RUSSIA/РОССИЯ THREAD—ASSANGE CHRGD W/ SPYING—DJT IMPEACHED TWICE-US TREASURY SANCTS KILIMNIK AS RUSSIAN AGNT

tru_m.a.c

IC veteran
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
31,248
Reputation
6,810
Daps
90,688
Reppin
Gaithersburg, MD via Queens/LI
Next level stuff. I am thinking (hoping) that because thousands of Law Enforcement Officials have access to the files, it was the Special Counsel that hid the two SARs from public view, because it is something groundbreaking in there that could affect their case if made public.

Outside of that, Mueller could get a subpoena to have the SARs anytime I'd guess so someone on Trump's books removing the records permanently without any forensic trace seems implausible and/or a quick way to get some jail time until you're ready to talk.
From reading the articles related to the whistleblower SARS are not allowed to be moved or hidden. There is no policy or tool available to do so. They are permanent records.
 

jj23

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Nov 26, 2016
Messages
24,754
Reputation
5,825
Daps
113,872



The Hill
15 mins ·
President Trump's attorney Rudy Giuliani argued that there was no collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia because the campaign never used the information during the 2016 election: "They rejected it. If there was collusion with the Russians, they would have used it."


Giuliani: If there was collusion with the Russians, the Trump campaign ‘would have used it’
"When I ran against them they were looking for dirt on me every day...Even if it comes from a Russian, a German, an American, doesn't matter," Giuliani…
THEHILL.COM




???????


The fukk? :dwillhuh:

Whose man is Giuliani? That statement is dumber than anything Dotard has ever uttered.

We sure he’s not senile?

You admit basically to collusion, and by extension treason, but say IT ISN’T treason because you didn’t use the stuff at the meeting??!!!

Then why didn’t you REPORT IT like a good citizen?
 

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
88,182
Reputation
3,616
Daps
157,204
Reppin
Brooklyn

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
88,182
Reputation
3,616
Daps
157,204
Reppin
Brooklyn
The fukk? :dwillhuh:

Whose man is Giuliani? That statement is dumber than anything Dotard has ever uttered.

We sure he’s not senile?u

You admit basically to collusion, and by extension treason, but say IT ISN’T treason because you didn’t use the stuff at the meeting??!!!

Then why didn’t you REPORT IT like a good citizen?
If that was Rudy’s plan, he is a stone cold moron.


Yeah, they seem to want the public to follow them down their retarded rabbit hole. It's not going to work. This is some alternative facts/1984 doublespeak levels of nonsense.
 

Jhoon

Spontaneous Mishaps and Hijinks
Joined
Jul 2, 2012
Messages
16,518
Reputation
1,505
Daps
37,703
Yeah, they seem to want the public to follow them down their retarded rabbit hole. It's not going to work. This is some alternative facts/1984 doublespeak levels of nonsense.
Coupled with the animal comment it’s obvious they’re real corny.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
307,449
Reputation
-34,327
Daps
617,997
Reppin
The Deep State
this is completely wrong

the anti-iraq vote still matters because to Democratic voters the reason the vote was made is a party defining measure. Democrats believe the Iraq vote was a political requirement done in haste and that everything that happened as a result was an unfortunate and unintended consequence. In other words, Democrats are fine with "we had to, we didn't now, I'm sorry."

Republican voters would not only revote for Iraq again they actually believe war is the answer for geopolitical issues (see: posturing with North Korea, indifference toward Yemen, aggression with Iran, support of Israel, arming the Kurds)

This confirmation IS important because any Democrat that receives the party nomination WILL HAVE TO worry about Democratic voters staying at home because fukk boys like Manchin like to gargle Trump's nuts.

Hillary paid for the sins of Democratic Senators past and present and those muhfukkas know it.
You gotta remember that in the 1991 Gulf War a lot of Democrats didn't vote for it...and it was a successful war.

Then when the Iraq War in 2003 popped off, a lot of Democrats wanted in on that Post-War glory...and that didn't turn out so well :francis:
 

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
88,182
Reputation
3,616
Daps
157,204
Reppin
Brooklyn
You gotta remember that in the 1991 Gulf War a lot of Democrats didn't vote for it...and it was a successful war.

Then when the Iraq War in 2003 popped off, a lot of Democrats wanted in on that Post-War glory...and that didn't turn out so well :francis:

They tried to kill his dad.
 
Top