Sickouts and Strike Threats Stopped the Government Shutdown

Ya' Cousin Cleon

OG COUCH CORNER HUSTLA
Joined
Jun 21, 2014
Messages
24,285
Reputation
-1,585
Daps
81,997
Reppin
Harvey World to Dallas, TX
Just last night, there was no end to the government shutdown in sight. But when airport workers started calling in sick and raising the threat of a strike, everything suddenly changed.

s recently as Thursday evening, elected officials were engaged in theatrical, go-nowhere resolutions with no real chance of reopening the government.

But by Friday afternoon, President Trump abruptly announced a deal to reopen the government, at least temporarily. What changed in less than twenty-four hours? Massively disruptive worker sickouts and the threat of strikes.

Earlier this week, Association of Flight Attendants (AFA) international president Sara Nelson raised the possibility of a general strike to fight the shutdown, and a group of aviation unions issued a dire warning that the aviation system’s safety was degrading.

Then on Friday, the second missed payday of the shutdown, a significant number of air traffic controllers called out from work, temporarily grounding all flights at New York’s LaGuardia airport and causing flight delays across the East Coast. A source inside the White House told CNN Friday that the flight delays were a “contributing catalyst” to the hasty deal.

As news of the delays spread, Nelson immediately raised the possibility that her union members might engage in a “suspension of service” due to safety concerns in an interview. She also told New York, “We’re mobilizing immediately …. If air traffic controllers can’t do their jobs, we can’t do ours.” She carefully avoided claiming the union was preparing to organize a strike, but the implication that there was a very real possibility of a work stoppage was clear.

Because of federal workers’ severe lack of labor rights and the fraught history of labor relations between air traffic controllers and the government in particular, we may never know the extent to which the call-outs were organized or how big they were. But given that they came on the symbolic date of federal workers’ second missed payday and followed a week of increasingly dramatic rhetoric from aviation-sector workers, some degree of worker coordination both within and across unions seems reasonable to assume.

And there is no other explanation for Trump and the Republicans’ quick reversal besides workers’ threat of disruption. They were comfortable introducing a bill with funding for a border wall — which they knew would not pass — on Thursday. But mere hours after workers threatened to disrupt the country’s aviation system, the Right immediately reopened the government. In fact, such action is exactly what the Right itself predicted it would take to end the shutdown.

Many federal workers will understandably want to simply return to work and put the lockout behind them. But the shutdown and the way it ended show that it is critical for federal workers to keep organizing.

The fact that the lockout was able to go on so long without an effective response will embolden the Republicans to use the tactic again. In fact, Trump’s proposal only funds the government through February 15, at which point the whole thing could start over if no permanent agreement is reached. And while legislation to provide back pay to government subcontractors — many of whom are low-wage workers — has been proposed, the deal as it stands does not provide for them.

But the speed with which Trump folded when faced with a serious disruption to business as usual at workers’ initiative shows how much power federal workers have — if they come together and figure out how to use it.


Sickouts and Strike Threats Stopped the Government Shutdown
 

Rarely-Wrong Liggins

Name another Liggins hot I'm just honest.
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
35,842
Reputation
12,538
Daps
137,610
Reppin
Staff
Interesting, I would expect these airport workers to strike much quicker if there’s another potential shutdown. They got the juice

They also have the sympathy of the American people, even the TSA. Any shutdown that threatens even one paycheck will be met with significant pushback.
 

ELESDEE616

Nikkas snitch on the coli like they name is Kobe
Supporter
Joined
Mar 3, 2017
Messages
5,150
Reputation
-115
Daps
19,607
Reppin
Kobe snitched on Shaq
46962181_2425855470776452_3529245137601298432_n.jpg
 

the cac mamba

Veteran
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
100,506
Reputation
13,411
Daps
294,053
Reppin
NULL
i'd like to see them get out ahead of this next one :ehh: CNN needs to get these union heads on the air and tell the country that they won't accept trump shutting down the government in 3 weeks
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,656
Daps
203,821
Reppin
the ether
i'd like to see them get out ahead of this next one :ehh: CNN needs to get these union heads on the air and tell the country that they won't accept trump shutting down the government in 3 weeks

I think he's already shook. He'd declare a state of emergency or some crap before allowing another shutdown so soon. Them getting out ahead is one thing, but him shutting again after it failed the first time, leading to them striking, leading to airport shutdowns and looming economic downturn, would result in total public outcry. I don't think it really even matters what Trump does, at that point Senate Republicans would turn heel and pass a veto-proof spending bill just to save their own necks.
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,656
Daps
203,821
Reppin
the ether
p.s. - as I've said before, nonviolent protest can be extraordinarily powerful when it has economic impact. This was a very small example, but notice how even the mere slowdown of a single major airport was enough to do what the Senate and House and the will of 60% of the American people could not do.

A few hundred people had more power than the entire federal legislature, more power than a couple hundred million Americans, solely because they were willing to risk themselves in a way that had an economic impact.

If the Black community was willing to move this way, to refuse to work for certain parties and refuse to buy from others, or willing to refuse to fund certain oppressive municipalities, the community could wield incredible power without the help of a single politician or a single act of violence.

I desperately want an action to defund Ferguson-like city departments who pay their bills by fining the Black community to death. Identify a community that is clearly oppressing their Black population with unjust overzealous fines, pick one of the worst ones, and get the entire community to put their foot down and refuse to pay all fines, refuse to attend all court dates, until something changes. They can't throw everyone in jail. They'd try set some examples, but if everyone stayed strong then making an example out of a few dozen people won't do shyt when thousands are refusing to pay. Some of these departments make millions off of fining poor Black people, it's a huge part of their budget, refuse to pay and they'll eventually crack even if it takes a few months.

That would be the beginning of some real change.
 
Top