S.T.A.L.K.E.R. 2: Heart of Chornobyl (PC, Xbox Series X|S) (November 20, 2024)

O³ (O cubed)

No more PAWGs, PLEASE??!!!??
Joined
Mar 8, 2017
Messages
17,161
Reputation
3,752
Daps
63,027
Reppin
Hackney, London
Don’t know if “blame” is the word but if their job is supposedly to inform their audience then what good is reviewing a product the audience will never touch?

Don’t know if “fault” is the right word. But the current review process leads to stupid stuff like this happening.
Ok, the developers shouldn't have given anybody any review codes until they fixed the bugs in the game.

For them to have a Day 0 patch, means that they knew the game they gave to reviewers ran like shyt.
 

MeachTheMonster

YourFriendlyHoodMonster
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
69,270
Reputation
3,734
Daps
109,118
Reppin
Tha Land
Ok, the developers shouldn't have given anybody any review codes until they fixed the bugs in the game.

For them to have a Day 0 patch, means that they knew the game they gave to reviewers ran like shyt.
Publishers NEED that day one marketing push.

A publisher that had more money/better relationship with reviewers/influencers would have had more options in getting the reviewers more updated code or even flying them out to review the game at better circumstances.

You guys keep searching for fault, so sure blame the publisher, but it’s more a symptom of a broken system than anything.
 

MeachTheMonster

YourFriendlyHoodMonster
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
69,270
Reputation
3,734
Daps
109,118
Reppin
Tha Land
Seems like the fault of the publisher not reviewers :yeshrug:

reviewers have a job to inform potential buyers on the day of release of their experience with the game. If the game gets fixed after release than there’s no one else to blame
Game was fixed before release. Consumers never got a chance to see the version they wrote the reviews on.
 

O³ (O cubed)

No more PAWGs, PLEASE??!!!??
Joined
Mar 8, 2017
Messages
17,161
Reputation
3,752
Daps
63,027
Reppin
Hackney, London
Publishers NEED that day one marketing push.

A publisher that had more money/better relationship with reviewers/influencers would have had more options in getting the reviewers more updated code or even flying them out to review the game at better circumstances.

You guys keep searching for fault, so sure blame the publisher, but it’s more a symptom of a broken system than anything.
I don't understand your argument. Reviewers can only review the game that they got.

You can fight the system but in this case the game is the game. (Even though the game isn't the released game 😁)

I hope that you enjoy it
 

MeachTheMonster

YourFriendlyHoodMonster
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
69,270
Reputation
3,734
Daps
109,118
Reppin
Tha Land
I don't understand your argument. Reviewers can only review the game that they got.

You can fight the system but in this case the game is the game. (Even though the game isn't the released game 😁)

I hope that you enjoy it
Some larger reviewers held their score or final verdict until they had some time with the updated version.

That’s obviously the correct course of action. But reviewers need clicks for money too so they can’t afford to hold their reviews until after the initial 12 hours or so of hype.

My argument was in the first post. The game review process is more about hype/clicks/money than informing consumers.
 

Killer Instinct

To live in hearts we leave behind is to never die.
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
34,016
Reputation
12,019
Daps
156,880
Reppin
LWO
Downloaded this on PC via Gamepss but I'm not touching until it's patched up more. Reading about too many bugs. I'll play it when it's actually done. :yeshrug:
 
Top