The bizarre clause Sean Connery reportedly demanded in his contracts
20th Century Studios
By Sabienna Bowman/Oct. 31, 2020 4:58 pm EDT
The clause Sean Connery reportedly wanted in contracts
The late Sir Sean Connery will no doubt be remembered first and foremost for being the man who originated the role of James Bond on the big screen. But prior to his retirement from acting in 2006, he starred in numerous iconic action films. Aside from the James Bond movies, Connery also appeared in Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade, Highlander, and The Rock — all of which include explosive scenes. That seems totally natural since they're all action movies, but in a 2009 Total Film interview (via GamesRadar+), comic book writer Alan Moore alleged that some of the scenes featuring explosions in Connery projects were actually a result of a bizarre clause in the actor's contract.
In his rant-filled interview, Moore discussed The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen, which was based on his comics of the same name. The movie, directed by Stephen Norrington, was Connery's final live-action project before he retired from acting in 2006, and he went on record saying that the filming process left him disenchanted with modern Hollywood. However, Moore blamed part of the movie's troubles on the alleged demands of its star.
"The film cost £100 million because Sean Connery wanted £17 million of that — and a bigger explosion than the one he'd had in his last film," Moore claimed. "It's in his contract that he has to have a bigger explosion with every film he's in. In The Rock, he'd blown up an island, and he was demanding for our film that he blow up Venice or something like that. It would have been the moon in his next movie."
Did Sean Connery really have an explosions clause in his movie contracts?
20th Century Studios
It should be noted that Moore is famously cantankerous about Hollywood (and the comic book industry), and if Connery was on a quest to have a huge explosion in every single one of his movies, it's never been documented publicly by anyone else. That doesn't mean the clause never existed, but there's a possibility that Moore was being a tad hyperbolic. What is true is that the famed 007 actor and Norrington clashed on the set of The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen.
Back when the movie was still in production in 2002, an article in Entertainment Weekly discussed the tensions on set, which included Connery and Norrington allegedly nearly coming to blows over an elephant gun. "Oh, yes, it's been difficult," Connery said at the time. "Very, very difficult. There's no question about it."
In 2005, Connery opened up a bit more, telling the BBC that his experience on the set of The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen put him off Hollywood for good. "I'm fed up with the idiots ... the ever-widening gap between people who know how to make movies and the people who green-light the movies," he said. "I don't say they're all idiots. I'm just saying there's a lot of them that are very good at it."
While he didn't explicitly call out Norrington in that interview, in 2007, Connery did say that the director "would have been arrested for insanity," according to The Hollywood Reporter. The actor also admitted that he attempted to wrest editorial control away from the young director in hopes of salvaging the movie. Connery's efforts didn't pan out, though, and the movie ended up being a box office flop anyway.
Ultimately, Moore's claim that Connery craved big-budget explosions in his films is just one more strange footnote in the history of a movie with backstage drama so legendary that it truly deserves a film of its own.
Recommended
The real reason Sean Connery stopped playing James Bond
MGM
By AJ Caulfield/Oct. 31, 2020 1:16 pm EST/Updated: Oct. 31, 2020 4:10 pm EST
The first time the world saw a cinematic adaptation of Bond — James Bond — the charismatic Scottish actor Sir Sean Connery was the man in the center of the action. As the titular super-spy, created in 1953 by novelist Ian Fleming, Connery captivated countless movie-goers and raked in millions of dollars at the box office. Following his debut as 007 in 1962's Dr. No, Connery went on to reprise the role in 1963's From Russia with Love, 1964's Goldfinger, 1965's Thunderball, and 1967's You Only Live Twice.
Two years later, the next entry into the James Bond franchise had a new man leading the way: George Lazenby, who brought to life double-0 in 1969's On Her Majesty's Secret Service. But Lazenby's tenure as Bond didn't last long. Connery would return to the role of Bond in 1971's Diamonds Are Forever, and then again over a decade later in 1983's Never Say Never Again — a movie not backed by original production company Eon Productions, and thus considered officially non-canonical.
Tragically, Connery passed away at the age of 90 on October 31, 2020. As the world mourns the loss of the film legend, many are looking back upon his filmography — particularly the time he spent portraying the agent who likes things shaken and not stirred. Why did he pass the proverbial martini glass on to Lazenby, only to return for Diamonds Are Forever, then bid farewell to the core franchise? Here's the real reason why Sean Connery stopped playing James Bond.
Sean Connery grew tired of Bond
MGM
After portraying James Bond for so many years, Connery eventually grew tired of him — for a few reasons.
