RUSSIA/РОССИЯ THREAD—ASSANGE CHRGD W/ SPYING—DJT IMPEACHED TWICE-US TREASURY SANCTS KILIMNIK AS RUSSIAN AGNT

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
307,466
Reputation
-34,327
Daps
618,036
Reppin
The Deep State
:ALERTRED:

How former MI6 spy Christopher Steele revealed dossier details to old friend from espionage world

How a former MI6 spy revealed Christopher Steele dossier details to an old friend from the world of espionage


The detached house on a suburban street in Wimbledon was an incongruous venue for a meeting about spies, secrets and the incoming president of the United States.

But it was here, at a £1.7 million South London home, that former MI6 agent Christopher Steele came a week after Donald Trump’s shock election victory in November 2016 on what he saw as a mission of national security.

For months Mr Steele, once in charge of MI6’s Russia desk but now approaching a decade out of the service, had been grappling with astonishing intelligence he had collated about the Trump campaign.

Contracted by a Washington DC-based research firm to investigate Mr Trump before the election, Mr Steele had put feelers out to around 20 sources about his Russia ties that summer and autumn.

What came back was explosive. Allegations of suspect meetings between Trump advisers and Russians, a Kremlin drive to tilt the election in Mr Trump’s favour, and, perhaps most worrying of all, alleged “kompromat” on the candidate himself.

With Mr Trump now heading for the White House for certain, Mr Steele decided it was his obligation - his national duty - to alert the British Government about what he had found.

The Steele dossier would trigger an FBI investigation, eventually taken over by special counsel Robert Mueller.


Mr Mueller’s report later found Trump campaign figures expected to benefit from some Kremlin actions, though said there was no criminal conspiracy.

The Wimbledon house belonged to Sir Charles Farr, the chair of the Joint Intelligence Committee - the body in charge of assessing intelligence.

He had also been one of Mrs May’s top counter-terrorism advisers at the Home Office.

Mr Steele knew Farr personally. They had been acquainted for two decades, regularly crossing paths over the years.


Farr, who died of cancer aged 59 in February this year, had - like Steele - begun his career as an MI6 officer. Farr would know what to do.

Together they looked at what Mr Steele had brought - more than a dozen memos originally sent to his client, Fusion GPS, spelling out in detail the alleged Trump-Kremlin links.

For hours, the pair worked through the information - now collectively known as the ‘Steele dossier’ - line by line.

Farr would ask questions, Mr Steele would spell out what he knew.

Friends close to Mr Steele said that far from being dismissed immediately as faulty or fake - as Mr Trump and his allies now see his dossier - the findings were treated with gravity.

By the end of an exhaustive day of discussion, Farr himself reached his own conclusion. The dossier had to go up the chain of command.

Within days, according to well-placed sources, the allegations were shared with the most senior intelligence figures in the country.

It is understood that Alex Younger, the MI6 chief, and Andrew Parker, the MI5 director general, were informed of the dossier.

Mr Steele’s decision to act had not come overnight.

Ever since the first information on the Trump campaign reached his office in the summer of 2016 he had committed to alerting the FBI. Mr Steele was confident in the raw intelligence coming back from his chain of around half a dozen ‘collectors’, who in turn reached out to their own sources.

The company Mr Steele co-founded, Orbis International, had a long-established relationship with the FBI and was actually working with the bureau on an unrelated project that summer.

Mr Steele met with FBI agents before the US election, spelling out his findings.

Yet as the vote approached, he was unsure they were treating the information seriously enough.

Three times before the election Mr Steele went to Washington DC, partly to meet with his clients Fusion GPS.

Each time he believed he was risking his life.

“He feared that either the Russians or the Trump team had found out what he was doing and that they could take physical reprisals,” a friend of Mr Steele said.


He thought the odds of that were low - Mr Steele is said to have put the chance of an attack at 5 per cent. But it was a possibility nonetheless.

Before the election, his focus had been on alerting the Americans. But afterwards, with Mr Trump no longer a candidate but president-elect, it was a national security issue for Britain.

Around 10 days after Mr Steele’s first meeting with Farr another was scheduled. The venue, again, was Farr’s Wimbledon home.

There were follow-up questions, according to those familiar with the meeting.

But also new information - two new memos Mr Steele had written, one detailing how the Russians were allegedly trying to block Mitt Romney’s possible appointment as US secretary of state.

Britain’s spy chiefs had a decision - should they tell Theresa May? The Prime Minister, installed in Number 10 some four months earlier after the Brexit referendum, was well acquainted with classified information from her Home Office days.

Farr, who had until 2015, headed up the Home Office’s Office Security and Counter Terrorism, was a trusted adviser.

