Of course Garnacho isn't being charged over the ape emojis. I'm sure you guys are really upset about this.
Jesus Christ breh, where is the story? I for one didn't see it. So can you link it and stop being passive aggressive?Of course Garnacho isn't being charged over the ape emojis. I'm sure you guys are really upset about this.


Not true. Seen issues in the NFL, NBA the Rugby World Cup etc
The problem is every official/referee/umpire etc.. all interpret the rules and laws differently and this is why we get the inconsistency from them and the review system.
![]()
Man Utd: Andre Onana defends Alejandro Garnacho's use of gorilla emojis on social media
Manchester United goalkeeper Andre Onana says no action should be taken against Alejandro Garnacho for using gorilla emojis in a social media post.www.bbc.co.uk
Ok. Big fukking double standard. @Yayo Toure
Big double standard.
![]()
Man Utd: Andre Onana defends Alejandro Garnacho's use of gorilla emojis on social media
Manchester United goalkeeper Andre Onana says no action should be taken against Alejandro Garnacho for using gorilla emojis in a social media post.www.bbc.co.uk
Ok. Big fukking double standard. @Yayo Toure
Big double standard.

I have no articles on the other issue but based on the bbc article they both seem like the punishment should be the sameMaybe because a "gorilla emoji" (or two) cannot be said 100% to refer to someone's race/ethnicity.
Unlike "negrito" for example.
Garnacho's deed is one step further removed than the others![]()
Probably what saved him was that his was referencing Maguire as well.![]()
Man Utd: Andre Onana defends Alejandro Garnacho's use of gorilla emojis on social media
Manchester United goalkeeper Andre Onana says no action should be taken against Alejandro Garnacho for using gorilla emojis in a social media post.www.bbc.co.uk
Ok. Big fukking double standard. @Yayo Toure
Big double standard.

I have no articles on the other issue but based on the bbc article they both seem like the punishment should be the same

