Trump pledged to close the Education Department. What would that mean?

Diondon

Thanks to the lawyers uh, I marbled the foyer
Joined
Mar 19, 2013
Messages
39,267
Reputation
8,825
Daps
175,468
Reppin
Somewhere tropic...
Trump University byke
trump.gif
 

TRUEST

Superstar
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
14,623
Reputation
2,758
Daps
55,511
Reppin
NULL
It means free diplomas for every child that can read abc toward. And write it backwards. Next level sh1t
 

richaveli83

Veteran
Joined
Sep 10, 2015
Messages
54,944
Reputation
20,716
Daps
270,891
Reppin
Dallas, Texas but living in Houston, Texas
Republicans have been trying to get rid of the modern Department of Education(it's been in existence in some shape or form since the 1860s) since 1984 and they haven't been successful. At the most is it will be massively gutted which would definitely harm a lot of people.
 

DJ Hollywood

Rookie
Joined
Jan 17, 2014
Messages
75
Reputation
-25
Daps
92
He literally said he doesn’t want education to be funded by the federal government and instead education should be funded by the individual states.
 

AllHolosEve

Her Name Is Mistress Death
Supporter
Joined
Jun 29, 2012
Messages
9,255
Reputation
1,930
Daps
15,258
Reppin
SouthSide, MPLS
-I was talking to a teacher last week & she was telling me how the school district here has already been in communication with a school district in another state about this. Apparently the school boards are coming together to prepare for massive cuts & trying to unite to fight this.
 

Solo_87

All Star
Joined
Jul 3, 2018
Messages
1,928
Reputation
134
Daps
3,672
Worst case scenario

1. States set their own rules, creating big gaps in education quality.

2. Poorer schools lose federal funding for things like special education.

3. Rich areas thrive while poor ones fall behind without federal help.

4. No national standards mean no one checks if schools are doing their job.

5. Civil rights protections, like Title IX, could weaken or vanish.

6. Programs for research and education tech disappear.

7. Federal student loans collapse, leaving borrowers stuck with private lenders.

8. U.S. education loses its edge globally without consistent standards.

These programs could all be in trouble at the local level.

Special Education (IDEA).

Low-Income Student Support (Title I).

Free and Reduced Lunch Programs.

STEM Education Initiatives.

Teacher Training and Recruitment.

English as a Second Language (ESL).

Technology and Internet Access.

School Safety Initiatives.

Arts and Music Programs.

Career and Technical Education (CTE).

Rural School Support.

Early Childhood Education (Head Start).

Civil Rights Enforcement.



Best case

1. States get full control, tailoring education to local needs.

2. Less federal bureaucracy means faster decision-making and innovation.

3. Schools focus on teaching, not meeting federal mandates.

4. Communities invest directly in education, fostering local accountability.

5. Taxpayer money stays within states instead of going to federal programs.

6. More room for school choice and alternative education models.

7. Local solutions to education problems replace one-size-fits-all policies.

8. Education evolves faster to meet modern challenges without federal red tape.

Even in the best case scenario who would be there to protect marginalized student communities?
 

HabitualChiller

Enjoying a Long Night of Solace✌
Supporter
Joined
Oct 27, 2016
Messages
16,677
Reputation
3,825
Daps
51,813
Reppin
Somewhere on an Xbox
He literally said he doesn’t want education to be funded by the federal government and instead education should be funded by the individual states.
That's cool and all, but where are the poorer states going to get said funding? What programs will they make cuts to in order to acquire those funds?
 
Top