RUSSIA/РОССИЯ THREAD—ASSANGE CHRGD W/ SPYING—DJT IMPEACHED TWICE-US TREASURY SANCTS KILIMNIK AS RUSSIAN AGNT

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
305,928
Reputation
-34,259
Daps
616,271
Reppin
The Deep State
4d, Ya boy ishkoff says Trump's lawyers knew about Jr's- never mind you'll post it.
yURlGZs.gif


Eoj8XdU.gif






Sources: Trump lawyers knew of Russia emails back in June

Michael IsikoffJuly 14, 2017

9d845b41d1d2f956abbfc66937c427ff

President Donald Trump and son Donald Trump Jr. (Photo illustration: Yahoo News; photos: Alex Brandon/AP, Matt York/AP)

President Trump’s legal team was informed more than three weeks ago about the email chain showing that his son Donald Jr. met with a Kremlin-connected lawyer last June, two sources familiar with the handling of the matter told Yahoo News. :gucci:


Trump told Reuters in an interview on Wednesday that he learned just “a couple of days ago” that his son, Donald Trump Jr, had met with the Russian lawyer, Natalia Veselnitskaya, after receiving emails that she would supply him with information that “would incriminate Hillary” and was “part of Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump.” That was the day after Donald Jr. released the email exchanges himself, after learning they would be published by the New York Times.

Trump repeated that assertion in a talk with reporters Air Force One on his way to Paris Wednesday night. “I only heard about it two or three days ago,” he said according to a transcript of his talk when asked about the meeting with Veselnitskaya at Trump Tower in June 2016 attended by Donald Trump Jr., Paul Manafort, then Trump’s campaign chief, and Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner.

But the sources told Yahoo News that Marc Kasowitz, the president’s chief lawyer in the Russia investigation, and Alan Garten, executive vice president and chief legal officer of the Trump Organization, were both informed about the emails in the third week of June, after they were discovered by lawyers for Kushner, who is now a senior White House official.

On June 8, 2016, Trump Jr. had forwarded an email to Kushner and Manafort about the upcoming meeting with the subject line: “FW: Russia-Clinton-private & confidential.”

The discovery of the emails prompted Kushner to amend his security clearance form to reflect the meeting, which he had failed to report when he originally sought clearance for his White House job. That revision — his second — to the so-called SF-86, was done on June 21. Kushner made the change even though there were questions among his lawyers whether the meeting had to be reported, given that there was no clear evidence that Veselntiskya was a government official. The change to the security form prompted the FBI to question Kushner on June 23, the second time he was interviewed by agents about his security clearance, the sources said.

But the information that Trump’s lawyers were told about the emails in June raises questions about why they would not have immediately informed the president. Trump’s campaign is under investigation by Special Counsel Robert Mueller into possible collusion with Russian government officials. The emails appear to be the first hard evidence of contacts between top campaign officials and someone connected to the Kremlin.

A spokesman for Kasowitz declined to comment, saying the matter involved “privileged information.” Garten did not respond to an email request for comment.

Pushing back the discovery of the emails to June 21 also raises additional questions about the initial public statements made by the White House after the existence of the meeting was first reported by the New York Times on July 8. At that time, Trump, Jr. issued a public statement describing the session as a “short introductory meeting” in which the primary topic of discussion was “the adoption of Russian children” by American families.” The actual purpose of the meeting, to obtain damaging information about Hillary Clinton ostensibly collected by the Russian government, wasn’t mentioned in Trump’s initial statement.

The next day, Reince Priebus, the White House chief of staff, said in an interview that the meeting was a “big nothing burger.”

The president himself repeatedly described the Russia investigation as “fake news” and ridiculed television networks’ reports about it. “With four months looking at Russia…under a magnifying glass, they have ‘zero tapes’ of T people colluding. There is no collusion & no obstruction. I should be given an apology!” the president wrote in two tweets on June 26.

The real story is that President Obama did NOTHING after being informed in August about Russian meddling. With 4 months looking at Russia…

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) June 26, 2017



..under a magnifying glass, they have zero "tapes" of T people colluding. There is no collusion & no obstruction. I should be given apology!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) June 26, 2017



Aside from questions about the credibility of White House statements, the disclosure of the emails potentially has raised new questions about Kushner’s security clearance. He initially filed his SF-86 on Jan. 18, leaving out any mention of meetings with foreign government officials during the transition and the campaign. His lawyers have said this was inadvertent and that a member of his staff had prematurely hit the “send” button for the firm before it was completed. Within twelve hours, they have said, Kushner notified the FBI that he would make amendments and disclose his meetings with foreign officials.

