RUSSIA/РОССИЯ THREAD—ASSANGE CHRGD W/ SPYING—DJT IMPEACHED TWICE-US TREASURY SANCTS KILIMNIK AS RUSSIAN AGNT

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
305,743
Reputation
-34,224
Daps
616,014
Reppin
The Deep State
PART 2:



contract-ferrell-sig-sm.jpg

Sources: Trump campaign contract; NRA contract / Daniel Nass
Ferrell, Kovatch, Angle, and Kowalski did not respond to requests for comment. According to their National Media bios or LinkedIn pages, all are specialists in the art of strategic media placement. Ferrell’s “efforts help [National Media] provide optimal financial stewardship of campaign media budgets.” Kovatch “has consistently bought the largest media markets around the country, building an extensive knowledge of ratings, costs and seasonal trends across all time periods and dayparts.” Angle uses his “extensive experience” to “strategically place efficient and effective media buys for our clients.” And Kowalski “acted as a liaison between media buyers and TV, radio, and cable networks,” and “researched voter demographic data to help create” advertising campaigns for, among others, “presidential” candidates and “issue-advocacy groups.”

Prior reporting has identified consulting firms as conduits for potentially illegal coordination between campaigns and outside groups.
In 2013, a Center for Public Integrity and NBC News investigation turned up evidence that an AMAG media buyer purchased airtime both for a Texas congressional candidate and for an outside group that was supporting him. In July, we found that the NRA had been using an apparent shell firm called Starboard Strategic Inc. to produce ads for Senate candidates who employed a GOP consulting outfit called OnMessage Inc. The two entities, according to subsequent complaints filed to the FEC, are “functionally indistinguishable.” Starboard and OnMessage are located in the same Alexandria buildings as National Media, according to public records.

The FEC has the authority to launch investigations and seek civil penalties, but it’s unlikely that the NRA or the Trump campaign will face any official action. The FEC’s four commissioners—it is supposed to have six—have been deadlocked for years in an ideological split, making the unanimous vote required for significant investigations almost impossible to achieve.
The Department of Justice is also authorized to launch investigations, but prosecutions under the Federal Election Campaign Act are uncommon. If convicted, violators can be subject to criminal fines and up to five years in prison.

Experts say the apparent coordination is the most glaring they’ve ever seen.

“It is impossible for these consultants to have established firewalls in their brains,” Brendan Fischer, the director of the Federal Reform Program at the Campaign Legal Center, said. “We have not previously seen this level of evidence undermining any claim of a firewall.”

contract-trump-clinton-sm.jpg

Sources: Trump campaign contract; NRA contract / Daniel Nass
Effectively placing ads is among the most important tasks in getting a candidate elected to office. “The creative content is only part of the equation,” said Rick Wilson, a Republican media strategist. “Political advertising relies on smart media placement at every stage. Anything else and you might as well just throw your money in a bonfire.”

Campaign coordination, Wilson added, allows candidates and outside groups to “maximize their resources,” making spending far more efficient. “Modern campaigns are driven by data,” he said. “Pollsters and analytics people will give you a set of targets, and you want to address those targets as best you can, in as many markets as you can.”

Concurrent purchases by Red Eagle and AMAG appear to have been designed to provide such a higher return on spending.
On September 15, 2016, for instance, Red Eagle executed an $86,000 deal for the NRA with Raycom Sports Network, a syndicator of sports programs, for slots during seven ACC college football games airing during the final weeks of the presidential race. Documents authorizing the purchase were signed by Ferrell, whose colleague Ben Angle, the senior buyer at National Media, has been a proponent of sports as a way to reach conservative audiences. “Every time we assist a Republican candidate, we advise him to advertise at sports events,” he told one journalist. “In sports, the audience is engaged, they like to see it live so they do not skip the commercials by using a recording device.”

Less than a week later, another National Media staffer authorized virtually the same purchase for Trump. Because stations are required to charge candidates the so-called “lowest unit price” for airtime (while charging independent groups the higher market rate), the deal only cost $30,000.


