Great read, Thanks. My only issue with this is when she spoke about the data being 'stolen':
But we know that the data wasn't stolen, it was freely available (which oddly makes it worse (IMO) than being stolen).....
Why that date in particular a month from now?
Great read, Thanks. My only issue with this is when she spoke about the data being 'stolen':
But we know that the data wasn't stolen, it was freely available (which oddly makes it worse (IMO) than being stolen).....
That's exactly how I'm seeing it.My understanding of this was that the data wasn’t either wholly “stolen” nor “freely available”, but rather specific permissions were given to Kogen for academic research, and he then went way past what his permissions were supposed to allow, and when Facebook found out they did nothing to stop or reverse this — allegedly even going on to co-opting the use of the data.
Is that how y’all are seeing this or am I off base here?
information tech antitrust work gets my dikk hard
like when you tryna smash the fine stripper but she talmbout $500 and the other one w the c section scar only asking $150
This is a pretty good thread laid out in laymen's terms of why the facebook and CA news is important
They continually use the language "votes changed" but what about dropped votes or people who couldn't cast a vote? That is why I know their "investigation" is not thorough.Russia definitely hacked the votes, I don't think anything can be said to convince me otherwise. All the polls, the early voting, exit polls had Hillary winning and around 7 o clock that night everything took a 180 degree turn.
@kylegriffin1
WSJ appears to have the contents of the polygraph test Stormy Daniels took in 2011. "CONCLUSION: In the opinion of this examiner Ms. Clifford is truthful about having unprotected vaginal intercourse with Donald Trump in July 2006." http://on.wsj.com/2Gba7PA
1:20 PM - Mar 20, 2018