Facts. They can keep crying till the cows come home for all I care. The outrage is so ridiculous as well.The way we were cheated out of that Carabao Cup wow that was an all timer. They're crying about Darren England now but he's the same guy who reviewed this and said no action was required:
fukk Liverpool, PGMOL and everybody that loves them.
A high foot taekwondo stamp on the nut with studs showing is subjective,howThese are all subjective calls. The Diaz offside goal cannot be argued; it's a fact that Diaz scored a validé goal.
Studs to the groin being a subjective call would be hilarious if it wasn't so disingenuous.
I'm assuming you mean the VAR officials and not the ref.I just got to watch Liverpool/Tottenham.
That fukking ref should be fired and burned at the stake. fukking bullshyt.
To clarify I don’t wish death on anybody, it’s just hyperbole.
But that ref needs to be banned.
Not a red in any worldThe way we were cheated out of that Carabao Cup wow that was an all timer. They're crying about Darren England now but he's the same guy who reviewed this and said no action was required:
fukk Liverpool, PGMOL and everybody that loves them.
High boot with studs showing challenge is not subjective according to the rule book , actually. It's deemed a reckless and dangerous play warranting a straight redIt is subjective. Unless it's DOGSO, all foul calls are subjective. They're all up to the ref's discretion. Obviously, some like Keita's kick to the groin should be punished more harshly than others but it's still subjective.