This was followed by a revised security clearance submission on May 11 in which Kushner reported more than 100 meetings with officials from over 20 countries, including a meeting with the Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak and another with Sergey Gorkov, the head of Russian state-owned bank.

The revised security clearance led to Kushner’s first FBI interview about the matter in mid-May, the sources said. The bureau is now reviewing Kushner’s second amended form following the new disclosure about his meeting with the Russian lawyer. His lawyers are confident that it won’t raise any additional problems since, as they have asserted, Kushner had forgotten the meeting — he was only briefly present — and had no intent to conceal it. In the meantime, he has an interim security clearance.

@DonKnock @SJUGrad13 @88m3 @Cali_livin @Menelik II @wire28 @smitty22 @Reality @fact @Hood Critic @ExodusNirvana @Blessed Is the Man @THE MACHINE @OneManGang @duckbutta @TheDarceKnight @dtownreppin214 @The Taxman @JKFrazier @tmonster
 
Last edited:

Berniewood Hogan

IT'S BERNIE SANDERS WITH A STEEL CHAIR!
Joined
Aug 1, 2012
Messages
17,983
Reputation
6,869
Daps
88,323
Reppin
nWg
It is, their fault.

See, y'all keep wanna play this purity bullshyt.

Well this is what you get.

All of nothing, instead of some of something.

If you refuse to engage, you will be engaged by other means.
:what:young ppl didnt let the districts get gerrymandered or let the dnc get hacked, you ham and egger
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
305,928
Reputation
-34,259
Daps
616,271
Reppin
The Deep State
CZsxsAa.gif


NIUImVb.gif


NOW WE'RE COOKING!!!

MORE REPUBLICANS GETTING DRAGGED IN!!!



Trump Jr. pitch was part of broad Russian effort
Two months before Donald Trump Jr.’s encounter with a Russian figure, a key House subcommittee chairman received a similar overture in Moscow offering derogatory information about a U.S. policy that was upsetting Vladimir Putin.

Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, a California Republican with a reputation as a Moscow ally in Congress, told The Hill the information he received in April 2016 came from the chief prosecutor in Moscow and painted an alternative picture of the Russian fraud case that led to the passage of anti-Russia legislation in Congress known as the Magnitsky Act.

“I had a meeting with some people, government officials, and they were saying, ‘Would you be willing to accept material on the Magnitsky case from the prosecutors in Moscow? ‘And I said, ‘Sure, I’d be willing to look at it,’” Rohrabacher recalled in an interview.


The congressman’s account provides the latest evidence that the overture to President Trump’s eldest son in June 2016 by a Russian lawyer named Natalia Veselnitskaya was part of a larger campaign by Moscow that predated the Trump Tower encounter and continued afterwards.

The focus was to sow distrust among American leaders about the Magnitsky Act, and influence far more than Trump’s inner circle. It included lobbying overtures to journalists, State Department officials and lawmakers and congressional staff from both parties, according to interviews with participants and recipients of the campaign.

Congress passed the law and President Barack Obama signed it in 2012, punishing Russia with sanctions for alleged human rights violations in connection with the prison death of a lawyer named Sergei Magnitsky who claimed to have uncovered a massive money laundering scheme based in Moscow.

U.S. officials argued the fraud was perpetrated by Russian government leaders and hurt American companies. But Russians have countered the fraud was actually committed by Magnitsky and his clients. Prosecutors in Russia eventually won a posthumous conviction against the dead lawyer, and retaliated against the U.S. for passing the law by suspending Americans’ ability to adopt Russian children.

Rohrabacher’s account mirrors several aspects of Donald Trump Jr., who said he accepted the June 9, 2016 meeting with Veselnitskaya because he thought he was getting political dirt on his father’s Democratic opponent Hillary Clinton from a prosecutor in Moscow.

But when the dirt was delivered it was about the Magnitsky law and the adoption dispute, not Clinton, the Trump son said.

The congressman, who chairs the House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on Europe, Eurasia and Emerging threats and is openly friendly with Russia, said he was on an official congressional fact-finding trip to Moscow when he was told to expect the delivery of derogatory information important to America and that the source was going to be the chief prosecutor in Moscow.

Rohrabacher said he received a package of documents as he was ending a meeting in the Russian legislative body known as the Duma.

“At the end of the meeting simply as I was walking out, they said this gentleman has some documents for you. And he handed them to me. And that was as far as my meeting with the prosecutors went,” he said. “We got the information, we looked at it and we asked various people about the issue.”