The purchases were mirror images of each other.
In five of the games, both the NRA and Trump bought ads. When the NRA ran two spots either attacking Clinton or promoting Trump, the Trump campaign ran just one. And when the Trump campaign ran two spots, the NRA ran one. The pattern even persisted when there was no direct overlap: In the two games the Trump campaign sat out, the NRA ran two ads. And in the one game during which the NRA didn’t buy time, Trump bought two slots. Side by side, the spots aired across the country on as many as 120 stations, according to data provided by Raycom.

Angle’s name appears on Trump campaign paperwork documenting the Raycom purchase, directly above “AMAG.”

After reviewing the Raycom records, Wilson said the pattern suggests the purchases were part of a unified strategy by the NRA and the Trump campaign. “Sometimes you want to maximize the lowest unit rate on the campaign side,” he said. “But you still need more fire on the target. This is why the FEC says coordination is illegal.”

(Mother Jones and the Trace have teamed up to investigate the NRA’s finances and political activity. See more of our reporting here.)
 
Last edited:

Cole Cash

They took a hammer and sickle to my back
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
8,743
Reputation
7,376
Daps
30,717
Reppin
Baltimore Maryland
for the record, we all give a fukk about @fact wife and we all hope she continues to stay strong.

One last thing I would like to say, nap is interestingly enough, I just wanna know, what security clearance have you ever held? I was designated PRP and mine was classified.

Nap have you ever had to have a briefing about potential Russian GRU/former KGB spies posing as “scientists” who come to your base due to cooperation as far as the START treaty mandates? Awww shucks , I have. I even had training on how to interact with them and any of their potential Questions and how they sometimes could squeeze info out of our WSA inadvertently.

The biggest reason I don’t talk much about this is because I signed a law abiding NDA. So while you were at home bumping Air Force one by nelly, I was in Afghanistan. When you were on limewire downloading tunak tunak tun, I learned what it meant to be apart of Air Force space command.

I don’t thrownmy weight around about my service because I’m genuinely here to share info read info and learn from others and a lot of what I know isn’t pertinent to the thread even though it’s somewhat related when it comes to the spy shyt.

Even a contrarian like @Broke Wave can share his views /links with some context and does it without fukking up the whole page.

You talked in the thread about how you basically dikkride Saudi Arabia ? Well I did a TDY at prince sultan for a couple of weeks, fukk them.

If you weren’t such a pretentious a$$hole insulting a man like facts wife whom we all have prayed for and wish the best for a lot of what you do could be forgiven. But like I said , my real life experience is enough have a good exchange with other vets on here who had similar experiences as well as others on here who had been government contractors etc.

Your real life experience is literally what you read online and on twitter. My enjoyment of communal exchange of ideas on here is why I don’t throw out there all the little training and anecdotes I’ve had because I haven’t had a reason to. Everyone on here but you can talk without putting others down,

You’re not a lawyer.
You’re not a veteran.
You’re not a spy.
You’ve never held a clearance.
You’re trained in nothing.
You’re not a journalist.
You have never written a single article
You share no views of your own, just a twitter link and whatever Hillary thinks you just parrot it right back.

You have no kids.
No wife.
Your parents couldn’t even arrange a wife.
You smell like slum dog.
You’re not a millionaire.
You have the worst gifs.
You post the shyttiest music.
You’re lonely.
No woman loves you.
If the internet went out today, I would simply enjoy the days with my woman and my son reflecting on my career as a musican and veteran and currently a case manager for a homeless shelter.

Meanwhile without twitter links and second hand spy stories and Drake CDs , you honestly have nothing Nap.

So in reality I feel sorry for you, like the president we hate so much, you’re loathed unwanted and in the position you’re in by default.


May Allah guide you to Islam.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
305,743
Reputation
-34,224
Daps
616,014
Reppin
The Deep State
Nap have you ever had to have a briefing about potential Russian GRU/former KGB spies posing as “scientists” who come to your base due to cooperation as far as the START treaty mandates? Awww shucks , I have. I even had training on how to interact with them and any of their potential Questions and how they sometimes could squeeze info out of our WSA inadvertently.
Chinese grad students suspected of being MSS?

