RUSSIA/РОССИЯ THREAD—ASSANGE CHRGD W/ SPYING—DJT IMPEACHED TWICE-US TREASURY SANCTS KILIMNIK AS RUSSIAN AGNT
- Thread starter ☑︎#VoteDemocrat
- Start date
Stone Cold
Superstar
so Julian should try leaving that embassy
BY KATIE BO WILLIAMS - 01/10/17 01:45 PM EST 154
1,202
© Getty
The FBI requested direct access to the Democratic National Committee’s (DNC) hacked computer servers but was denied, Director James Comey told lawmakers on Tuesday.
The bureau made “multiple requests at different levels,” according to Comey, but ultimately struck an agreement with the DNC that a “highly respected private company” would get access and share what it found with investigators.
“We’d always prefer to have access hands-on ourselves if that’s possible,” Comey said, noting that he didn’t know why the DNC rebuffed the FBI’s request.
The director was testifying before the Senate Intelligence Committee in a rare open session on Russian interference in the U.S. presidential election.
The DNC and the bureau have been quibbling in news reports over whether the FBI asked to examine its servers directly.
The DNC told BuzzFeed in a statement published last week that the FBI never requested access to its servers after they were breached.
But a senior law enforcement official disputed that characterization the following day.
“The FBI repeatedly stressed to DNC officials the necessity of obtaining direct access to servers and data, only to be rebuffed until well after the initial compromise had been mitigated,” the official said.
“This left the FBI no choice but to rely upon a third party for information. These actions caused significant delays and inhibited the FBI from addressing the intrusion earlier.”
CrowdStrike, the private security firm in question, has published extensive forensic analysis backing up its assessment that the threat groups that infiltrated the DNC were associated with Russian intelligence.
no wonder we're going no where fast with all this "investigating"
Damn dummyAdam Schiff: There Is No "Definitive" Proof Of Any Trump-Russia Connection
Tim Hains
On Date April 2, 2017
Adam Schiff: There Is No "Definitive" Proof Of Any Trump-Russia Connection
CLICK LINK FOR VIDEO
Adam Schiff: There Is No "Definitive" Proof Of Any Trump-Russia Connection
On Sunday's edition of 'State of the Union' on CNN, House Intelligence Committee top Democrat Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) explained that so far his investigation has turned up no evidence of Trump-Russia collusion in the 2016 election.
"I don’t think we can say anything definitively at this point," Schiff said. "We are still at the very early stages of the investigation. The only thing I can say is that it would be irresponsible for us not to get to the bottom of this. We really need to find out exactly what the Russians did. Because one of the most important conclusions that the intelligence community reached is that they are going to do this again to the United States. They are doing it already in Europe. So we can say conclusively this is something that needs to be thoroughly investigated but it’s way premature to be reaching conclusions."
Over 500 pages in this thread with plenty of evidence to warrant an investigation, and #TrumpSet members keep coming in at random moments on some "WHERE'S THE BEEF??? 
" nonsense.
Nikkas confuse "evidence" with "proof". There is no "proof" yet, because the investigation is still ongoing. If there was proof to be revealed yet, Cheeto would already be wearing a skintone-colored jumpsuit. :cottonmouthlaugh:
There is, however, more than enough evidence to warrant an investigation, evidence that continues to pile up day by day. If there wasn't evidence, there would be no investigation.
Just like there's no "investigation" into Hillary "selling uranium to the Russians" because there's no evidence that she did anything criminal. Unless you'd want to implicate nine other governmental agencies who signed off on the sale of non-weapons grade uranium that Hill just happened to be a part of. :tinfoilbrown:
tl;dr Putting these Trump groupies on ignore for not knowing the difference between proof and evidence
" nonsense. Nikkas confuse "evidence" with "proof". There is no "proof" yet, because the investigation is still ongoing. If there was proof to be revealed yet, Cheeto would already be wearing a skintone-colored jumpsuit. :cottonmouthlaugh:
There is, however, more than enough evidence to warrant an investigation, evidence that continues to pile up day by day. If there wasn't evidence, there would be no investigation.
Just like there's no "investigation" into Hillary "selling uranium to the Russians" because there's no evidence that she did anything criminal. Unless you'd want to implicate nine other governmental agencies who signed off on the sale of non-weapons grade uranium that Hill just happened to be a part of. :tinfoilbrown:
tl;dr Putting these Trump groupies on ignore for not knowing the difference between proof and evidence
@DonKnock @Hood Critic @LHilla @ReignAsKing @True Blue Moon @poRATCHETteacha @Sammy Steez @SJUGrad13 @88m3 @lotuseater80 @Cali_livin @Cobratron @Menelik II @RJY33 @greenygreen @jerniebert @Wepa Man @PlayerNinety_Nine @AZBeauty @Hogan in the Wolfpac @iceberg_is_on_fire @Airfeezy @wire28 @Atlrocafella @Ss4gogeta0 @smitty22 @Ms. Elaine @Reality @fact @Hood Critic @ExodusNirvana @re'up @Call Me James @Blessed Is the Man @BaggerofTea @GnauzBookOfRhymes @THE MACHINE
Perfect response to people wanting a faster investigation:Over 500 pages in this thread with plenty of evidence to warrant an investigation, and #TrumpSet members keep coming in at random moments on some "WHERE'S THE BEEF???
Nikkas confuse "evidence" with "proof". There is no "proof" yet, because the investigation is still ongoing. If there was proof to be revealed yet, Cheeto would already be wearing a skintone-colored jumpsuit. :cottonmouthlaugh:
There is, however, more than enough evidence to warrant an investigation, evidence that continues to pile up day by day. If there wasn't evidence, there would be no investigation.
Just like there's no "investigation" into Hillary "selling uranium to the Russians" because there's no evidence that she did anything criminal. Unless you'd want to implicate nine other governmental agencies who signed off on the sale of non-weapons grade uranium that Hill just happened to be a part of. :tinfoilbrown:
tl;dr Putting these Trump groupies on ignore for not knowing the difference between proof and evidence
both sides expecting people to go to jail....my money is on the DON
Hood Critic
The Power Circle
so Julian should try leaving that embassy
He might be coming out to play a lot sooner rather than later
The house Is on fire and nikkas still complaining about the smoke alarm
:cambybp:There is nothing here but cherry picked intel. Even if Rice is responsible, she's a true patriot IMO. :kanyebp:
Stone Cold
Superstar
Over 500 pages in this thread with plenty of evidence to warrant an investigation, and #TrumpSet members keep coming in at random moments on some "WHERE'S THE BEEF???
Nikkas confuse "evidence" with "proof". There is no "proof" yet, because the investigation is still ongoing. If there was proof to be revealed yet, Cheeto would already be wearing a skintone-colored jumpsuit. :cottonmouthlaugh:
There is, however, more than enough evidence to warrant an investigation, evidence that continues to pile up day by day. If there wasn't evidence, there would be no investigation.
Just like there's no "investigation" into Hillary "selling uranium to the Russians" because there's no evidence that she did anything criminal. Unless you'd want to implicate nine other governmental agencies who signed off on the sale of non-weapons grade uranium that Hill just happened to be a part of. :tinfoilbrown:
tl;dr Putting these Trump groupies on ignore for not knowing the difference between proof and evidence
I thought it was only Batman who beat up strawmen.
I didnt know Black Panther did too
Stone Cold
Superstar
Last edited: