RUSSIA/РОССИЯ THREAD—ASSANGE CHRGD W/ SPYING—DJT IMPEACHED TWICE-US TREASURY SANCTS KILIMNIK AS RUSSIAN AGNT

re'up

Veteran
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
20,349
Reputation
6,146
Daps
63,889
Reppin
San Diego
Flynn could serve no time, if he cooperates to a degree that leads prosectors to ask the judge for no custody, and the judge agrees. Or the prosectors ask for 1 year and Flynn's attorney says zero custody time, and the judge meets in the middle.

The max for lying to the FBI is 5 years per count, I believe Flynn was charged, and pleaded guilty to one count.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
308,246
Reputation
-34,317
Daps
618,616
Reppin
The Deep State
The Dutch guy was given 30 days. How much time will Flynn get? Will it be years, decades, a millennium?
Flynn was facing manafort years.

He had a possible kidnapping charge, he was low key accused of espionage with his actions with a possible Russian spy in the U.K. acting as a honey pot, his connections to the Russians, his FARA violations with Turkey and the UAE...whatever he is getting is far too light.
 

Jhoon

Spontaneous Mishaps and Hijinks
Joined
Jul 2, 2012
Messages
16,518
Reputation
1,505
Daps
37,704
Flynn was facing manafort years.

He had a possible kidnapping charge, he was low key accused of espionage with his actions with a possible Russian spy in the U.K. acting as a honey pot, his connections to the Russians, his FARA violations with Turkey and the UAE...whatever he is getting is far too light.
So about 36 days?
 

Hood Critic

The Power Circle
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
23,970
Reputation
3,687
Daps
109,379
Reppin
דעת
I don’t have all the facts. I think these guys are traitors. I have seen the fbi apply heavy handed tactics on minorities, only to watch certain folks get 30 days.
This comparison makes no sense since minorities who cooperate get light sentences as well. So those lack of 30 day sentences have a lot to do with how we treat snitching and snitches. The white man can be blamed for a lot of things but we got to start looking at self when we make comments such as yours.
 

Dr. Acula

Hail Hydra
Supporter
Joined
Jul 26, 2012
Messages
25,810
Reputation
8,616
Daps
136,940
There was a guy on Morning Joe talking about how the Dems could fix the Supreme Court issue whenever they get control of the all 3 branches. They could add more Justices to the court. From what was reported the number of Justices have changed quite a few times over the course of our history so there is precedent for doing so. That is something that could be fixed after 2020 depending on how the new few elections go. I dont know if the Dems would do it.
Chuck Schumer and Pelosi just chastised Maxine Waters for sayijng you should confront Trump Admin officials when possible. This is relatively benign.

Heidkept and Blumenthal before making an about face after backlash not only not talk about delaying a supreme Court pick but even suggested two wrongs don't make a right and said they wish to begin voting on the matter in a timely fashion.

The current Democratic leadership is bytch. They will never EVER break so far from the status quo to the point of adding more seats for a political advantage. Republicans would!

You can't have faith in the status quo types to be fighters and revolutionary. A lot of them don't have any need or incentive to be revolutionary since folks like Schumer and Pelosi feel they will retain their seat in good and in bad times given who they represent. Why engage in costly battles? How does it benefit their standing one way or another?
 

dtownreppin214

l'immortale
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
55,762
Reputation
10,536
Daps
192,069
Reppin
Shags & Leathers
Chuck Schumer and Pelosi just chastised Maxine Waters for sayijng you should confront Trump Admin officials when possible. This is relatively benign.

Heidkept and Blumenthal before making an about face after backlash not only not talk about delaying a supreme Court pick but even suggested two wrongs don't make a right and said they wish to begin voting on the matter in a timely fashion.

The current Democratic leadership is bytch. They will never EVER break so far from the status quo to the point of adding more seats for a political advantage. Republicans would!

You can't have faith in the status quo types to be fighters and revolutionary. A lot of them don't have any need or incentive to be revolutionary since folks like Schumer and Pelosi feel they will retain their seat in good and in bad times given who they represent. Why engage in costly battles? How does it benefit their standing one way or another?
:francis:

 
Top