so glad my vids that are on topic and get posted on threads get reported as SPAM but y'all love posting the white late night show host..
PATHETIC
join the real world..its how things workwe, including you, were discussing how it should be, but now that you've been shown wrong, you want to discuss how it is...such savagery
My friend is an investigator for a contractor that does background checks for people waiting on security clearances. He had to get investigated for that job, and they must've interviewed about 15 of his friends including me. Someone said that he had an Israeli cousin (he doesn't) and they had to reinterview several people to confirm that he didn't. They really don't fool around with the whole "do you have any contacts with foreign Nationals" partIt's pretty accurate. I worked as a contractor for the DoD at a naval shipyard in Portsmouth, NH needing to obtain SECRET and then TS clearances. The SF86 is no joke. Lying on it is almost certainly a crime and omitting relevant information is grounds for an immediate DQ and loss of any existing clearances. They are most interested in honesty and trustworthiness than they are with how you answered. For example, I marked yes that I smoked weed within the last 7 years , and while that stirred up further investigation to make sure I couldn't be blackmailed or exploited over it, it didn't prevent me from getting my clearances.
And that was just for some weed. I'd imagine if I started making contracts in Russia, they would be turning over more rocks than even I knew I had.
Be interesting to see if anything comes of this. Regular citizens would be tossed in the bushes for lying/leaving this info out.
4d 6f 6e 65 79 negged you for your post in the thread IMPEACH 45—SESSIONS/MANAFORT LIES—FLYNN SNITCHES—RUS BACKCHANNELS—PAGE MET SPIES—NUNES RECUSE/ETHICS. With the following comment: lolso glad my vids that are on topic and get posted on threads get reported as SPAM but y'all love posting the white late night show host..
PATHETIC
dude lied on his SF86...if you did that, you'd be in FBI custody.
we, including you, were discussing how it should be, but now that you've been shown wrong, you want to discuss how it is...such savagery