The only problem is that I think Adam Aaron won’t do it because he loves this and actually being this pseudo-celebrity.Idk what to believe tbh
I don't trust that fukk on that program
Anything Gasparino says has me
I would hope he would do it because of how much money it would make the company pull them out of their debt fox already touting him as a genius but if this plays out they'll worship him.The only problem is that I think Adam Aaron won’t do it because he loves this and actually being this pseudo-celebrity.
Once this is over he just goes back to being the normal amc ceo and no one will give a Fukk
But then again he could issue more shares and no one would care because the squeeze is over
He serves us, the shareholders, making it his duty to meet our demands. Otherwise, we can sell en masse and restore his company’s share price to its former lows. I agree that he enjoys this, making him reluctant to surrender the spotlight, but a lot of investors will be displeased - most, I assume, and rightly so - if he drags his feet on anything within his power that can force the shorts to cover.The only problem is that I think Adam Aaron won’t do it because he loves this and actually being this pseudo-celebrity.
Once this is over he just goes back to being the normal amc ceo and no one will give a Fukk
But then again he could issue more shares and no one would care because the squeeze is over
As the CEO, yes he serves the shareholders (and he is one of the share holders too). But he did sell a big portion of his shares recently and he's an older guy so he might not care that much about the price of the shares or about keeping the job for that matter. Ultimately, his job is to run AMC, maximize profits, make sure it doesn't go bankrupt and grow the company. Apes are in it for the play, are traders and don't care about fundamentals. His whole job is fundamentals. If push comes to shove, shareholders could arrange to have him fired but i still think he cares more about running the business of AMC than the short squeeze (as he should).He serves us, the shareholders, making it his duty to meet our demands. Otherwise, we can sell en masse and restore his company’s share price to its former lows. I agree that he enjoys this, making him reluctant to surrender the spotlight, but a lot of investors will be displeased - most, I assume, and rightly so - if he drags his feet on anything within his power that can force the shorts to cover.
shyt yeah, I would've probably gotten out at that point wheb I first started. But now I've held and learned and seen how much this shyt can go. There's no way this thing isn't shorted to absolute hell. With 75-90% invested being retail.
He serves us, the shareholders, making it his duty to meet our demands. Otherwise, we can sell en masse and restore his company’s share price to its former lows. I agree that he enjoys this, making him reluctant to surrender the spotlight, but a lot of investors will be displeased - most, I assume, and rightly so - if he drags his feet on anything within his power that can force the shorts to cover.
yeah this
Elaborate, most of the things we discuss in here are events, scenarios that have been forecast since the infancy. The only illusion/speculation that remains is price.
