I can't take that name seriously, "The People's Party", who are the people? Just say something like "Liberal Socialist Party" or something that just states your affiliation.
When does corporations cease to become a collection of people?Not only does that sound like some academic bullshyt that won’t appeal to normal working people but it also falsely defines the party as one more focused on ideology than policy.
MLK led the poor people’s campaign, this like the resurgence of that movement with an actual political party formed around it. The name coveys exactly the message it needs to, a people’s party in lieu of a corporate one.
Never, it's just a group of people who don't need to be in or influencing politics.When does corporations cease to become a collection of people?
I agree but splitting the left wing vote ensures corporations run rampant without government oversightNever, it's just a group of people who don't need to be in or influencing politics.
Not that simple. One corporation can physically exist in many places across different time zones. A person can not.When does corporations cease to become a collection of people?
What a weird take. Normies can’t stand any change.Won't these third party people just stop for awhile? That Green Party fiasco was so embarrassing.