They should’ve never gave y’all nikkas science. Cacs have created an inverted mirror cell that could bypass our immune defense system.

Ozymandeas

Veteran
Joined
Jan 28, 2013
Messages
15,246
Reputation
2,336
Daps
72,259
Reppin
NULL
What’s the psychological scientific reason for this playa :dahell:


Creating "mirror life" could be one of science's greatest breakthroughs, but some researchers who began the effort are now calling for it to stop.

No mirror-life microorganisms exist. But 38 scientists warned in a paper published in the journal Science on December 12 that if someone created one and it escaped the lab, it could cause a catastrophic multispecies pandemic.

"We're basically giving instructions of how to make a perfect bioweapon," Kate Adamala, a coauthor of the paper and a chemist who leads a synthetic biology lab at the University of Minnesota, told Business Insider.

As the risks became clear, Adamala ended her lab's efforts to build a mirror cell. Her multiyear grant for that research expired and she decided not to apply for renewal, she said.


Now she and the 37 other researchers are urging other scientists to do the same.


"Although we were initially skeptical that mirror bacteria could pose major risks, we have become deeply concerned," they wrote in the paper.

What is mirror life?​

Mirror biology takes a fundamental rule of life on Earth, called chirality, and flips it.

Chirality is the simple fact that molecules — like sugars and amino acids — point in one of two directions. They are either right-handed or left-handed.

For some reason, though, life uses only one chiral form of each molecule. DNA, for example, uses only right-handed sugars for its backbone. That's why it twists to the right.

In mirror biology, scientists aim to create living cells where all the chirality is flipped. Where natural life uses a right-handed peptide to build proteins, mirror life would use the same peptide in its left-handed form.

Adamala's research focused on making mirror peptides, which can help create longer-lasting pharmaceuticals.


The long-term goal of that research was a full mirror cell. Mirror cells could help prevent contamination in bioreactors that use bacteria for green chemical manufacturing because, in theory, they wouldn't interact with natural microorganisms.

"You could have this perfect bioreactor that can just sit there and you can stick your finger into it and you're not going to contaminate it," Adamala said. "That's also precisely the problem."

A mirror bacteria could bypass the natural checks and balances of life, like competing with other bacteria or battling our immune systems.

Immune systems would ignore mirror cells​

Adamala said "the death sentence" for her mirror-cell research came when she spoke to immunologists. They explained that for humans, other animals, and plants, immune-system activation depends on chirality.

Immune cells recognize pathogens' proteins, but they wouldn't detect the inverse versions of those proteins that mirror cells would use.

A mirror pathogen "doesn't interact with the host," Adamala said. "It just uses it as a warm incubator with a lot of nutrients."


If a mirror bacteria escaped the lab, it could cause slow, persistent infections that couldn't be treated with antibiotics (because those, too, rely on chirality).

Because they wouldn't face immune resistance, mirror bacteria wouldn't need to specialize in infecting corn, or goats, or birds.

"It would be a disease of anything that lives that can be infected," Adamala said.

In the worst-case scenario, a mirror bacteria would multiply endlessly, unfettered. It would take over its hosts and eventually kill them. It would destroy crops. It would have no predators. It would overwhelm entire ecosystems, swapping out portions of our natural world for a new mirror world.

A long way away​

Ting Zhu, one of the leading researchers working in mirror-image biology systems, told BI in an email that he supported being cautious but didn't think that "a complete mirror-image bacterium can be synthesized in the foreseeable future."

Zhu leads a mirror-image biology lab at Westlake University in China. He was not involved in the Science paper.

Adamala estimates that the world's first mirror bacteria is still about a decade away. She argues that's exactly why the research should stop now, before it builds all the tools that someone could use to make that final leap.

"No one can do it on their own right now," Adamala said. "The technology is not mature enough, which means we're pretty well safeguarded against someone crazy enough to say, 'I'll just go do it.'"

In the meantime, Adamala and the other paper authors invited more research on and scrutiny of the risks they identified.