She also may have known Mr Steele, who served for 22 years before leaving MI6 in 2009. Mrs May’s role in dealing with the inquest into the murder of Alexander Litvinenko, the ex-Russian intelligence officer poisoned on British soil in 2006, would likely have made her aware of Mr Steele’s work.

There was a regular flow of sensitive documents - marked official, classified, secret or top secret - in Mrs May’s in-tray during her early time in Downing Street, according to figures familiar with her workload.

The most sensitive were printed on yellow paper. Sources familiar with the events said that Mr Steele’s information was “marked up to the top”.

And yet Mrs May was not briefed on the dossier, insiders at Number 10 insist.The exact reason is unknown. Mr Trump himself was also in the dark.

The president-elect would only be briefed on the Steele dossier on January 6, when James Comey, then FBI director, requested a one-on-one meeting in Trump Tower.

But then, just days later, the situation being changed again. Buzzfeed had got its hands on the full Steele dossier and published the lot, unredacted, on its website on January 10.

Even the most salacious of claims - that Mr Trump had asked prostitutes to perform a lurid sex act in a Moscow hotel room in 2013, something he has always since denied - were there for everyone to read.

Any doubt about how the president-elect would react was expelled the following day.

Speaking at a press conference, Mr Trump did little to hide his fury, calling Buzzfeed a “failing pile of garbage” and labelling his own intelligence agencies “disgraceful” for allowing the material to leak out.

“That’s something that Nazi Germany would have done and did do,” he added.

A fortnight later Mrs May flew to Washington.

Standing side-by-side with Mr Trump just days after his inauguration, she heaped praise on the new US president.

“I’m delighted to be able to congratulate you on what was a stunning election victory,” Mrs May said, adding later: “We have already struck up a good relationship.”

And to seal their newfound friendship, an offer - an invitation on behalf of the Queen of a UK state visit. Next month, two and a half years later, it will finally be taken up.


@88m3 @ADevilYouKhow @wire28 @dtownreppin214
@DonKnock @dza @wire28 @BigMoneyGrip @Dameon Farrow @re'up @Blackfyre @Cali_livin @NY's #1 Draft Pick
 
Last edited:

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
307,466
Reputation
-34,327
Daps
618,036
Reppin
The Deep State
:ALERTRED:

Mueller agents given UK approval to interview Christopher Steele in London over Donald Trump dossier


Mueller agents given UK approval to interview Christopher Steele in London over Donald Trump dossier


The British Government gave approval for US investigators to interview a former MI6 agent over his dossier detailing Donald Trump’s alleged ties to Russia, it can be disclosed.

Christopher Steele, who wrote the dossier, was interviewed in London by US officials working with Robert Mueller, the special counsel investigating Russian interference in the US presidential election.

According to well-placed sources, the UK Government gave the greenlight to the officials to travel to London to record Mr Steele’s testimony.


Mr Steele, who ran MI6’s Russia desk and had been a station chief in Moscow, has not travelled to the US since news of the existence dossier became public.

Mr Steele gave detailed testimony for more than 12 hours to two counter-intelligence officers from Mr Mueller’s team in September 2017.

The discussions were spread over two days. At the time of the meeting Mr Trump was publicly attacking the investigation into his campaign’s links to Russia as a “witch hunt” led by “very bad and conflicted people”.

The decision by the Government to authorise the visit by Mueller’s team suggests that officials in the UK took a more serious view of the allegations being made by the ex-MI6 chief - in marked contrast to Mr Trump’s take on the dossier.

Mr Steele met with the two officials - one of whom he had known from previous work, according to friends - in The Grosvenor Hotel, an upmarket hotel in central London, close to Mr Steele’s company offices.

Gathering in one of the hotel’s meeting rooms, Mr Steele gave a more candid description of where the allegations in his dossier had come from, according to those familiar with the meeting.

The hotel was chosen amid fears that the London office of Mr Steele’s company Orbis Business Intelligence could be bugged by adversaries,
however low the risk.

A friend of Mr Steele said: “This is London not Moscow. There’s a 10 per cent chance that it is bugged but that’s still 10 per cent.”

The friend said Mr Steele was “doing his duty” in briefing Mueller’s staff and pointed out the significance of the meeting in London being facilitated by UK authorities.

Throughout the interview, which took up all of one day and much of the second day, the US officials took notes.

The existence of the meeting has been reported before but not its details. T
he disclosure follows this newspaper’s revelation that British spy chiefs were briefed on the dossier before Mr Trump knew of its existence, triggering a backlash from some supporters.

The revelations risk deteriorating UK-US relations ahead of Mr Trump’s state visit next month.

Mr Steele gave a copy of the dossier, containing 17 separate memos, to Sir Charles Farr, who was one of Theresa May’s most trusted security advisers, in November 2016, about a week after Mr Trump was elected president.

