lol, that show has the President pushing the Sec of State down a flight of stairs in the white house....and its STILL not even close to the fukkery of Trump & co
I remember thinking how unrealistic that was back then shyt has definitely changed.
lol, that show has the President pushing the Sec of State down a flight of stairs in the white house....and its STILL not even close to the fukkery of Trump & co
Kids gonna read this stuff in history school books in 2085 and be that we really let this nonsense go on.
Kids gonna have this stuff automatically and involuntarily downloaded into their e-brains in 2085 and be that we really lived so long without a connection to the Great Overmind
Chuck Todd may be more useless than Wolf Blitzer.Chuck Todd: The mood in Washington feels like something big is about to happen.
I read/heard that Hannity claims to have "broken more stories" than his Fox News peers...so...we're about to see what his "journalistic chops" are sooner or later.Not to defend Hannity’s bytch ass, but this is a bad argument because Hannity is NOT a journalist and has never pretended to be impartial. He’s an opinionated commentator or entertainer.
Sean Hannity and the benefits of low expectations
by Callum Borchers
Hannity mentioned Cohen a lot on Fox. He forgot to mention he was his lawyer.
A tidy synopsis of the Sean Hannity conundrum can be found in a single tweet by the chair of the ethics committee at the Society of Professional Journalists, Andrew M. Seaman.
As Hannity tries to weather the latest round of criticism from his media colleagues — and the Fox News star probably will weather it — he benefits from the phenomenally low expectations he has established for himself.
This is, after all, the TV host who appeared in a Donald Trump campaign ad, flew Newt Gingrich on a private jet to interview for the role of Trump's running mate and continues to serve as an informal adviser to the president. Monday's revelation that Hannity has been crying foul about Trump, Cohen and attorney-client privilege without telling viewers that he, too, is a Cohen client seems consistent with behavior that Fox News and its viewers are willing to tolerate.
Fox News did not comment on Hannity's lack of disclosure for a full day. A network spokeswoman initially referred The Fix to the explanation Hannity offered on his show Monday night: “My discussions with Michael Cohen never rose to any level that I needed to tell anyone that I was asking him questions.”
“The fact that Fox News has said nothing about this is outrageous,” said Kyle Pope, editor and publisher of the Columbia Journalism Review. “They have among the most aggressive PR shops in television. If you write something, they are there in minutes. They are calling you and saying, 'You've got to change this.' They are omnipresent, and they are aggressive. And all of a sudden, now, they are like crickets.”
On Tuesday afternoon, the network finally issued a statement: “While Fox News was unaware of Sean Hannity's informal relationship with Michael Cohen and was surprised by the announcement in court yesterday, we have reviewed the matter and spoken to Sean, and he continues to have our full support.”
[The gaping hole in Sean Hannity’s story about being Michael Cohen’s client]
In the past, Hannity and Fox News have attempted to insulate him from ethical questions by calling him a talk-show host.
“I never claimed to be a journalist,” Hannity told the New York Times in 2016.
In another interview with the Times last year, however, Hannity said: “I'm a journalist. But I'm an advocacy journalist, or an opinion journalist.”
I wrote at the time of Hannity's latter remarks that if he calls himself a journalist, he ought to be judged as such. But Seaman told me Tuesday that “we can't apply traditional journalistic standards to Sean Hannity. He may call himself some type of journalist, but I think a reasonable viewer knows he's not an impartial observer.”
Still, Seaman said, “It's just common communication decency to let people know when you have proverbial skin in the game. I don't think anyone likes to find out at a later date that the person who first told them a bit of news was actually involved with the event.”
Aly Colón, a former director of standards and practices at NBC News, added this: “Sean Hannity's role as a television show host may not require the ethical standards of a journalist. But it does behoove him to abide by ethical standards of openness and accuracy. His credibility depends on it.”
The 3.2 million viewers who tune in to Hannity's prime-time show every night might measure credibility differently, however. Part of Hannity's appeal is his access to the president and other key players on Trump's team.
“Some people may see this as no problem whatsoever,” said Kathleen Bartzen Culver, director of the Center for Journalism Ethics at the University of Wisconsin at Madison.
On the air last week, Hannity decried FBI raids on Cohen's office, home and hotel room but neglected to mention that his own communications with Cohen were among the documents seized by federal agents.
Culver said that “as he was making claims that this was some sort of government overreach that jeopardized attorney-client privilege, it could have been persuasive for him to say: 'And I am one of those clients. I have had confidential conversations with Michael Cohen, and that is exactly why I am an expert.' Members of his audience might have thought: 'He's exactly right. He has a unique perspective.' ”
The problem, according to Culver, is that Hannity denied his viewers the right to make such a judgment for themselves. He made the call for them.
“That's not a decision Sean Hannity gets to make,” Culver said. “That decision rests with the audience.”
Panel agreed.Chuck Todd may be more useless than Wolf Blitzer.
Depends:
At a base level its media manipulation and propaganda in the fact he defended Cohen and Trump without disclosing they had some form of an attorney/client relationship.
At worse Daniel's lawyer may attempt to sue Fox for allowing Hannity to paint a narrative against her in concert with Cohen while no disclosing the relationship.
At a nuclear level, if there is any connection between Cohen, Russia, collusion, etc. Shyt could get really real.
He railed against the DOJ for raiding Cohen last week and did not declare his relationship to Cohen.
It is not ethically the right thing to do, not just as a journalist but as a person. But as a journalist, it is the one of the worst things you can do because you are supposed to be straight down the middle in your reporting.
Hannity's relationship with Cohen shows that he cannot be impartial.
It’s not a legal issue, it’s ethics, integrity, and journalistic standards.
Thanks guys....but I was looking for something other than "...he's a piece of sh*t...". We know he's a POS, but legally, how does this matter? That's what I'm struggling with.