Okay, Valencia, Athletic Club never made any impression on European competition so they are a false dawn.
Sevilla and Atletico are a False dawn? Dumbest shyt I've ever heard.
Atletico 2 CL Finals in 3 years. Atletico actually managed to win La Liga as well.
Sevilla 3x Europa league winners in a row.
fukk off. That's a dumb argument easily dismantled with actual facts.
They've made an impression on European football though:
Valencia '99-'05: 2 Champions League final appearances in 3 years, 2 La Liga titles in 3 years, 1 UEFA Cup
Athletic Club: UEFA Cup runners up '77 & '12
Interesting that you vault of "facts" didn't stretch that far back...
The players leave because Real and Barca don't need them and money.
Even if we were to go by this hilariously ignorant notion, the big 2 teams in a league having a stranglehold on the transfer market is not a good thing.
No one want's to leave Fiesta's, Good food, Beautiful Weather and Hot Spanish women to move to England, stop kidding yourself. It's money.
What are you getting at? It's pretty obvious that players leave clubs for more money.
Neymar, for example, would never of left Brazil if Santos could offer him the same financial package as the big European clubs. Same for Ronaldo, Ronaldinho, Rivaldo etc.
Please name one good English coach, there is a reason the BPL is run by foreigners.
I agree theres a dearth of English coaches and managers, and thats unfortunate.
Chelsea is not finishing higher than 4th sorry, too technically deficient.
City can fight for 3rd they have the technical quality.
Don't kid yourself, Chelsea would
easily compete for the La Liga title, season in season out. As with City.
So we can't use results from European Club football's most elite competition to compare Europe's most elite football clubs? Asinine.
We have to use it because its the only actual barometer that has the teams playing against one another. Using anything else is disingenuous and pure speculation. At least this way it's speculation backed by facts.
You're only saying this because it looks bad for the BPL.
No, I'm saying it because cup competitions cannot be used to determine how good one team is over another.
Only the league can do that.
Torres- Hometown club resigned him, they didn't need him. It was nostalgia.
Alex Song- Outlier.
Vermaelen- Transfer ban, they had no choice.
But you said
every player signed by La Liga teams (read: Real/Barca) from Premier League are of the highest quality? Which is it?
None them were the absolute best in La Liga, my point still stands. Sanchez, Ozil and Fabregas were deemed surplus. And surprise, surprise become the best players in their respective BPL teams.
Torres and Mata at the time were the hottest thing in Spanish football when they signed for Liverpool and Chelsea respectively.
Costa tore up La Liga the season Chelsea signed him
Also, why did Fabregas leave Barcelona and go to Arsenal? Surely fiestas, sangrias on the beach and hot Spainsh birds should have been enough to keep him at the Nou Camp, no?
If you come up in La Liga youth system your technique will be better than 100% of the englishmen who came up in the BPL youth system.
I'm surprised you don't have any "facts" to back this statement up.
It's funny how everyone arguing for La Liga/Bundesliga has numbers, data, sources, player quotes and facts that back their argument.
While the BPL circlejerkers don't even have anecdotal evidence.
Because football, unlike other sports, isn't played on a spreadsheet.