RUSSIA/РОССИЯ THREAD—ASSANGE CHRGD W/ SPYING—DJT IMPEACHED TWICE-US TREASURY SANCTS KILIMNIK AS RUSSIAN AGNT

☑

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Hall of Shame
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
305,925
Reputation
-34,254
Daps
616,199
Reppin
The Deep State
DtXOW8DW0AAxgvK.jpg
 
88m3

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
87,499
Reputation
3,571
Daps
155,432
Reppin
Brooklyn
jj23

jj23

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Nov 26, 2016
Messages
24,505
Reputation
5,759
Daps
112,613
Json said:
You new to politics?

This isn’t about so and so.

Pelosi specifically has been turned into a derogatory term for liberal ideas by Republicans.

Republicans want to move pass Trump so having another boogeyman like the Clintons would allow to to move the conversation pass Trump if Pence is dirty.
Click to expand...

The republicans can create a bogeyman with whoever is there.
With any reasonable leaders turnout is usually high, it just shows how much trump depresses everything outside the base.
If Pelosi is the most effective leader, let her do her thing. The question to ask should be, will she do enough to keep the democratic base and undecideds interested?
 
mastermind

mastermind

Rest In Power Kobe
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
61,983
Reputation
5,887
Daps
163,236
jj23 said:
The republicans can create a bogeyman with whoever is there.
With any reasonable leaders turnout is usually high, it just shows how much trump depresses everything outside the base.
If Pelosi is the most effective leader, let her do her thing. The question to ask should be, will she do enough to keep the democratic base and undecideds interested?
Click to expand...
Pelosi would not run for re-election if she moves into the White House.
 
BigMoneyGrip

BigMoneyGrip

I'm Lamont's pops
Supporter
Joined
Nov 20, 2016
Messages
79,648
Reputation
10,935
Daps
314,878
Reppin
Straight from Flatbush
Json said:
But she wouldn't get to replace federal judges and stuff that's the actually key for a Pelosi presidency. Even with the majority on the Supreme Court, bytch McConnell would still make Ginsburg stay on so he'd have a super majority to replace her.

The Republicans got their tax cuts, they don't care if the regulations go back to Obama era.



Having a Pence be their in 2019 would be a constant reminder of Trump's crimes.

You give Republican voters too much credit. They've shown with the Trump presidency how much they are willing to overlook. Doug Jones didn't win in a landslide against a pedo. Dems lost Senate seats in Republican heavy states. NRA and all the shootings.

With Pelosi as a figurehead, it at least gives Republicans a face to rile up its base that isn't Obama. Plus, she's a woman from California. That's the go to for Republicans voters to get out and vote.
Click to expand...


To answer your first question true Nancy can’t replace federal judges however and that is a big however if Trump is convicted of Treason(once out of office) through resignation or impeached on obstruction first and then charged with RICO and treason and convicted then yeah all of his appointments will be null and void because those appointments was approved via fraud.. if that’s the case I don’t know whether those new appointments would bypass senate approval

Your second question, I’m not giving gop voters any credit and your wrong Dems retained a Dem senate seat in Montana that’s gop heavy

Gop lost the damn near every congressional seat in Cali breh.. Orange country was a gop strong hold and they lost that shyt in a sweep.. GOP only gained 2 seats in republican states but they were only defending 2 seats.. in 2020 they gotta defend about 20 seats in which they are gonna lose a lot especially how the midterms turned out for them
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top