say breh's, Daredevil the movie was not that bad

Beer Drinker

Blue Moon Cappuccino Oatmeal Stout
Supporter
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
9,967
Reputation
2,016
Daps
45,930
Reppin
NYC
I disagree 100%. Colin Farrell chewing the scenery every time he's on screen alone is enough to condemn the movie
 

Kuwka_Atcha_Ratcha

Superstar
Joined
Jul 17, 2012
Messages
13,684
Reputation
-4,185
Daps
16,496
Reppin
NULL
:ehh: Never felt it was that bad of a super hero for what it was. Although the Directors Cut is a way better version of the movie as a whole.
that's exactly what I just watched the directors cut, its long as hell. I cant remember the original what did the directors cut add
 

Young Bishop

Piff Poster
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
105,688
Reputation
11,295
Daps
246,107
Reppin
Broward County
that's exactly what I just watched the directors cut, its long as hell. I cant remember the original what did the directors cut add

Mainly some scenes were out of place from what I recall.
The DC version puts them in order with extended scenes not including the deleted scenes.
 

Art Barr

INVADING SOHH CHAMPION
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
65,910
Reputation
13,002
Daps
92,160
Reppin
CHICAGO
the original cut is gawd awful.
yet, the director's cut with the missing coolio arc makes it a bit more tolerable an experience.
Halle is better as catwoman than Affleck as daredevil.
matt Damon should have and is the perfect cast as daredevil.
plus, Damon actually mirrors Murdock visually and in acting demeanor.
Affleck has no way to connect as a superhero.
which is why, I think they will ruin batman/superman with this casting.


Art Barr
 
Last edited:
Top