg_Palast

As in Bush v. Gore in 2000, and in too many other miscarriages of Democracy, this election was determined by good old “vote suppression,” the polite term we use for shafting people of color out of their ballot. We used to call it Jim Crow. Trump Lost. Vote Suppression Won.







3/9

@Greg_Palast

In 2024, after an avalanche of new not-going-to-let-you-vote laws passed in almost every red state, the number of citizens Jim Crow’d out of their vote soared into the millions. Since 2020, according to @BrennanCenter, “At least 30 states enacted 78 restrictive laws.”











4/9

@Greg_Palast

The race-targeted laws ran the gamut from shuttering drop boxes in Black-majority cities to, for the first time, allowing non-government self-appointed “vote fraud vigilantes” to challenge voters by the hundreds of thousands.










5/9

@Greg_Palast

Throughout election seasons, the MSM write stories and editorials decrying vote suppression tactics — but, notably, they will never, ever say that these ugly racist attacks on voters changed the outcome of an election.







6/9

@Greg_Palast

If these vote suppression laws had no effect on election outcomes, then why did GOP legislators fight so hard to pass them? The answer is clear on the Brennan Center’s map of states that passed restrictive laws. It’s pretty much Trump’s victory map.











7/9

@Greg_Palast

Voting rights have never before been in such danger.

This is a moment of need for our nation. Please support our work and dig deep. And, if you do donate, we have books and films as a gift for your generosity.



▶️ Yes, I will help Rescue the 2026 Vote! | Palast Investigative Fund (Powered by Donorbox)



/search?q=#VotingRights = /search?q=#HumanRights







8/9

@jecasey3

It always does. From both sides.







9/9

@jecasey3

Vote suppression is eternal and always done by both parties. Who ever is most skilled wins. Dems ran the worst campaign I have ever seen. Deserved to lose. And no, Trump did not deserve to win.









To post tweets in this format, more info here: https://www.thecoli.com/threads/tips-and-tricks-for-posting-the-coli-megathread.984734/post-52211196
 

At30wecashout

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Sep 2, 2014
Messages
36,749
Reputation
18,623
Daps
168,869
nikka, 3.6 million votes were purged. He didn't convince America of shyt. He's a treasonous bytch that should be hanging from a rope with a 24/7 live feed to watch him decompose in real time.
Even with 3.6 million people being purged, that’s still damn near 5 million short of who voted in 2020. It has been said, and a bunch of contrarians continue to ignore it: Democrats have to vote overwhelmingly due to how the system inherently works. You can win the popular vote, but if not enough people vote in the right states then you lose anyway. There was a goofy term called “too big to rig” that actually appropriately applies to 2024. If people got off their asses and voted like their lies, depending on it rather and moralizing or both siding, we would not have the son of a bytch in office right now.

That said it was absolutely their right to contribute to a Trump victory by not voting against him. Let people be butt hurt if they take that as an attack all they want.
 

BaggerofTea

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Sep 15, 2014
Messages
51,026
Reputation
-1,770
Daps
248,504
It's also why it's annoying when people attack the democrats for identity politics when it's clear the Republicans lean into it harder.
 
Top