SCIENCE: Quantum relativitiy and General relativitiy may have been solved. Maybe.
- Thread starter Secure Da Bag
- Start date
TheWiseWon
Pro
This paper seems to be complete BS 
This video is about a critique of a recently published paper claiming a new theory of everything. The paper is titled "On the Same Origin of Quantum Physics and General Relativity from Remanion Geometry and Plank Scale Formalism". The author of the video, Sabine Hossenfelder, is a physicist who specializes in theoretical physics and general relativity.
The video starts with Hossenfelder explaining that many people requested her to comment on this new paper. The paper claims to unify quantum physics and general relativity, explain why galaxies form so early, why there are more large structures in the universe and the gravitational wave background, and also quantize gravity.
Hossenfelder then goes through the paper pointing out various errors and inconsistencies. For example, the authors claim that if mass can create curvature, then curvature can also create mass. However, Hossenfelder argues that this contradicts Einstein's field equations.
Next, Hossenfelder criticizes the authors' notation and mathematical expressions, pointing out typos and a lack of understanding of the concepts involved. For instance, the authors use the same symbol for different quantities and introduce unnecessary variables.
Hossenfelder concludes that the paper is complete nonsense and should not have been published. She argues that the equations in the paper are mathematically incorrect and do not make sense. She also criticizes the fact that such poorly written papers get published in scientific journals.
The video starts with Hossenfelder explaining that many people requested her to comment on this new paper. The paper claims to unify quantum physics and general relativity, explain why galaxies form so early, why there are more large structures in the universe and the gravitational wave background, and also quantize gravity.
Hossenfelder then goes through the paper pointing out various errors and inconsistencies. For example, the authors claim that if mass can create curvature, then curvature can also create mass. However, Hossenfelder argues that this contradicts Einstein's field equations.
Next, Hossenfelder criticizes the authors' notation and mathematical expressions, pointing out typos and a lack of understanding of the concepts involved. For instance, the authors use the same symbol for different quantities and introduce unnecessary variables.
Hossenfelder concludes that the paper is complete nonsense and should not have been published. She argues that the equations in the paper are mathematically incorrect and do not make sense. She also criticizes the fact that such poorly written papers get published in scientific journals.