The dossier was then passed up the chain to the heads of MI5 and MI6, according to sources. Mr Trump only became aware of Mr Steele’s dossier, which included an allegation strenuously denied by Mr Trump that he hired prostitutes to perform a lurid sex act in a Moscow hotel, in January 2017 when alerted by the FBI before taking office.

Sebastian Gorka, the former deputy assistant to the president in Mr Trump’s White House, criticised British intelligence services over their handling of the Steele dossier.

Mr Gorka told The Daily Telegraph: “Heads must roll politically in the UK if we are to have any hope of salvaging the ‘special relationship’.”

Approached with details of the meeting, a spokesman for the special counsel’s office declined to comment.

How the infamous Trump dossier row unfolded

June 2016
Christopher Steele is hired by Furion GPS, a research firm in Washington DC, to look into
Trump ties to Russia. Fusion GPS is being paid by lawyers for Hillary Clinton’s campaign.

July 2016
Sources begin to report back to Mr Steele about shocking allegations including that the
Russians have “kompromat” on Mr Trump. He decides to inform the FBI.

Summer/Autumn 2016
Mr Steele writes 17 memos, now known as his ‘dossier’, for Fusion GPS spelling out the
intelligence in detail. He also communicates what he has found to the FBI.

November 8 2016
Mr Trump unexpectedly wins the US election, defeating Mrs Clinton. Mr Steele decides
his findings are a matter of national security and must be flagged to the UK government.

Mid-November 2016
Around a week after the election, Mr Steele meets with Sir Charles Farr, the chair of
the Joint Intelligence Committee, and takes him through his intelligence.

Late November 2016
Farr and Mr Steele meet for a second time to further discuss the memos. The heads of MI6
and MI5 are briefed on the dossier around this period.

January 6 2017
Mr Trump is told for the first time about the dossier in a one-on-one briefing with
James Comey, then FBI director. He strenuously denies some of the key allegations.

January 10 2017
Buzzfeed publishes 35 pages of Mr Steele’s memos online. One part claims the Russians
have a tape of Mr Trump getting prostitutes to perform a lurid sex act in a Moscow hotel room.

January 11 2017
At a heated press conference Mr Trump denies the tape claim, saying he is a
“germaphobe”, and calls Buzzfeed a “failing pile of garbage” for publishing the dossier.

January 27 2017
Theresa May visits Washington just a week after Mr Trump’s inauguration, becoming
the first world leader hosted in his White House. She also offers him a UK state visit.
 

Poetical Poltergeist

Precise and cold hearted
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
36,910
Reputation
5,370
Daps
120,537
Reppin
Mile in the Sky
Trump ass about to step down. Dude not trying to give up them financial docs :russ:
He ain't stepping down anytime soon bruh. He will lie about the records being doctored by the libs, claim Obama appointed judges are corrupt etc etc. This man will not resign unless the repubs turn on him. Which isn't happening.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
307,466
Reputation
-34,327
Daps
618,036
Reppin
The Deep State
:ALERTRED::ALERTRED::ALERTRED::ALERTRED:






Confidential draft IRS memo says tax returns must be given to Congress unless president invokes executive privilege
Josh Dawsey
UGPU4GTAWUI6TP5NG2T6WNWLMA.jpg


A confidential Internal Revenue Service legal memo says tax returns must be given to Congress unless the president takes the rare step of asserting executive privilege, according to a copy of the memo obtained by The Washington Post.

The memo contradicts the Trump administration’s justification for denying lawmakers’ request for President Trump’s tax returns, exposing fissures in the executive branch.


Trump has refused to turn over his tax returns but has not invoked executive privilege. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin has instead denied the returns by arguing there is no legislative purpose for demanding them.

But according to the IRS memo, which has not been previously reported, the disclosure of tax returns to the committee “is mandatory, requiring the Secretary to disclose returns, and return information, requested by the tax-writing Chairs.”

The 10-page document says the law “does not allow the Secretary to exercise discretion in disclosing the information provided the statutory conditions are met” and directly rejects the reason Mnuchin has cited for withholding the information.


“[T]he Secretary’s obligation to disclose return and return information would not be affected by the failure of a tax writing committee . . . to state a reason for the request,” it says. It adds that the “only basis the agency’s refusal to comply with a committee’s subpoena would be the invocation of the doctrine of executive privilege.”

The memo is the first sign of potential dissent within the administration over its approach to the tax returns issue. The IRS said the memo, titled “Congressional Access to Returns and Return Information,” was a draft document written by a lawyer in the Office of Chief Counsel and did not represent the agency’s “official position.” The memo is stamped “DRAFT,” it is not signed, and it does not reference Trump.

[Read the memo.]

