Essential The Official Football (Soccer) Thread - The Scriptures Prophesied the Messiah Plays 3-4-3

[Mickey Kane]

Yeah, they rather shoot themselves in the foot that have City run the league.

PSR was a sham, penalized clubs in the bottom half of the table(most of whom were conned by the American owners to vote for it). So now they propose a salary cap based on the TV revenue of the last placed team.

What attracts players to the shyt weather and shyt food of England? Money and the lure of playing in the most televised league in the world. Mid table clubs like Chelsea and United can buy questionable youth prospects like Amad Diallo and Madueke, with these new rules these clubs have a much smaller margin for error when making transfers. Same goes for the man dem that thought they could find a world class talent in Zinchenko and Gabriel Jesus.

The margins of error being smaller is better in the long-term if it means clubs are more selective with how they spend money and you know, clubs are responsible for actually coaching players and not just splashing cash.

Also have to account for the insane money spent on agent fees.

You are a Manchester City fan though so, there's that, lol.

 

[wire28]

You mean the league wants to stop City and clubs like them continuing to operate with impunity.

It's not sustainable for English football from the PL all the way down to the pyramid for a select few to be ran the way it has.

As long as the execution is right, the PL should absolutely look at better ways to regulate how spending occurs in the best interests of the Game and not 3-4 teams.

Let’s keep it a buck nobody cares about west ham hoisting the trophy. They only care about 3-4 teams, city being one of them.

 

[Legal]

I'm not too familiar with how Premiere League rights fees are distributed. Could this change also be about making sure everyone's equally invested in getting favorable TV terms, similar to the NFL?

 

[null]

So now they propose a salary cap based on the TV revenue of the last placed team.

a salary cap is about league stability and increasing competition.

like in american leagues.

MU voted against it but i wouldn't have a problem with it.



if they want to increase the cap they need to share the TV income more evenly.

 

[THEREALBRAND]

Top of the table through four games

 

[Black Magisterialness]

Let’s keep it a buck nobody cares about west ham hoisting the trophy. They only care about 3-4 teams, city being one of them.

the WOULD care if they knew west ham had a chance. There's a reason why Leicester winning was so insane and memorable.

 

[jj23]

the WOULD care if they knew west ham had a chance. There's a reason why Leicester winning was so insane and memorable.

That was a great season of football though. If the top six clubs can't thrive despite their clear financial advantages they shouldn't be there.

 

[Roberto Firmino]

 

[Ukbrotha]

My GOAT Super eagle in the 90s. I hope he does well.

 

[THEREALBRAND]

Gabi is getting a two year ban for “allegedly” trying to fraud a doping test. I think I’m taking a break from football for a while.

Gabi has been cleared to play by CAS.

 

[Nero Christ]

Again,nikkas have selective memories that title was decided in February wayyyy before they called off or empty stadium nonsense..

He staying saying something slick about us...just a coping mechanism for coming up short again

 

[Yayo Toure]

You mean the league wants to stop City and clubs like them continuing to operate with impunity.

It's not sustainable for English football from the PL all the way down to the pyramid for a select few to be ran the way it has.

As long as the execution is right, the PL should absolutely look at better ways to regulate how spending occurs in the best interests of the Game and not 3-4 teams.

Not sustainable? Funny nobody complained when United won every year, used the season to scout players and pillage the league every summer.

Now we have a premier league that is #1 in TV revenue and besides the very top tier of superstar (outside of Haaland) attracts the world's best. They should do all they can to preserve that but instead want to shoot themselves in the foot.

Oh yeah, when the verdict on them 115 charges comes up I'll be right here to see you lot waffling about technicalities. Mans dem think the worlds most reowned accounting firms letting City submit fraudulent financial reports? Lol I'll be here.

 

[Yayo Toure]

Damn thread title accurate

 

[Mickey Kane]

This is dope.

 

[Mickey Kane]

Not sustainable? Funny nobody complained when United won every year, used the season to scout players and pillage the league every summer.

Now we have a premier league that is #1 in TV revenue and besides the very top tier of superstar (outside of Haaland) attracts the world's best. They should do all they can to preserve that but instead want to shoot themselves in the foot.

Oh yeah, when the verdict on them 115 charges comes up I'll be right here to see you lot waffling about technicalities. Mans dem think the worlds most reowned accounting firms letting City submit fraudulent financial reports? Lol I'll be here.

No-one used to complain?

My boy, how old are you? I have to question your background with a statement like that.

People complained, the difference is, your club is ALLEGEDLY financially doping. At no point did Manchester United have the kind of trail YOU are leaving behind. They also complained when Chelsea got taken over in 2003-2004 and as you can see, people had resentment for that club with the way Roman left.

You keep talking about the PL being the #1 product, etc. A real fan of the GAME, not a commercial product doesn't prioritise 'TV revenue' above what's right for the sport because it has consequences beyond the Premier League.

We'll see what happens with the ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTEEEN CHARGES coming your way. No need to speak on something neither of us have enough detail on but if you genuinely think your club is innocent, then cook my boy