Did he kick more ass in this one or the first one? That will decide if I go see it
he kicked less ass and got hands put on him
For real ?
I honestly think the critics expected nothing less than his bytch of an ex-wife getting blasted within the first half hour. Then having him go over her made things worse.
he kicked less ass and got paws put on him
fixed
I agree, i saw this shyt last night and it seemed hella short because it had less action. I remember when the end came up thinking "thats its? ". I remembered the whole thing from start to finish and thats unusual at least compared with the first one which had so much stuff going on.
All that being said at the end of the day its just an action flick and it was still good enough as an action flick just not that good when compared to the first Taken movie.
It wasn't too bad, but the whole......
"Just wait right here, I'll be right back for you" thing got OLD real quick. I found this one to be very predictable. The action was cool, and the fight scenes were alright though
Nah, what I found unrealistic was at the end when he was following Marco's father & the last goon into the building for his wife. When he walked in, there was a huge stairway with a giant opening. Dude was in open space for 10 seconds with no cover & no idea where they were. In real life, the goon wouldve sat, waited & sprayed his ass the minute he stepped in that room.
I looked at that whole scene like
so a movie where 1 dude takes on an army of thugs...and that one particular scene is what bothered you?
Movie is good. Critics had too high expectations for this film. Like it was a Cohen brothers film