RUSSIA/РОССИЯ THREAD—ASSANGE CHRGD W/ SPYING—DJT IMPEACHED TWICE-US TREASURY SANCTS KILIMNIK AS RUSSIAN AGNT

CurrencyChase

Banned
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
6,991
Reputation
-590
Daps
12,315
Reppin
Ohio, Iowa, & Minnesota

Regular_P

Just end the season.
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
78,627
Reputation
9,800
Daps
211,753
The Department of Justice Thinks That Collusion Is a Crime

The Department of Justice Thinks That Collusion Is a Crime

Is collusion a crime? That is one of the central questions of the investigation into Russian efforts to interfere in the 2016 U.S. elections. Even if it could be proved that Donald Trump and his supporters worked with the Russian government, or with Russian citizens, to win the Presidential race, would that activity have violated United States law? It’s long been an article of faith for Trump supporters, and for Trump himself, that collusion is not illegal. As the President told the Times in an interview last December, “There is no collusion, and even if there was, it’s not a crime.”

Now, it appears, Trump’s own Justice Department may have a different view. That conclusion appears in a document released earlier this week, in the course of pre-trial litigation in the case of Paul Manafort, Trump’s former campaign chairman, on charges including money laundering. Lawyers for Manafort, who has pleaded not guilty to the charges, asked that they be dismissed on the grounds that Robert Mueller, the special counsel, did not have the right to bring them; Manafort’s lawyers assert that the case—which centers on work that Manafort did for the pro-Russian government of Ukraine—was outside Mueller’s jurisdiction.

In response to this claim, Mueller filed a brief that laid out the basis for him to bring the case. As described in the brief, after Mueller was appointed, in May of last year, he asked Rod Rosenstein, the Deputy Attorney General and Mueller’s supervisor, for specific authorization for the areas that he wanted to investigate. In a memorandum issued on August 2nd, Rosenstein spelled out the details of Mueller’s jurisdiction. He said that Mueller had the authority to investigate:

Allegations that Paul Manafort:

Committed a crime or crimes by colluding with Russian government officials with respect to the Russian government’s efforts to interfere with the 2016 election for President of the United States, in violation of United States law;


Committed a crime or crimes arising out of payments he received from the Ukrainian government before and during the tenure of President Viktor Yanukovych.

The second point shows Mueller’s authority to bring the case that he did against Manafort, but the real news is in the first point. That statement could not be clearer that Mueller can examine whether a member of the Trump campaign and the Russians were “colluding,” and thus working together “in violation of United States law.” In other words, according to Rosenstein, collusion would be a crime.

Much of the rest of Rosenstein’s memorandum is redacted. Mueller clearly has the authority to investigate other individuals, but their identities, as well as their possible crimes, are not revealed. Mueller, however, in another part of his brief, makes clear that he has the authority to investigate obstruction of justice—including obstruction of his own investigation. This, too, is a crucial disclosure. But, if collusion is a crime, what crime is it? What criminal statutes forbid collusion? In an article for The New Yorker in December, I explored this subject, and raised several possibilities, including conspiracy to solicit illegal campaign contributions and conspiracy to engage in illegal computer hacking. But Mueller’s subsequent actions give a hint of his own interpretation of the subject. In February, he obtained an indictment of thirteen Russian citizens and three Russian entities for using social media to help Trump win the election. The key charge in the case, which is called conspiracy to defraud the United States, is spelled out this way in the indictment:

Defendants, together with others known and unknown to the Grand Jury, knowingly and intentionally conspired to defraud the United States by impairing, obstructing, and defeating the lawful functions of the Federal Election Commission, the U.S. Department of Justice, and the U.S. Department of State in administering federal requirements for disclosure of foreign involvement in certain domestic activities.

This case, of course, only deals with Russian defendants. But if Mueller were able to prove that Americans worked with the Russians in this kind of endeavor—that is, if he can prove that Americans colluded with the Russians—then he could bring a similar charge against them.
On Tuesday night, the Washington Post reported that the President himself remains a subject of the special counsel’s investigation, meaning that his conduct is being scrutinized, but that no decision has been made about whether charges will be brought against him.

Nevertheless, Mueller now has the authority, and the legal theory, to bring criminal charges for collusion. The unanswered question is whether he has American defendants, too.
 