As detailed by Vanity Fair, in an interview held in 1964 (ahead of the release of Goldfinger), the actor offered up some choice words when describing Bond. "Remove the exotic touches and what have you got?" Connery said. "A dull, prosaic English policeman." It should be noted that Connery could have been purposely downplaying Bond's mystique in an act of humility, but many have taken those remarks as a sign he didn't think very highly of the character — at least at the time. November of that year found Connery singing a different song, telling The New York Times that he'd have an "everlasting" gratitude for James Bond.
However, a gear switched somewhere between then and November 1965, when Connery got even more candid about his feelings towards the character. "Bond's been good to me, so I shouldn't knock him," Connery reportedly told an interviewer before confessing that he was "fed up to here with the whole Bond bit." He even reportedly once said, "I have always hated that damned James Bond. I'd like to kill him" (via The Guardian).
Salary disputes reportedly factored in to Connery's unhappiness as well, as did tense discussions with executives about being properly compensated for his work in the films, according to Connery's comments during a 1971 interview with The Guardian. Adding fuel to the fire was the falling-out Connery had with producers Harry Saltzman and Albert "Cubby" R. Broccoli, again over Connery's salary.
Yet another reason Connery walked away from Bond? He was tired of the franchise not feeling grounded. "One of the reasons I stopped doing it was because I got really fed up with the space stuff and special effects. I just found it getting more and more influential in the movies," he said in 2005 (via The Irish Examiner).
One of Connery's close friends, fellow film icon Michael Caine, shed light on Connery's thoughts about Bond — revealing that the actor found it "upsetting" that so many people knew him as Bond and nothing more.
"If you were his friend in these early days, you didn't raise the subject of Bond. He was, and is, a much better actor than just playing James Bond, but he became synonymous with Bond. He'd be walking down the street and people would say, 'Look, there's James Bond,'" Caine once said (via The Wall Street Journal). "That was particularly upsetting to him."
As film fans know, Connery is indeed much more than James Bond. His diverse filmography spanned decades and featured roles in works like Murder on the Orient Express, The Man Who Would Be King, The Untouchables, Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade, The Hunt for Red October, Highlander, Highlander II: The Quickening, Rising Sun, Dragonheart, The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen, and many more.
He may be gone, but Sir Sean Connery will never be forgotten.
Recommended
20th Century Studios
By Sabienna Bowman/Oct. 31, 2020 4:58 pm EDT
The clause Sean Connery reportedly wanted in contracts
The late Sir Sean Connery will no doubt be remembered first and foremost for being the man who originated the role of James Bond on the big screen. But prior to his retirement from acting in 2006, he starred in numerous iconic action films. Aside from the James Bond movies, Connery also appeared in Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade, Highlander, and The Rock — all of which include explosive scenes. That seems totally natural since they're all action movies, but in a 2009 Total Film interview (via GamesRadar+), comic book writer Alan Moore alleged that some of the scenes featuring explosions in Connery projects were actually a result of a bizarre clause in the actor's contract.
In his rant-filled interview, Moore discussed The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen, which was based on his comics of the same name. The movie, directed by Stephen Norrington, was Connery's final live-action project before he retired from acting in 2006, and he went on record saying that the filming process left him disenchanted with modern Hollywood. However, Moore blamed part of the movie's troubles on the alleged demands of its star.
"The film cost £100 million because Sean Connery wanted £17 million of that — and a bigger explosion than the one he'd had in his last film," Moore claimed. "It's in his contract that he has to have a bigger explosion with every film he's in. In The Rock, he'd blown up an island, and he was demanding for our film that he blow up Venice or something like that. It would have been the moon in his next movie."
Did Sean Connery really have an explosions clause in his movie contracts?
20th Century Studios
It should be noted that Moore is famously cantankerous about Hollywood (and the comic book industry), and if Connery was on a quest to have a huge explosion in every single one of his movies, it's never been documented publicly by anyone else. That doesn't mean the clause never existed, but there's a possibility that Moore was being a tad hyperbolic. What is true is that the famed 007 actor and Norrington clashed on the set of The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen.
Back when the movie was still in production in 2002, an article in Entertainment Weekly discussed the tensions on set, which included Connery and Norrington allegedly nearly coming to blows over an elephant gun. "Oh, yes, it's been difficult," Connery said at the time. "Very, very difficult. There's no question about it."
In 2005, Connery opened up a bit more, telling the BBC that his experience on the set of The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen put him off Hollywood for good. "I'm fed up with the idiots ... the ever-widening gap between people who know how to make movies and the people who green-light the movies," he said. "I don't say they're all idiots. I'm just saying there's a lot of them that are very good at it."
