Nero Christ
Sniper out now on all digital platforms brev
this scene is almost 50 years old & the effects still hold up & that's because it's practical & yes I do prefer practical over cgi when it can be used but cgi is here & I'm not someone who doesn't recognize it's usefulness either whether it's for cost or reshooting scenes.
However I just find the aesthetic of cgi blood is off at least to me most times...it comes out too red & looks like cartoon blood for instance
that looks like someone shot 2 red paintballs at a wall compared to GF1 you see the mist behind Sollozzo head...I mean it looks realistic
and this shyt is the worst when comparing old horror movies to new ones but I don't have as much a problem here unless the cgi is real bad or the film is going for a realistic approach.
What's your thoughts brehs...you agree or am I old man yelling at the sky
However I just find the aesthetic of cgi blood is off at least to me most times...it comes out too red & looks like cartoon blood for instance
that looks like someone shot 2 red paintballs at a wall compared to GF1 you see the mist behind Sollozzo head...I mean it looks realistic
and this shyt is the worst when comparing old horror movies to new ones but I don't have as much a problem here unless the cgi is real bad or the film is going for a realistic approach.
What's your thoughts brehs...you agree or am I old man yelling at the sky