She rly was dealt a GOAT hand. Pretty, Sexy, Smart (almost a genius)if iq means anything.
She could've been anything she wanted to be, she chose to be an actress and to be tricked by directors into getting naked on camera dozens of times
i wouldn't go that farShe’s one of the best actresses of her era
i wouldn't go that far
FIXEDShe rly was dealt a GOAT hand. Pretty, Sexy, Smart (almost a genius)if iq means anything.
She could've been anything she wanted to be, she chose to be an actress and to be "tricked" by directors into getting naked on camera dozens of times
The " " are redundant because i added "a dozen times" to my pointFIXED
If a chick want to be horizontal for a paycheck, who am I to stop.her or judge her
Her best role was in Casino to me.Your entitled to your opinion
I enjoy watching some of her 90’s films not just because she was hot but because she holds my interest whenever she’s on the screen with her talent
She has that “it” factor
Her best role was in Casino to me.
You want her doing realistic portraiture when she can take a photo?Meh....abstract art is 2 easy it's lame
Nope. But it seems like whites are heavy into abstract art...big time. I use it too but I always add humanoid figures to move away from their kind. It's not bad at all. But I knew as soon as it said artist..I knew it would be abstract expressionism.You want her doing realistic portraiture when she can take a photo?
I wouldn't say its shallow and pedantic...very visually predictable when whites paint and are not classically trained....here come the art critics
indeed, her art is shallow and pedantic