after this paul scholes debacle, only pundits that have actually won something should be allow to critique. Its getting embarrassing for guys like neville, scholes, henry, shearer and even souness ( all great players ) but all rubbish as managers.they should only critique other players but not the managers or their tactics. managing is another ball game. whats more outrageous is guys like sherwood, and big sam talking shyt like they can do the same.
Thats why coaches like Zidane, guardiola, heynches, ancelloti and simoeone are so
its not easy to do it at all.
At cherry picking individual years, I'm talking about levels of consistency, a body of work for a decade (Finishes, Trophies, Europe Comp). How the phuck is that hard to understand?
