SOPA is reborn as the Intellectual Property Attaché Act

Mook

We should all strive to be like Mr. Rogers.
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
22,914
Reputation
2,420
Daps
58,553
Reppin
Raleigh
[ame]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZD-cS3ho5sw&feature=player_embedded[/ame]
 

Jello Biafra

A true friend stabs you in the front
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
46,184
Reputation
4,912
Daps
120,869
Reppin
Behind You
From MediaMatters:

Remember the Stop Online Piracy Act? It was the universally reviled anti-digital piracy bill that was coasting for a quick and quiet passage into law earlier this year until basically the entire internet rose up in protest. Now SOPA is coming back piece-by-piece, according to TechDirt, and if anyone is going to rise up in opposition this time, it should be the conservative media. Because the son of SOPA brings with it a dreaded "czar."

The new SOPA-fragment bill coming before Congress is the Intellectual Property Attaché Act, which strengthens the powers of the titular diplomatic attachés to promote U.S. copyright laws abroad. The language of the bill, which is sponsored by SOPA author Rep. Lamar Smith (R-TX), is similar to the section of SOPA that called for intellectual property attachés "to address intellectual property rights violations in the countries where the attachés are assigned."

The new bill, however, has an added provision requiring the president to "appoint an Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property, who shall report directly to the Director." In other words: an intellectual property czar.

There was a brief period back in 2009 when czars (advisors appointed by the president and not subject to Senate confirmation) were in the eyes of conservative journalists and pundits the epitome of the Obama administration's supposed capacity for anti-democratic, big-government tyranny. (Presidents, Republican and Democrat, have made extensive use of czars for decades.) Sean Hannity said the "unconfirmed, unvetted individuals are now at the helm of a shadow government right here in the U.S." Fox & Friends' Gretchen Carlson called them "czars-slash-kings," while Neil Cavuto suggested they be called "evil despots accountable to no one." Rush Limbaugh went full Godwin, as he is wont to do.

Now we have a Republican congressman proposing legislation that would require the president to appoint yet another tyrannical, shadowy, despotic, perhaps even Hitler-ish czar to manage intellectual property issues abroad. One would think that, given the previous bipartisan opposition to SOPA and the right's well-documented vehemence toward the very idea of czars, they should be the first ones reaching for the pitchforks, no?
 
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
1,137
Reputation
40
Daps
1,183
Reppin
NULL
I wonder where these congress people get the idea that America wants this. So the people of his district or whatever are clamoring for this idea? I think most people have other problems that they would like to be addressed first.:wtb:
 

Mook

We should all strive to be like Mr. Rogers.
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
22,914
Reputation
2,420
Daps
58,553
Reppin
Raleigh
I wonder where these congress people get the idea that America wants this. So the people of his district or whatever are clamoring for this idea? I think most people have other problems that they would like to be addressed first.:wtb:
Are you stupid? The people that bribe them want it so they'll try to push it though till its done.
 
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
1,137
Reputation
40
Daps
1,183
Reppin
NULL

Are you stupid? The people that bribe them want it so they'll try to push it though till its done.

Really??? You've made my point. The people dont want this shyt only special interests.

People have more info than ever to see what is really going on but we never hold the people that represent us accountable. The people of his district neeed to understand that he represents them and need to get rid of this scumbag. This going for all our representatives who vote this garbage in.
 
Top