How do they even attempt to explain those pictures? Doctored? Out of context? What possible context could there be besides torture, spousal abuse, or interrogation for that deep, dark bruise under her eye?
I want a reporter to ask him how given the evidence against these people he still believes in their innocence, while he still says the Central Park 5 are guilty even though they were deemed innocent years later.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.