Blackfyre

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Oct 30, 2017
Messages
17,179
Reputation
3,074
Daps
67,386
Reppin
Earthrealm

Dr. Acula

Hail Hydra
Supporter
Joined
Jul 26, 2012
Messages
25,777
Reputation
8,591
Daps
136,783
Let me know when you recommend invading Saudi Arabia, Israel and overthrowing their governments based on how it treats it citizens or apartheid subjects and get back to me.

Im guessing you're a neocon looking to go nation build and spread "democracy" around the globe? What makes you different than George bush and pals and differentiates it from what we did in Iraq?

At least Nap is honest, even if in my opinion misguided on his supposed benefit, these not being humanitarian actions. Until you're consistent and the US is consistent in caring about these things I'm not going to buy into the bullshyt.
 
Last edited:

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
88,138
Reputation
3,616
Daps
157,146
Reppin
Brooklyn
Let me know when you recommend invading Saudi Arabia, Israel and overthrowing their governments based on how it treats it citizens or apartheid subjects and get back to me.

Im guessing you're a neocon looking to go nation build and spread "democracy" around the globe? What makes you different than George bush and pals and differentiates it from what we did in Iraq?

You're fine with Assad using chemical weapons on children and I suppose ISIS running amok across the Middle East and committing terrorist attacks in the West.

Your idealism is really selfishness and moral grandstanding.

It's not necessary to refute your deflections.

:yeshrug:
 

Dr. Acula

Hail Hydra
Supporter
Joined
Jul 26, 2012
Messages
25,777
Reputation
8,591
Daps
136,783
You're fine with Assad using chemical weapons on children and I suppose ISIS running amok across the Middle East and committing terrorist attacks in the West.

Your idealism is really selfishness and moral grandstanding.

It's not necessary to refute your deflections.

:yeshrug:
Saddam also used chemical weapons after the first gulf war and we left him in power and despite that in hindsight most people would agree despite him being a brutal dictator, which we put in power initially by the way, he was better than the alternative. HW realized this after the first gulf war and why he didn't take him out. He was left there as he gassed the kurds and did the usual despot shyt.

Also like i said in my edit. At least Nap is honest about what drives these actions. He is right that these actions are not altruistic. Before Obama left office we supportee the Saudis bombing the shyt out of Yemen and leading to the current humanitarian crisis and it continues under trump. So like i said, until you consistent you have no leg to stand on as far as trying to shame me in thinking the US should continues its interventionist policies.

If you think we should invade Syria then based on the same logic you would have been an Iraq War backer. It was done under the same pretenses.
 
Last edited:

Arithmetic

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Mar 6, 2015
Messages
49,570
Reputation
14,552
Daps
262,972
full






:damnanimated:
 
Last edited:

CrimsonTider

Seduce & Scheme
WOAT
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
82,190
Reputation
-13,964
Daps
130,248
I think he will breeze through the primaries and win presidency again honestly. I'm not seeing anything with these investigations and charges to make me they have anything serious on him, despite my hopes. The FBI is very, very, very conservative. I also think if these investigations end and don't knock him out of office it will give him so much momentum he will be unstoppable. Also, understand no matter how much some republicans say they hate him they will never hate him more than they hate democrats. This is a red country, no matter how much we hope it's not.

you sound like a crazy person
 

Brehcepticon

Adeptus Brehstartes
Supporter
Joined
Aug 6, 2017
Messages
8,618
Reputation
6,771
Daps
43,268
Man, Agent Orange has probably colluded with the Russians to take the election, has all but admitted to obstructing justice, paid off a pornstar to keep quiet about the affair, and he still has support of half the country. This shyt is brazy, brehs.

lDTJXXd.gif
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
307,026
Reputation
-34,302
Daps
617,290
Reppin
The Deep State




:damnanimated:



:ALERTRED:​




MUELLER RUNNING DOWN ON nikkaS!!!

BLOCK RULES!!!!!