Sure. :sas1:

I'll go no further :sas2:

You have no kids.
No wife.
Your parents couldn’t even arrange a wife.
You smell like slum dog.
You’re not a millionaire.
You have the worst gifs.
You post the shyttiest music.
You’re lonely.
No woman loves you.
If the internet went out today, I would simply enjoy the days with my woman and my son reflecting on my career as a musican and veteran and currently a case manager for a homeless shelter.
I'm a black male, I don't like Islam too tough, and everything else you're talking about is some personal flaw.

I respect the fact you were in the military but don't drop your ID badge off like I'm supposed to deflect to you.

Fact is, you offer quite literally, nothing to this thread.

You share no information

You don't post insight.

You don't link other people to strands of information

You don't generate interest in back stories or bigger pictures.

You're functionally a leech, in this thread.

I don't respect you on this thread, and if you're the type of person who thinks your Air Force service means anything to me outside of this thread, then I doubt I respect you even beyond that.

You're not even convincing me of what I'm supposed to agree with you on.

You're trolling with this response and you're trolling in this thread.

Once again, you're another entry in the brand of personality who offers nothing of value to this thread.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
305,743
Reputation
-34,224
Daps
616,014
Reppin
The Deep State

Inside the frantic decision to open a Trump obstruction probe before Mueller got the job

Washington (CNN) — In the hectic eight days after President Donald Trump fired FBI Director James Comey, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and top FBI officials viewed Trump as a leader who needed to be reined in, according to two sources describing the sentiment at the time.

They discussed a range of options, including the idea of Rosenstein wearing a wire while speaking with Trump, which Rosenstein later denied. Ultimately, then-acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe took the extraordinary step of opening an obstruction of justice investigation even before special counsel Robert Mueller was appointed, the sources said. The obstruction probe was an idea the FBI had previously considered, but it didn't start until after Comey was fired. The justification went beyond Trump's firing of Comey, according to the sources, and also included the President's conversation with Comey in the Oval Office asking him to drop the investigation into his former national security adviser Michael Flynn.

The new details about the genesis of the obstruction case into Trump that became a key element of the Mueller probe shed light on the chaotic week following Comey's firing and the scramble to decide how best to respond. They also help to explain the origins of the Mueller investigation that has stretched across 19 months, consumed Trump's presidency and is building toward a dramatic day of courtroom filings on Friday.

A Justice Department official strongly disputed Rosenstein sought to curb the President, emphasizing that his conversations with McCabe were simply about talking through ways to conduct the investigation. "He never said anything like that," the source added.

Other sources said that the FBI would only take such dramatic action if officials suspected a crime had been committed. But Rosenstein and other senior FBI officials also had deep concerns about Trump's behavior and thought he needed to be checked, according to the sources.

A spokeswoman for McCabe did not provide comment for this story.

"It's shocking that the FBI would open up an obstruction case for the President exercising his authority under Article II," said the President's attorney Rudy Giuliani.

The Washington Post first reported last yearthat the obstruction investigation started before Mueller's appointment, but the sources offered a more complete picture of the drastic actions law enforcement leaders took during that feverish period.

Prior to Comey's firing, top FBI officials had discussed opening an obstruction investigation based on the President saying to Comey, "I hope you can let this go" when discussing Flynn. That episode was later described in memos Comey wrote following the February meeting that the former FBI director would leak soon after his firing.

Comey's attorney did not comment for this story, but pointed to Comey's 2017 testimony to the Senate Intelligence Committee.

Comey, however, hinted at the discussion in his book.

"We resolved to figure out down the road what to do with the president's request and its implications as our investigation progressed," he wrote.

Then, on May 9, Comey was fired.

The subsequent meetings led by Rosenstein and McCabe were held soon after the White House made clear that Rosenstein's memo addressing concerns about Comey's conduct during the Hillary Clinton probe was central to the President's decision. One of the sources likened it to "spitballing" about potential steps in the mold of "What are the options. What makes sense. What doesn't?"

