null
...
MU ahead of schedule as usual 

I bet Denver got cut when they put Atlanta in the central.
Wait, was Nashville central or east? Either way, they probably should have been picked.
15/16 I got right. One I missed was Boston and honestly Boston is a sports down, but that stadium is not near DT Boston. Boston hasn't done much to warrant being a host. Should have gone with Nashville as it's more central and all of it's party night life would have been a huge draw for the tournament.
Breh, I saw this on Reddit soccer. The comments are from some brain dead fools. I mean anyone who’s watches Mane knows he’s a humble, pious Muslim and ain’t with all the extra stuff (thus far haven’t heard him in any scandals).I wonder how many broads Mane has pissed off with this quote![]()
I wonder how many broads Mane has pissed off with this quote
Can you care to explain why KC and Seattle got picked over say DC/DMV or Chicago?
Boston I kinda get. On the East coast and is an iconic American city. You want people in cities that leave them with a lasting impression or in a city that has the infrastructure to hold such an event.
I think I get Seattle. I think the Sounders have the best football culture in the US so for the WC they’d have events for the fans. Cool.
But KC?!?!
Breh, I saw this on Reddit soccer. The comments are from some brain dead fools. I mean anyone who’s watches Mane knows he’s a humble, pious Muslim and ain’t with all the extra stuff (thus far haven’t heard him in any scandals).
He just doesn’t want an iG thot as a wife.
Redditors out there on some “ohh hes such a bigot etc”
Chelsea have done fukk all
Can you care to explain why KC and Seattle got picked over say DC/DMV or Chicago?
Boston I kinda get. On the East coast and is an iconic American city. You want people in cities that leave them with a lasting impression or in a city that has the infrastructure to hold such an event.
I think I get Seattle. I think the Sounders have the best football culture in the US so for the WC they’d have events for the fans. Cool.
uhhh ... Kansas City is probably the biggest consistent soccer city in the midwestern USA that supports soccer, bro. SKC has been one of the best supported teams for so long and they get games there damn near every Gold Cup. The team doesn't win as much as they used to but the support is still there.
As for DC, they got negative feedback when they toured FedEX. Stadium needed too much work and I just think the DC/Baltimore bid didn't wow people. It's weird to not be in the nations capital and DC has hosted massive games in the past, but Philly and their newer stadium seemed to wow FIFA. Personally feel like Boston is the city that shouldn't be hosting games.
Serious question: who is available that would make Chelsea appreciably better?