Witness in Mueller Inquiry Who Advises U.A.E. Ruler Also Has Ties to Russia
Image
merlin_136393578_b7f73273-afd4-43dc-84c0-016f41743473-articleLarge.jpg

An adviser to the leader of the United Arab Emirates, George Nader, who is cooperating in the special counsel investigation, also has previously undisclosed links to Russia.CreditRon Sachs/Picture-Alliance, via Associated Press


By Mark Mazzetti, David D. Kirkpatrick, Ben Protess and Sharon LaFraniere

April 4, 2018
WASHINGTON — A witness who is cooperating in the special counsel investigation, George Nader, has connections to both the Persian Gulf states and Russia and may have information that links two important strands of the inquiry together, interviews and records show.

Mr. Nader’s ties to the United Arab Emirates are well documented — he is an adviser to its leader — but the extent of his links to Russia have not been previously disclosed.

Mr. Nader, a Lebanese-American businessman, has a catalog of international connections that paved the way for numerous meetings with White House officials that have drawn the attention of the special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III. For example, Mr. Nader used his longstanding ties to Kirill Dmitriev, the manager of a state-run Russian investment fund, to help set up a meeting in the Seychelles between Mr. Dmitriev and a Trump adviser days before Donald J. Trump took office.

Separately, investigators have asked witnesses about a meeting Mr. Nader attended in 2017 with a New York hedge fund manager, where he was joined by Jared Kushner and Stephen K. Bannon, who at the time were both senior advisers to Mr. Trump.

The investigative trail even led Mr. Mueller’s team to stop an Australian entrepreneur with ties to the U.A.E. after he landed at a Washington-area airport, according to people briefed on the matter. The investigators questioned the entrepreneur about Mr. Nader, including Mr. Nader’s relationship with Russia and his contacts with Mr. Trump’s advisers, as well as the movement of money from the U.A.E. into the United States.

Mr. Nader has received at least partial immunity for his cooperation, and it appears unlikely that Mr. Mueller is trying to build a case against him. Instead, it is common for prosecutors to interview as many people as possible to corroborate the testimony of a key witness like Mr. Nader.

Mr. Nader’s dealings with Russia date at least to 2012, when he helped broker a controversial $4.2 billion deal for the government of Iraq to buy Russian weapons. At the time, he was an informal adviser to Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki of Iraq, and he accompanied Mr. Maliki to Moscow in September 2012 to sign the arms deal at a meeting with President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia.

The deal was canceled shortly after because of concerns about corruption, and a spokesman for the prime minister said it would be renegotiated.

Earlier that year, Mr. Nader also attended the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum, an invitation-only conference organized by senior officials close to Mr. Putin that Russia presents as its answer to the World Economic Forum held annually in Davos, Switzerland. Mr. Nader is on a list of participants from 2012. Representatives of the St. Petersburg forum did not respond to inquiries about his attendance in subsequent years.


Since then, according to people familiar with his travels, Mr. Nader has returned frequently to Russia on behalf of the Emirati government. He even had his picture taken with Mr. Putin, according to one person who has seen the photograph, although it is unclear when the picture was taken.

Crown Prince Mohammed bin Zayed Al-Nahyan of Abu Dhabi, the de facto ruler of the U.A.E., is a close ally of the United States and a frequent visitor to the White House. He has also visited Moscow and met with Mr. Putin several times in recent years. One person briefed on the matter said Mr. Nader had accompanied the crown prince to Moscow on numerous occasions.

ADVERTISEMENT

Last year, days before Mr. Trump took office, Mr. Nader helped set up a meeting at a Seychelles resort between Mr. Dmitriev, Emirati officials and Erik Prince, the former head of Blackwater Worldwide and an adviser to Mr. Trump’s transition team. The meeting, at the bar of a Four Seasons Hotel overlooking the Indian Ocean, was brokered in part to explore the possibility of a back channel for discussions between the Trump administration and the Kremlin, according to people familiar with the meeting.

Image
05dc-inquiry2-articleLarge.jpg

Kirill Dmitriev, the manager of a state-run Russian investment fund, met with Mr. Nader and an adviser to the Trump campaign days before Donald J. Trump took office.CreditRamil Sitdikov/Sputnik, via Associated Press
Such contacts are at the heart of Mr. Mueller’s investigation, and his investigators have repeatedly used aggressive tactics to press witnesses. About four weeks ago, F.B.I. agents working with Mr. Mueller’s team stopped a Russian oligarch at a New York-area airport, questioned him about his dealings with Mr. Trump and seized his electronics, according to a person familiar with the matter, which was first reported by CNN.

