[...]
It's not even like I know a lot about soccer (even though I do know a fair bit about soccer, I've decided I'll cut myself before I ever posit a legitimate opinion on anything pertaining to soccer. Mainly because I'm not a fukking pundit, also, on the internet you're either sounding like a budget Michael Cox or you're not saying anything new or novel. I'd rather just try joke after joke to see if anything sticks at all than try to talk about whether or not Arsene should buy a striker, whether Moyes was the right choice, who gives a fukk. It's all the same posters, we all have our roles, fukk giving actual opinions.)
Generally, when one is talking about a matter he's no expert in, chances are he says shyt he read elsewhere. The bright way of doing this is just to take it and make your own opinion off it through your own observations. There is no shame doing that.
Lately I found myself watching football only to understand tactics. Don't really care about the game but the shapes, the movement, the player's positions and interactions. And well, it's incredibly interesting. Real-life chess honestly. Saw a bit of Barça / Getafe and was irked that Barça was kinda sloppy and couldn't force Getafe's lock (they are really less impressive at that since the Pep days by the way). Then, out of nowhere you have that fake by Messi opening up the right side of Getafe by provoking a 2 vs 1, for Tello to assist him brilliantly. Was

by that movement and really enjoyed that. Above all because I was getting bored
Thing is I've only come to this way of watching football only after reading heavily some tactics blogs because they provide good insight on how things works on the pitch and that's refreshing. Found out about "Zone 14" and "Half-spaces" a month ago and now when I find the time to play me some FIFA I always try to hit them. Will try to implement that in my team soon. I have a new found appreciation for coaching
That's why the coli is so terrible. From trolling one of the playoffs thread I've learned that (1) people really don't know all that much about sports (2) on the coli people come to find legitimate sports dialogue when in reality they're only finding other inept mugs to talk about the same non-talking points as them. There isn't a poster worth their salt outside of this thread. I mean that.

Isn't it like how online debates are mostly ? Not many people enter a debate on the innanetz letting the door open to be convinced. The Coli is no exception. I'm on the internet since like 1999 and been on message boards for a little less than that and it's always been this way. From video game message boards, to polics one, to music one, passing by news websites.
But I don't debate on The Coli mostly because it's often American matters and because (I don't if it's the American way but) most problems are somehow linked to "races". And I hate that point of view. I'm really boggled by how things appears to be (I don't know for sure, maybe the Coli deforms reality) black and white in your country. Kind of scary honestly.
I've perused the threads, it eerily mirrors real life. I have never meet people in real life who are breaking down NFL games into defensive schemes, strategies, it's always the most obvious things anyone can muster. And you listen to the commentary for any given game (I've actually watched my fair bit of playoff football this year) and it's so basic and full of fukkwittery that it's no coincidence.
Yeah I'm often troubled by basic commentary and I (figuratively) pray for non-commented games. I swear I'd pay to watch games only with the sound of the crowd and the players. But commentary is basic because networks aim at the largest audience possible maybe. I don't know how it is in the US but mostly, when watching sport on TV in France, most announcers team are composed by "an expert" and "an enthusiastic announcer" (which know little to none about the sports he's commenting). The former is here to give some tactical key points, the latter is here to rejoice at every type of shyt

.
But yeah, they don't really go in depth but it's also because it's the role of debriefing shows with analysis, stats and charts.
I wonder, can @
Grams become the first announcer mixing spot-on analysis and great commenting at the SAME DAMN TIME ?!