"If someone does prove us wrong, that would make me really happy," she said.
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
57,947
Reputation
8,572
Daps
161,542


‘Unprecedented risk’ to life on Earth: Scientists call for halt on ‘mirror life’ microbe research​


Experts warn that mirror bacteria, constructed from mirror images of molecules found in nature, could put humans, animals and plants at risk of lethal infections

Ian Sample Science editor

Thu 12 Dec 2024 14.00 EST

8000.jpg


The DNA of all living organisms is made from ‘right-handed’ nucleotides, while proteins, the building blocks of cells, are made from ‘left-handed’ amino acids. Photograph: Leigh Prather/Alamy

World-leading scientists have called for a halt on research to create “mirror life” microbes amid concerns that the synthetic organisms would present an “unprecedented risk” to life on Earth.

The international group of Nobel laureates and other experts warn that mirror bacteria, constructed from mirror images of molecules found in nature, could become established in the environment and slip past the immune defences of natural organisms, putting humans, animals and plants at risk of lethal infections.

Although a viable mirror microbe would probably take at least a decade to build, a new risk assessment raised such serious concerns about the organisms that the 38-strong group urged scientists to stop work towards the goal and asked funders to make clear they will no longer support the research.

“The threat we’re talking about is unprecedented,” said Prof Vaughn Cooper, an evolutionary biologist at the University of Pittsburgh. “Mirror bacteria would likely evade many human, animal and plant immune system responses and in each case would cause lethal infections that would spread without check.”

The expert group includes Dr Craig Venter, the US scientist who led the private effort to sequence the human genome in the 1990s, and the Nobel laureates Prof Greg Winter at the University of Cambridge and Prof Jack Szostak at the University of Chicago.

Many molecules for life can exist in two distinct forms, each the mirror image of the other. The DNA of all living organisms is made from “right-handed” nucleotides, while proteins, the building blocks of cells, are made from “left-handed” amino acids. Why nature works this way is unclear: life could have chosen left-handed DNA and right-handed proteins instead.

Scientists have already manufactured large, functional mirror molecules to study them more closely. Some have even taken baby steps towards building mirror microbes, though constructing a whole organism from mirror molecules is beyond today’s know-how.

The work is driven by fascination and potential applications. Mirror molecules could be turned into therapies for chronic and hard-to-treat diseases, while mirror microbes could make bioproduction facilities, which use bugs to churn out chemicals, more resistant to contamination.

The fresh concerns over the technology are revealed in a 299-page report and a commentary in the journal Science. While enthusiastic about research on mirror molecules, the report sees substantial risks in mirror microbes and calls for a global debate on the work.

Beyond causing lethal infections, the researchers doubt the microbes could be safely contained or kept in check by natural competitors and predators. Existing antibiotics are unlikely to be effective, either.

“Unless compelling evidence emerges that mirror life would not pose extraordinary dangers, we believe that mirror bacteria and other mirror organisms, even those with engineered biocontainment measures, should not be created,” the authors write in Science.

“We therefore recommend that research with the goal of creating mirror bacteria not be permitted, and that funders make clear that they will not support such work.”

Dr Kate Adamala, a synthetic biologist at the University of Minnesota and co-author on the report, was working towards a mirror cell but changed tack last year after studying the risks in detail.

“We should not be making mirror life,” she said. “We have time for the conversation. And that’s what we were trying to do with this paper, to start a global conversation.”

Prof Paul Freemont at Imperial College London, who was not involved in the report, called it an “excellent example of responsible research and innovation”.

“Whilst the authors clearly point out the need for an open and transparent debate on the development of mirrored living organisms, there is also a need to identify the promise and positive uses of mirror chemistry in biological systems, albeit in a limited and perhaps future regulated manner,” he said.
 

Ozymandeas

Veteran
Joined
Jan 28, 2013
Messages
15,246
Reputation
2,336
Daps
72,259
Reppin
NULL
I'm not reading all that :unimpressed:

For my TL/DR crew, your body is made up of cells. Cells are assigned a direction. Either they point left or they point right. This never changes. This is their direction. These scientists have created inverted mirror cells that point the other direction of where it would naturally be. This can be used to create a biological weapon because your immune system doesn’t know to look for the left version of a cell that should’ve been pointed right or the right version of a cell that should’ve been pointed left.
 
Top