Mr. Mueller’s investigators have asked multiple witnesses about the Seychelles meeting, part of a broader line of inquiry surrounding contacts between Emirati advisers and Trump administration officials. They have also pressed for details about a meeting Mr. Nader attended in New York in early 2017 with Mr. Kushner and Mr. Bannon with the hedge fund manager Richard Gerson, a friend of Mr. Kushner’s and the founder of Falcon Edge Capital.

Mr. Mueller’s particular interest in that meeting is unclear, although Mr. Gerson has had business dealings with the court of the U.A.E.’s Prince Mohammed. Mr. Gerson has developed relations with several senior Emirati officials over the years, including with Prince Mohammed himself, and he has often sought investments from Emirati state funds.

Mr. Gerson’s family also has business and philanthropic ties to the Kushners. Mr. Kushner has been friends for more than a decade with Mr. Gerson’s brother Mark, a founder of the specialized research company Gerson Lehrman Group. Mark Gerson was also an early investor in Cadre, a real estate technology company founded by Mr. Kushner and his brother, Josh.

ADVERTISEMENT

Jared Kushner’s family foundation has also donated tens of thousands of dollars to an Israeli medical aid group led by Mark Gerson.

A lawyer for Mr. Nader and a spokesman for Rick Gerson declined to comment. Mark Gerson did not reply to requests for comment.

Mr. Mueller’s investigators have also questioned Joel Zamel, an Australian entrepreneur who has an office in Tel Aviv and knows Mr. Nader, according to people briefed on the matter. Mr. Zamel has had contacts with senior U.A.E. officials close to its ruler since at least 2014.

In February, federal agents working for Mr. Mueller stopped Mr. Zamel at Reagan National Airport outside Washington and briefly seized his electronic devices, the people said. Mr. Zamel later appeared before a grand jury and was questioned about Mr. Nader, though it was unclear whether Mr. Zamel had any information about Mr. Nader’s ties to Russia.

ADVERTISEMENT

Mr. Zamel is a witness in Mr. Mueller’s investigation and is not suspected of any wrongdoing, according to Marc Mukasey, a lawyer for Mr. Zamel and his crowdsourced consulting firm, Wikistrat. The Wall Street Journal reported on Monday that Mr. Zamel informally met with Mr. Mueller’s team.

“Joel and Wikistrat have not been accused of anything, have done nothing wrong and are not the focus of the special counsel,” said Mr. Mukasey, a global chairman of Greenberg Traurig’s white-collar defense and special investigations practice. “Prosecutors like to question as many people as they can — even if they have tangential involvement and limited knowledge.”

Mr. Zamel briefly met last spring with Jared Kushner at the White House, another person said, though that meeting does not appear to be a focus of Mr. Mueller’s inquiry.


Wikistrat, which pays security experts around the world for their insights, has landed several government contracts, according to databases and news reports. Its website says the firm can draw from a group of more than 2,200 analysts worldwide who share their thinking on an interactive platform.

Some well-known experts serve on Wikistrat’s advisory council, including Michael V. Hayden, a former head of the C.I.A. and the National Security Agency, and Dennis Ross, a former United States diplomat with deep expertise in the Middle East.

Correction: April 4, 2018
An earlier version of this article misstated the value of a deal George Nader helped broker in 2012 for the government of Iraq. It was $4.2 billion, not $4.2 million
 

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
88,138
Reputation
3,616
Daps
157,146
Reppin
Brooklyn
Saddam also used chemical weapons after the first gulf war and we left him in power and despite that in hindsight most people would agree despite him being a brutal dictator, which we put in power initially by the way, he was better than the alternative. HW realized this after the first gulf war and why he didn't take him out. He was left there as he gassed the kurds and did the usual despot shyt.

Also like i said in my edit. At least Nap is honest about what drives these actions. He is right that these actions are not altruistic. Before Obama left office we supportee the Saudis bombing the shyt out of Yemen and leading to the current humanitarian crisis and it continues under trump. So like i said, until you consistent you have no leg to stand on as far as trying to shame me in thinking the US should continues its interventionist policies.

If you think we should invade Syria then based on the same logic you would have been an Iraq War backer. It was done under the same pretenses.
giphy.gif
 
Top