The 2012-2013 NBA Random Thoughts Thread

Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
3,960
Reputation
950
Daps
8,301
Reppin
NYC
pau duhon morris and earl clark and ebanks for la and mathews

cm-43635-050ec8c5ce0db2.gif
 

ThaBronxBully

Postin’ & Toastin’ Since 02’
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
31,197
Reputation
8,238
Daps
115,633
Reppin
NYC
Here's A Fair Deal

How Bout The Lakers Ride Out With The shytty Team They Thought Was Good Enough To Win A Championship?
 

Sensitive Blake Griffin

Banned
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
37,124
Reputation
2,633
Daps
67,708
lol @ lakers fans always thinking someone will take their trash so that they can become better. You made your bed now sleep in it you unbearable fakkits
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
85,676
Reputation
9,497
Daps
231,857
His production has gone down the last two seasons though, and in the sense that when he's not scoring what else does he bring to the table? He's not a great defender, rebounder, passer etc. He's just a good scorer who had his best years when his team was awful. His game does not apply pressure on a defense, doesn't get to the rim and just takes long jumpers for the most part.

His scoring has only gone down because he has taken less shots - an adjustment by design to balance out the offense. How can you say his game doesn't apply pressure to the defense when he's an elite perimeter threat and has been a 'top 10 scorer' over the last four seasons? The same level of reasoning can be applied to Tyreke who takes NOTHING but shots at the rim and is basically ineffectively everywhere else:

Evans -

3-9ft = 34%
10-15ft = 25%
16-3pt = 31%
3pt = 20%

Granger -

3-9ft = 40%
10-15ft = 37%
16-3pt = 37%
3pt = 37%

How can you say he doesn't apply pressure to the defense when Tyreke's %s are more likely to cause a defensive trickle-down effect?

I don't see it fam, they have the same chance of winning a title with Granger as they do with Evans, none. But, they have room for growth considering Evans age and his game can still be molded. Paul is still a year or two away from that next step, his shot selection and decision making are still questionable. And when Granger comes back, what are the odds he's going to take a backseat to George? If it weren't for him getting hurt Paul never would have developed as much as he has this season.

If you wanna go the direction of building for the future, then expiring-cap and picks would be a better avenue to go down. Not gambling on a player who's inabilites have got him doing the hokey pokey in the backcourt; in hopes of rectifying his game, which may never eventuate to the level they need (he hasn't shown any progression in 3 seasons), in order for them to compete. I don't see George taking a backseat, certainly not initially anyway. I see a even futher breakdown of a balanced offense with Hill being the only player to have a significant drop in FGA - with more focus on distribution and less focus on finding his own shot.
I'll take the attacking style of Evans with George and Hill, over a dude that just takes jumpers. The Pacers do not have anyone on their roster that can get to the rim, and that includes George (currently).

I'll take the player who's a proven experienced scorer and who can be a threat from all areas on the floor (not just at the rim).
 

GoldenGlove

😐😑😶😑😐
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
60,166
Reputation
5,830
Daps
141,683
Please somebody gif Tony Parker's face from this foul just now.

:laff:
 
Top