Rohrabacher, a former Ronald Reagan speechwriter who has held his seat in Orange County since 1988, said he shared the derogatory information with members of the Foreign Affairs Committee and the U.S. Treasury Department.

He said he believed both he and Trump’s son did the right thing by accepting the meetings and the Russian information,

“I always had a policy that we should listen to everybody who wants to talk to you, especially if they think they have something that is important and determine if it is important and if it is, to follow up on it,” the 70-year-old lawmaker said.

“I think it would be a dereliction of duty not to give it an honest look,” he added. “And for anybody on Trump’s team to turn it down, and wouldn’t even look at information provided them that they said would be important for our country. That would have been the wrong thing to do. It was the right thing for him (Trump Jr.) to see if there was some important information.”

Rohrabacher’s arguments echo those of the Trump administration, but contrast with officials from Democratic and Republican campaigns who have said it would be very unusual for a U.S. campaign to accept the meeting proposed to Trump Jr.

When Rohrabacher got back to Washington from his official trip from Moscow, he circulated to fellow lawmakers a memo summarizing what the Russians provided, much of it suggesting U.S. officials had the wrong theory about the Magnitsky case.

“There is not a jot of truth” to the Magnitsky story circulating in America, the Russian document argued, and the 2012 passage of the law “caused the most severe damage to the US-Russian relations in recent years.”

“Changing attitudes to the Magnitsky story in the Congress, obtaining reliable knowledge about real events and personal motives of those behind the lobbying of this destructive Act, taking into account the pre-election political situation may change the current climate in the interstate relations,” the document added. “Such a situation could have a very favorable response from the Russian side.”

Rohrabacher said the document changed some of his perceptions of the Magnitsky Act, opening his mind to the possibility that Russians were victims instead of perpetrators in the whole case.

“I have not decided whether or not the Magnitsky Act itself is wrong,” he said. “After looking at all the evidence I think there are two sides to the argument as to whether or not the Russian officials involved with the Magnitsky case were the villains or the victims. I think that could be decided either way.”

The Magnitsky Act had broad support in Congress. Paired with legislation granting Russia and Moldova most favored nation trade status, it was approved in the Senate by a vote of 92-4. The House vote was 365-43. Rohrabacher voted in favor of it.

Rohrabacher did take one action favorable to Russia after the trip, proposing an amendment to 2016 global human rights legislation working its way through Congress that would strip Magnitsky’s name from the bill.

Rohrabacher said he took that action not because he was picking sides in the Russia matter but rather because the legislation was designed to be far larger than Russia and using the Russian lawyer’s name sent the wrong signal that the bill was more narrowly focused on Moscow.

In the end, he recalled several instances in 2016 in which he was lobbied by Russian figures or their American counterparts on Magnitsky, including once in Berlin by a Russian-American businessman and another time at a dinner in Washington that Veselnetskaya attended.

The former Democratic congressman Ron Dellums also pitched him on the subject last year, and Rohrabacher believes other lawmakers got similar pitches.

“They (the Russians) are going to want to have their say if they can find anyone who will listen,” he said.









zSbrQiA.gif



@DonKnock @SJUGrad13 @88m3 @Cali_livin @Menelik II @wire28 @smitty22 @Reality @fact @Hood Critic @ExodusNirvana @Blessed Is the Man @THE MACHINE @OneManGang @duckbutta @TheDarceKnight @dtownreppin214 @The Taxman @JKFrazier @tmonster
 

MalikX

Superstar
Joined
Dec 24, 2015
Messages
7,554
Reputation
1,910
Daps
39,316
Reppin
Worldwide Entertainment
:dead: at these fukkboys now saying collusion is not a crime

fukk, I hate these cacs

How you go from saying there's no collusion to there's no evidence to prove anything to it happened but, it's not a crime

Like homegirl said, let's say if North Korea or Syria or Iran worked with a candidate to sway an election, are these fukkboys still saying that's okay?
 

MalikX

Superstar
Joined
Dec 24, 2015
Messages
7,554
Reputation
1,910
Daps
39,316
Reppin
Worldwide Entertainment
:dead:

Its like Deniro and Pesci in casino.



All the GOP wants to do is run a Casino and quietly skim off the top, but they are stuck with Trump who is bringing heat.


Them nikkas was just trying to do business as usual, skim money off Wall Street, Big Pharma, Defense Contractors, the occasional oil sheikh or third world dictator but, Cheeto came in and brought the fukking Feds to their doorstep :dead:
 
Top