The Jewnited States
Superstar
would be something like this
this was mostly for the people who say there's no difference over 24 fps for the human eye
Hollywood originally chose 24 due to price of film and editing technology limitations of the time. You saved film because it was only 24fps. It was divisible by 12 which made cutting easier. 24fps was barely passable for smooth motion. So they went with it.
Fast forward many years later and people have come to associate 24fps with the cinematic look. It's dreamy.it doesnt look like youre in the room. The motion is a little blurred. It feels like you're watching something. You get lost in it. Things don't pop out to take you out of it. Things don't look real.
The uproar over 48fps is that it was a little too real. Too close to the human frame rate. Things looked to real.
So what's my rant about?
Low frames per second = good for movies
High frames = good for video games
im talking about video games bruh. some ppl are out here saying you only need 24 fps for motion so anything above that is unnecessary
Hollywood originally chose 24 due to price of film and editing technology limitations of the time. You saved film because it was only 24fps. It was divisible by 12 which made cutting easier. 24fps was barely passable for smooth motion. So they went with it.
Fast forward many years later and people have come to associate 24fps with the cinematic look. It's dreamy.it doesnt look like youre in the room. The motion is a little blurred. It feels like you're watching something. You get lost in it. Things don't pop out to take you out of it. Things don't look real.
The uproar over 48fps is that it was a little too real. Too close to the human frame rate. The soap opera effect. What your TV does to movies when Smooth Frames or whatever its called is turned on. Garbage. Hate when people have that "feature" turned on.
And I completely agree. It looks like some Masterpiece Theater type shyt.
So what's my rant about?
Low frames per second = good for movies
High frames = good for video games
im talking about video games bruh. some ppl are out here saying you only need 24 fps for motion so anything above that is unnecessary
People really say that about videogames?
Hollywood originally chose 24 due to price of film and editing technology limitations of the time. You saved film because it was only 24fps. It was divisible by 12 which made cutting easier. 24fps was barely passable for smooth motion. So they went with it.
Fast forward many years later and people have come to associate 24fps with the cinematic look. It's dreamy.it doesnt look like youre in the room. The motion is a little blurred. It feels like you're watching something. You get lost in it. Things don't pop out to take you out of it. Things don't look real.
The uproar over 48fps is that it was a little too real. Too close to the human frame rate. The soap opera effect. What your TV does to movies when Smooth Frames or whatever its called is turned on. Garbage. Hate when people have that "feature" turned on.
And I completely agree. It looks like some Masterpiece Theater type shyt.
So what's my rant about?
Low frames per second = good for movies
High frames = good for video games