I watched it entirely except for 10 min in the middle.
Imo she got smoked on basically all topics. She did slightly better than last time but he's just more talented, technical and faster than her.
I think it's also due to the fact that her ideological position is inherently inferior in terms of logic than his, so she couldn't press him even on topics where he was more shaky.
For example, when it comes to ecology, there was a whole avenue of attacks she could have leveraged on his track record and present position but she somehow managed to be even worse, because she doesn't stand on shyt in that regard neither.
Besides the exercise of the debate, there were also other stakes they both had to consider, notably for her: getting the far-left electorate that hates Macron to vote for her or at least not vote at all.
She might have even failed in that regard since she emphasized some of the most extreme parts of her rhetoric (banning the veil, supressing jus soli citizenship, the "ensavaging" of France). Some say it's because since the Overton window moved to the right of her, she has to keep on consolidating her base, but does she gain more than she loses from doing that?
Macron also had to gather votes from his left side and I can't say if he did well in that aspect, even if hekinda tried. Folks see him as arrogant and condescending and I wouldn't be surprised if they felt like he was all that tonight. But again, hard to say if there is anything he could have done in 2 hours and a half to change a reputation built over years.
That's just my assessment