The median age of Bill Orielly's viewer :laff:

[Robbie3000]

Here's a startling number. The average age of Bill O'Reilly's audience is 71. You didn't see that wrong -- 71 years old!

If you've been retired for several years, you're still several years younger than the average Bill O'Reilly viewer.

I don't have anything against old people, really old people, but it's hard to say that O'Reilly's audience is the future. Half of them would be lucky to make it past the decade.

So, it turns out this big, bad, powerful O'Reilly is basically doing a show at a senior citizen's center. Are O'Reilly's viewers going to determine where this country is heading? We can't even tell where they're heading because they won't turn off their left blinker.

I think the formative years are between the ages of 14 and 24. That's when people set their worldview and form most of their conceptions. When Bill O'Reilly's audience was going through their formative years, it was 1949 to 1959. I'm not kidding, do the math.

Some could argue that some of the people of that era grew up in a different world than we did. Some in the South and other regions grew up with a certain ideology that might predispose them to listen to what O'Reilly spews today. I'm not saying anything, I'm just saying. You do the math.

My dad is 68, making him younger than the average O'Reilly viewer, but within the ballpark. He is as sharp as anyone I know. He is smart, engaged and an incredibly productive member of society. So, this is not a diss on our older generation. But he grew up in a house that didn't even have electricity (granted it was in southeastern Turkey). If he is several years younger than O'Reilly's average viewer, it's hard to argue that O'Reilly's views are going to shape where this country is going in the future.

Given these facts, it's not hard to see why O'Reilly is losing viewers. They're not dying to watch him, they're dying while watching him. His audience is so old Barbara Bush was jailbait when they were growing up. His audience is so old they remember how hot Betty Rubble was in high school. His audience is so old they don't remember when Iraq was like the Garden of Eden, they remember when Iraq was the Garden of Eden.

Let's get real, O'Reilly's audience has fallen and they can't get up.

71 years old! I had no idea



No wonder his ratings are so high.

It all makes so much sense now. He preaches to senior citizens with nothing better to do than reminisce about their Happy Dayseque 1950s America (which never really existed as they remember).

 

[Dusty Bake Activate]

Lol...not surprising at all.

 

[Domingo Halliburton]

Sean hannity is the better troll

 

[The Real]

No wonder he's screaming all the time. His viewers can't hear him otherwise.

 

[¯\_(ツ)_/¯]

@ this article

 

[Kritic]

liberal networks are doing a lot worse. so even though i don't care about nicca he's doing a lot better than the liberal networks.

 

[¯\_(ツ)_/¯]

liberal networks are doing a lot worse. so even though i don't care about nicca he's doing a lot better than the liberal networks.

liberals usually don't get news from T.V.

According to Alexa Huffingtonpost.com is ranked higher than Fox News.com in terms of Internet user visits.

Infowars.com is ranked way below both of them

 

[Dusty Bake Activate]

liberals usually don't get news from T.V.

According to Alexa Huffingtonpost.com is ranked higher than Fox News.com in terms of Internet user visits.

Infowars.com is ranked way below both of them

Pretty much. I can't remember the last time I watched MSNBC. I get all the news I need from the internet.

 

[Higher Tech]

liberals usually don't get news from T.V.

According to Alexa Huffingtonpost.com is ranked higher than Fox News.com in terms of Internet user visits.

Infowars.com is ranked way below both of them

Thank God.

 

[Kritic]

liberals usually don't get news from T.V.

According to Alexa Huffingtonpost.com is ranked higher than Fox News.com in terms of Internet user visits.

Infowars.com is ranked way below both of them

you're trying to change the subject. we're talking tv. why doesnt cnn tv close up shop.
huffingtonpost is an aol site and eating off aol's base which has been an internet site.


infowars and the blaze is on the come up. we own our own sh1t. we aint part of a plantation like you niccas over there.

 

[Kritic]

On the Thursday, May 9 edition of the Alex Jones Show, 3D printing guru Cody Wilson of Defense Distributed announced that the US Office of Defense Trade Controls Compliance, Enforcement Division (DTCC/END) had sent him a letter requesting the group remove all data supposedly in violation of the Arms Export Control Act from public access immediately.

The letter, issued by the US Department of State, says:


“DTCC/END is conducting a review of technical data made publicly available by Defense Distributed through its 3D printing website, DEFCAD.org, the majority of which appear to be related to items in Category I of the USML. Defense Distributed may have released ITAR-controlled technical data without required prior authorization from the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC), a violation of the ITAR.”


USML stands for United States Munitions List, and ITAR stands for the International Traffic in Arms Regulations.


According to the letter, “Pursuant to § 127.1 of the ITAR it is unlawful to export any defense article or technical data for which a license or written approval is required without first obtaining the required authorization from the DTCC. Please note that disclosing (including oral or visual disclosure) or transferring technical data to a foreign person, whether in the United States or abroad, is considered an export under § 120.17 of the ITAR.”


Further in the letter, it lists the 3D printable gun files available through DEFCAD.org that the DTCC says violate the ITAR.


“The Department believes Defense Distributed may not have established the proper jurisdiction of the subject technical data. To resolve this matter officially, we request that Defense Distributed submit Commodity Jurisdiction (CJ) determination requests for the following selection of data files available on DEFCAD.org, and any other technical data for which Defense Distributed is unable to determine proper jurisdiction:

1. Defense Distributed Liberator pistol
2. .22 el3ectric
3. 125mm BK-14M high-explosive anti-tank warhead
4. 5.56/.223 muzzle brake
5. Springfield XD-40 tactical slide assembly
6. Sound Moderator – slip on
7. “The Dirty Diane” ½-28 to 3/4-16 STP S3600 oil filter silencer adapter
8. 12 gauge .22 CB sub-caliber insert
9. Voltlock electronic black powder system
10. VZ-58 front sight”

The letter goes on, “Until the Department provides Defense Distributed with final CJ determinations, Defense Distributed should treat the above technical data as ITAR-controlled. This means that all such data should be removed from public access immediately. Defense Distributed should also review the remainder of the data made public on its website to determine whether any additional data may be similarly controlled and proceed according to ITAR requirements.”

Defense Distributed recently garnered major attention after they were able to produce a complete firearm, titled the Liberator, solely using 3D printed parts. Data for the Liberator files have reportedly already been downloaded over 100,000 times.

It’s clear that it was this milestone that inspired the Department of State to pursue compliance orders.

The mandate is in line with the United Nations International Arms Control Treaty which has attempted to regulate firearms by exploiting import-export laws. According to Kentucky Senator Rand Paul, the UN’s Small Arms Treaty “is in fact a massive, GLOBAL gun control scheme.”

The following now appears at the top of defcad.org:

View the take-down notice sent to Defense Distributed: Page 1 Page 2 Page 3

More on this story as it develops…​

@JUSE_HEDD