Didn't Chelsea do the same exact thing before?
Which one?Had completely forgot about Fofana going to Chelsea
Which one?
The one who only played 7 league games last season, signed for 75 million. And has been injured for all of this season
Weghorst and Sabitzer is a pretty good window given the whole, not having a pot to piss in situation.
Eriksen getting injured takes a bit of impact away from the Sabitzer one because it means we are where we were in terms of depth.(same with Weghorst/Ronaldo tbf but fukk that rapist)
But he was a highly rated/wanted player pre-Bayern and apparently he hasn't been bad there or anything.
70m is the sweet spot. Anything over that there a high chance the player will never justify the fee.
70m is the sweet spot. Anything over that there a high chance the player will never justify the fee.
Our hands are tied financially because of the club being for sale(even then we need to sell to buy for FFP reasons.)Bro your always overreacting. This is a 4/10 transfer window for us at best.
Listen to Mark's episode from last night.
City is well run and the only time they splurged was on Grealish, which has been a mistake. They pretty much have a set number of around 70m on transfer which has allowed them not to overspend on most of their roster. However, that doesn't tell the whole story because City offers the highest wages, so they do spend a lot on these players transfers, but their transfer policy for the most part is well run
That UTD transfers!!
Here I thought City was crazy with it
Forest really signed Navas? Has Deano been bad or something?