For the deputy attorney general, the obstruction investigation into Trump and the appointment of the special counsel has turned his entire Justice Department tenure into an awkward role of supervising the Mueller investigation after he -- voluntarily, sources said -- wrote the memo justifying Comey's firing. Critics have argued the Comey memo makes Rosenstein a potential witness in the obstruction case.


Trump's ire for obstruction inquiry


One source said there were "different conversations at different times with different people." The President then raised the stakes, telling NBC News in an interview that he fired Comey because of the "Russia thing."

Among the ideas discussed were opening an obstruction probe and appointing a special counsel, which were ultimately done in quick succession, less than two weeks after Comey was fired. Rosenstein also raised the idea of wearing a wire while speaking with Trump and exploring whether Cabinet members would invoke the 25th Amendment to remove Trump from office. Those additional ideas, first reported by The New York Times, were taken seriously by some officials but did not come to pass, and one source in the room has dismissed Rosenstein's comments on the wire as sarcasm.


Rosenstein's original public announcement appointing the special counsel did not specifically reference the obstruction issue, only "the previously-confirmed FBI investigation of Russian government efforts to influence the 2016 presidential election and related matters." But the order setting up the special counsel did include the legal code that includes investigating matters related to obstruction.

Rosenstein has been under constant fire from Trump and a frequent target of the President's tweets, and he was prepared to be fired after his comments about wearing a wire and the 25th Amendment were reported. He survived at the Justice Department but was passed over as acting attorney general for Jeff Sessions' chief of staff Matt Whitaker, who was seen as a loyalist to Trump and has publicly criticized the special counsel's investigation.

Both McCabe and Rosenstein have felt the withering criticism of the President. Just last week, Trump tweeted out a picture of Rosenstein in prison. Asked why he did that in an interview with The New York Post, Trump responded, "He never should have picked a special counsel."

This week, Rosenstein joked during a speech to "let the President know that his favorite deputy attorney general was here."

Trump has submitted written answers to Mueller's team about potential collusion between members of Trump's team and Russian officials, but he has not answered questions from the special counsel related to obstruction. It's still not clear whether Mueller will try to seek additional written testimony or an in-person interview from Trump related to the obstruction investigation. The President's lawyers have signaled they won't answer questions on obstruction because the time period falls under executive privilege.



The push for a special counsel


In the days immediately after Comey was fired, McCabe pushed for the appointment of a special counsel but Rosenstein seemed hesitant, despite many calls to do so.

On May 11, two days after Comey was fired, Rosenstein briefed Republican Senate Intelligence Chairman Richard Burr of North Carolina and the panel's top Democrat, Virginia Sen. Mark Warner, who were running their own Russia investigation. According to contemporaneous text messages between FBI officials, "Warner conveyed that he wanted (a) special counsel" and Rosenstein "said he took that under advisement."

McCabe and Rosenstein later met with the full "Gang of Eight," the Republican and Democratic congressional leaders and intelligence committee heads, the day Mueller was appointed.

Separately, Comey was orchestrating his own campaign to create public outcry for a special counsel. The former FBI director had a key memo about his interactions with Trump leaked to The New York Times, which published an article that Trump had asked Comey to go easy on Flynn on May 16. Mueller was appointed the next day.

It is not clear why the FBI first moved to open a case just before the appointment of a special counsel.
However, the investigation of the President could have been seen as an impetus for having an independent team investigate given the sensitivities. At the time, those pushing for special counsel were focused on protecting the Russia investigation from further efforts by Trump to curtail it.

CNN's Laura Jarrett, Evan Perez and Josh Campbell contributed to this report.
 
Last edited:

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
305,743
Reputation
-34,224
Daps
616,014
Reppin
The Deep State
It begins...


Nah, Tucker is a damn near actual nazi.

He's a nationalist socialist by many accords if you left him talk.

He's really in favor of unions and welfare and removing corruption...only if it benefits white people

Listen to what he's saying. He's not like a lot of other guys like Hannity.

Theres levels to their shyt.
 
Top