But they were not cooking the books and committing fraud during that era which is Null's argument
In the real life when it's not involving a football team, it would be a criminal offence where the ceo/chairman could be facing a prison sentence for what they have done
Maybe that is why Chelsea get some respect unlike City, yeah they got brought out by oil money, but they did it all correct and by the books.
Same as Newcastle
If city were taken over in that "era" ie Fergy in the 90's/early 2000's, im pretty sure city wouldnt even need to have done the alleged cooking the books - spending a shytload of money back then was fair game. Rules began to change not long after Chelsea started winning with oil money.