Brian Tyler Cohen (@briantylercohen.bsky.social)
Sarah Palin just lost her defamation case against the New York Times again. đ: https://www.msnbc.com/deadline-white-house/deadline-legal-blog/sarah-palin-new-york-times-verdict-jury-trial-defamation-case-rcna202362

Sarah Palin loses defamation retrial against New York Times
April 22, 2025, 2:50 PM CDT / Updated April 22, 2025, 3:07 PM CDTBy Jordan Rubin
3â4 minutes
Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin lost her defamation retrial against The New York Times over a 2017 editorial she said damaged her reputation, Reuters reported on Tuesday.
The federal jury found the media company not liable after deliberating for about two hours.
Palin, a former Republican vice presidential nominee, lost a previous trial in 2022 against the media company but won a new one due to âseveral major issuesâ in the case, as a federal appellate panel put it last year.
Palinâs lawsuit stemmed from an editorial called âAmericaâs Lethal Politics,â which compared two political shootings: the 2011 killing of six people and the injury of 13 others in Arizona, including then-Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, a Democrat; and the 2017 Virginia shooting that seriously injured four people, including Rep. Steve Scalise, R-La., at a congressional baseball game practice.
The Times editorial argued there was a clear and direct link between the Arizona shooting and the political incitement arising from a digital graphic published in March 2010 by Palinâs political action committee. The graphic was a map that superimposed crosshairs over 20 congressional districts represented by Democrats, including Giffordsâ.
But a relationship between the crosshairs map and the shooting âwas never established,â as the appeals court wrote last year, adding that the incident was rather âviewed as a tragic resultâ of the shooterâs serious mental illness. (A correction on the editorial currently reads: âAn editorial on Thursday about the shooting of Representative Steve Scalise incorrectly stated that a link existed between political rhetoric and the 2011 shooting of Representative Gabby Giffords. In fact, no such link was established. The editorial also incorrectly described a map distributed by a political action committee before that shooting. It depicted electoral districts, not individual Democratic lawmakers, beneath stylized cross hairs.â)
The Times said in a statement after the appellate ruling last year, âThis decision is disappointing. Weâre confident we will prevail in a retrial.â