RUSSIA/РОССИЯ THREAD—ASSANGE CHRGD W/ SPYING—DJT IMPEACHED TWICE-US TREASURY SANCTS KILIMNIK AS RUSSIAN AGNT

GnauzBookOfRhymes

Superstar
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
12,451
Reputation
2,832
Daps
47,781
Reppin
NULL
very provocative article.

other potential possibilities.

1. the target is someone who worked with the judge who recused himself (either at jones day, or maybe he hired him [or vice versa] at some point in the past

2. maybe the judge is just very careful and not as committed of an ideologue as trump and co., hoped. for instance there are a lot of people who work with the administration not because they like trump personally - they might hate his guts. but they see him as someone that will implement their policies w/o challenge

3. DON MCGAHN is my guess - he worked at jones day
 

Hood Critic

The Power Circle
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
23,591
Reputation
3,580
Daps
107,150
Reppin
דעת
very provocative article.

other potential possibilities.

1. the target is someone who worked with the judge who recused himself (either at jones day, or maybe he hired him [or vice versa] at some point in the past

2. maybe the judge is just very careful and not as committed of an ideologue as trump and co., hoped. for instance there are a lot of people who work with the administration not because they like trump personally - they might hate his guts. but they see him as someone that will implement their policies w/o challenge

3. DON MCGAHN is my guess - he worked at jones day
McGahn is a good guess but considering all of the hours he voluntarily spent with the SC's office, why would he put up this type of a fight over a grand jury subpoena?
 

Blackfyre

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Oct 30, 2017
Messages
17,051
Reputation
3,073
Daps
67,061
Reppin
Earthrealm

GnauzBookOfRhymes

Superstar
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
12,451
Reputation
2,832
Daps
47,781
Reppin
NULL
McGahn is a good guess but considering all of the hours he voluntarily spent with the SC's office, why would he put up this type of a fight over a grand jury subpoena?

because a subpoena might involve him having to testify as to things that he may consider to be covered by attorney client privilege. his discussions with SC were voluntary - im sure there were questions he refused to answer because he was unsure as to whether atty/client privilege applied. and because it was voluntary, the SC would be more than happy to go onto the next question knowing that they would be revisiting those issues at a later date.
 
Top