they are being charged over a period that ends in, i think, 2018. so not "onward" but a fixed period that has already ended.
not sure we have spoken about this but legally speaking they are not just guilty of "hiding expenditure".
morally (turpitude) and legally they are guilty of breaking the rules (in all manner of ways)
more than 100 TIMES.
who is to say whether they would have broken the rules back then.
100 plus contraventions shows them doing whatever they needed to do to be top dog.
-
would a man who shoots someone with a gun in 2023 not have taken a life before guns were invented.
a man who shot > 100 people?
sure he couldn't writ-large 'kill with a gun' before guns were invented but his flagrant lack of respect for lives suggests that in the right(wrong) circumstances he would used some other pre-gun type of weapon.
likewise city's lack of respect for the rules suggests that THEY WOULD HAVE ... obeyed all the rules ...?
no.
man united deserve the position they are in due to their flagrant mismanagement.
chelsea have won the most in england since 2004 and are just 1 john terry mis-kick away from being ahead of man united in champions leagues.
city meanwhile are struggling to win their first champions league.
you don't hear people complaining about chelsea winning what they have because chelsea did not break the rules like city did.
it is that simple
we are answering you because you are trying to defend the indefensible.
if you just accepted the truth of their skulduggery the conversation would be long over.
stop trying to rationalise CHEATS.
if clubs can just do what they want then what is the point of rules in football anyway?