Maybe you aren't mad but you're looking the other way at some things.
If someone has 150 posts shytting on black women, y'all want to make it about Sasha but it's about Naomi too (and not that she signed with iMPACT) but then all these WWE racist threads pop up whether it's creative, Vince himself, etc.. and then Naomi comes out and says she left because of
comments... right...
And all those same posters are nowhere to be seen.... then yes, they are either shameful cacs playing that part or they are loser ass WWE stans or a combination of the two.
That's simple math bruh..... simple math
And what do I mean about shytting on them.
1. Anyone who says they have a "bad atttitude" and take the company line on that is automatically a cac to me. I don't care. Black women don't need to be talked down to at the work place, we all know what that's about.
2. Anyone who says Naomi "followed Sasha" is a dumbass and probably a cac. She laid out the reasons she left, had nothing to do with being a follower. They make Naomi out to be a child. She's a grown woman. Very suspect comments.
3. Anyone who said they will come crawling back and "won't make it on their own" sounded like cacs and corporate shills and in Sasha's case she proved that she didn't need the shyt to do what she wants.