While he didn't explicitly call out Norrington in that interview, in 2007, Connery did say that the director "would have been arrested for insanity," according to The Hollywood Reporter. The actor also admitted that he attempted to wrest editorial control away from the young director in hopes of salvaging the movie. Connery's efforts didn't pan out, though, and the movie ended up being a box office flop anyway.
Ultimately, Moore's claim that Connery craved big-budget explosions in his films is just one more strange footnote in the history of a movie with backstage drama so legendary that it truly deserves a film of its own.
Recommended
The real reason Sean Connery stopped playing James Bond
MGM
By AJ Caulfield/Oct. 31, 2020 1:16 pm EST/Updated: Oct. 31, 2020 4:10 pm EST
The first time the world saw a cinematic adaptation of Bond — James Bond — the charismatic Scottish actor Sir Sean Connery was the man in the center of the action. As the titular super-spy, created in 1953 by novelist Ian Fleming, Connery captivated countless movie-goers and raked in millions of dollars at the box office. Following his debut as 007 in 1962's Dr. No, Connery went on to reprise the role in 1963's From Russia with Love, 1964's Goldfinger, 1965's Thunderball, and 1967's You Only Live Twice.
Two years later, the next entry into the James Bond franchise had a new man leading the way: George Lazenby, who brought to life double-0 in 1969's On Her Majesty's Secret Service. But Lazenby's tenure as Bond didn't last long. Connery would return to the role of Bond in 1971's Diamonds Are Forever, and then again over a decade later in 1983's Never Say Never Again — a movie not backed by original production company Eon Productions, and thus considered officially non-canonical.
Tragically, Connery passed away at the age of 90 on October 31, 2020. As the world mourns the loss of the film legend, many are looking back upon his filmography — particularly the time he spent portraying the agent who likes things shaken and not stirred. Why did he pass the proverbial martini glass on to Lazenby, only to return for Diamonds Are Forever, then bid farewell to the core franchise? Here's the real reason why Sean Connery stopped playing James Bond.
Sean Connery grew tired of Bond
MGM
After portraying James Bond for so many years, Connery eventually grew tired of him — for a few reasons.
As detailed by Vanity Fair, in an interview held in 1964 (ahead of the release of Goldfinger), the actor offered up some choice words when describing Bond. "Remove the exotic touches and what have you got?" Connery said. "A dull, prosaic English policeman." It should be noted that Connery could have been purposely downplaying Bond's mystique in an act of humility, but many have taken those remarks as a sign he didn't think very highly of the character — at least at the time. November of that year found Connery singing a different song, telling The New York Times that he'd have an "everlasting" gratitude for James Bond.
However, a gear switched somewhere between then and November 1965, when Connery got even more candid about his feelings towards the character. "Bond's been good to me, so I shouldn't knock him," Connery reportedly told an interviewer before confessing that he was "fed up to here with the whole Bond bit." He even reportedly once said, "I have always hated that damned James Bond. I'd like to kill him" (via The Guardian).
Salary disputes reportedly factored in to Connery's unhappiness as well, as did tense discussions with executives about being properly compensated for his work in the films, according to Connery's comments during a 1971 interview with The Guardian. Adding fuel to the fire was the falling-out Connery had with producers Harry Saltzman and Albert "Cubby" R. Broccoli, again over Connery's salary.
Yet another reason Connery walked away from Bond? He was tired of the franchise not feeling grounded. "One of the reasons I stopped doing it was because I got really fed up with the space stuff and special effects. I just found it getting more and more influential in the movies," he said in 2005 (via The Irish Examiner).
One of Connery's close friends, fellow film icon Michael Caine, shed light on Connery's thoughts about Bond — revealing that the actor found it "upsetting" that so many people knew him as Bond and nothing more.
"If you were his friend in these early days, you didn't raise the subject of Bond. He was, and is, a much better actor than just playing James Bond, but he became synonymous with Bond. He'd be walking down the street and people would say, 'Look, there's James Bond,'" Caine once said (via The Wall Street Journal). "That was particularly upsetting to him."
As film fans know, Connery is indeed much more than James Bond. His diverse filmography spanned decades and featured roles in works like Murder on the Orient Express, The Man Who Would Be King, The Untouchables, Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade, The Hunt for Red October, Highlander, Highlander II: The Quickening, Rising Sun, Dragonheart, The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen, and many more.
He may be gone, but Sir Sean Connery will never be forgotten.
Recommended