The agency says the memo was prepared in the fall. At the time, Democrats were making clear they probably would seek copies of Trump’s tax returns under a 1924 law that states that the treasury secretary “shall furnish” tax returns to Congress.

Precisely who wrote the memo and reviewed it could not be learned. The agency says IRS Commissioner Charles Rettig and current chief counsel Michael Desmond, who was confirmed by the Senate in February, were not familiar with it until a Post inquiry this week. The IRS says it was never forwarded to Treasury.

Executive privilege is generally defined as the president’s ability to deny requests for information about internal administration talks and deliberations.

On Friday, Mnuchin rejected a subpoena from the House Ways and Means Committee to turn over the tax returns, a move that probably will now lead to a court battle. Mnuchin has criticized the demands as harassment that could be directed against any political enemy, arguing Congress lacks a “legitimate legislative purpose” in seeking the documents.

Breaking with precedent, Trump has refused to provide tax returns, saying without evidence they are under audit.

Mnuchin and other senior staff members never reviewed the IRS memo, according to a Treasury spokesman. But the spokesman said it did not undermine the department’s argument that handing over the president’s tax returns would run afoul of the Constitution’s mandate that information given to Congress must pertain to legislative issues.

The spokesman said the secretary is following a legal analysis from the Justice Department that he “may not produce the requested private tax return information.” Both agencies have denied requests for copies of the Justice Department’s advice to Treasury.

Some legal experts said the memo provides further evidence that the Trump administration is using shaky legal foundations to withhold the tax returns.

“The memo is clear in its interpretation of the law that the IRS shall furnish this information,” said William Lowrance, who served for about two decades as an attorney in the IRS chief counsel’s office and reviewed the memo at the request of The Post.

Daniel Hemel, a professor at the University of Chicago Law School who also reviewed the memo for The Post, said the document suggests a split over Trump’s returns between career staffers at the IRS and political appointees at that agency and the Treasury Department.

“The memo writer’s interpretation is that the IRS has no wiggle room on this,” Hemel said. “Mnuchin is saying the House Ways and Means Committee has not asserted a legitimate legislative purpose. The memo says they don’t have to assert a legitimate legislative purpose — or any purpose at all.”

The administration has resisted a range of House inquiries, although a federal judge on Monday ruled the president’s accounting firm must turn over his financial records to Congress.

Treasury Department officials said there had been extensive discussions about the tax return issue, with one official saying the issue put the agency in a difficult spot because Trump has predetermined the outcome — and because Mnuchin is a Trump ally who was the finance chair of his 2016 campaign.

“The decision has been made,” this official said, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss private conversations. “Now it’s up to us to try to justify it.”

Trump has told advisers he will battle the issue to the Supreme Court, according to people familiar with the matter. Trump recently has argued that the tax returns were an issue in the 2016 election but that because he won they should no longer be of concern.

Last week, Mnuchin told a Senate panel that Treasury Department lawyers held an early discussion about disclosing the tax returns long before Democrats officially demanded the documents in April. He did not reveal details of that deliberation or say what, if any, legal memos he had reviewed.

Some legal experts have held that the law is clear in giving Congress the power to compel the provision of the returns. But other former government lawyers, including two who served in the Reagan and George H.W. Bush administrations, have argued that the law is unconstitutional and could lead to widespread abuses of taxpayer privacy for political aims.

The IRS memo describes how and why Congress has the authority to access tax returns, explaining the origin of the provision and how it has been interpreted over the decades.

It highlights the special powers given to three committees for compelling the release of tax returns: the House Ways and Means Committee, the Senate Finance Committee, and the Joint Committee on Taxation. Other congressional committees, the memo emphasizes, do not have the same authority.

When it comes to the Ways and Means Committee, the obligation to divulge the returns “would not be affected by the failure” to give a reason for the request. By contrast, other committees “must include a purpose for their request for returns and return information when seeking access,” the memo states.

“One potential basis” for refusing the returns, the memo states, would be if the administration invoked the doctrine of executive privilege.

But the IRS memo notes that executive privilege is most often invoked to protect information, such as opinions and recommendations, submitted as part of formulating policies and decisions. It even says the law “might be read to preclude a claim of executive privilege,” meaning the law could be interpreted as saying executive privilege cannot be invoked to deny a subpoena.

Earlier this month, the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service published a review of Section 6103 of the Internal Revenue Code that found the code “evinces no substantive limitations” on the Ways and Means Committee’s authority to receive the tax returns.

But, the CRS report added, the committee’s authority “arguably is subject to the same legal limitations that generally attach to Congress’ use of other compulsory investigative tools,” including the need to serve some “legislative purpose” and not breach constitutional rights.

Damian Paletta contributed to this report.
 
Last edited:
Top