RUSSIA/РОССИЯ THREAD—ASSANGE CHRGD W/ SPYING—DJT IMPEACHED TWICE-US TREASURY SANCTS KILIMNIK AS RUSSIAN AGNT

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
305,660
Reputation
-34,224
Daps
615,828
Reppin
The Deep State
AY21oCv.gif


Exclusive: U.S. investigators in Russia probe look at role of Flynn partner

Exclusive - U.S. investigators in Russia probe look at role of Flynn partner
Tue Jun 20, 2017 | 9:22 AM EDT

By Nathan Layne and Julia Edwards Ainsley | NEW YORK

Federal investigators probing the lobbying work of ousted national security adviser Michael Flynn are focused in part on the role of Bijan Kian, Flynn’s former business partner, according to a person interviewed by the FBI.

Investigators are also looking at whether payments from foreign clients to Flynn and his company, the now-inactive Flynn Intel Group, were lawful, according to two separate sources with knowledge of the broad inquiry into Flynn's business activities. That includes payments by three Russian companies and a Netherlands-based company, Inovo, controlled by Turkish businessman Ekim Alptekin, they said.

The FBI's interest in Kian has not been previously reported. Kian played a central role in securing and overseeing the Inovo contract, two people with knowledge of that project said.

It is not clear whether Kian is a target of the criminal investigation or whether investigators are trying to build a fuller understanding of how Flynn's company operated.

A person recently interviewed by the FBI in connection with the Flynn investigation said agents from the bureau's criminal division had asked as much about Kian and his work on the project with Alptekin as they had about Flynn.

Kian did not respond to repeated requests for comment, nor did the lawyer he recently hired, Robert Trout. The FBI declined to comment.

Flynn's lawyer, Robert Kelner, did not respond to requests for comment. Alptekin declined to comment for this story but last month told Reuters that he was satisfied with the work done by Flynn Intel Group and denied any wrongdoing.

The FBI has been investigating whether Flynn's consulting firm lobbied on behalf of Turkey - after being paid $530,000 by Inovo - without making the proper disclosure, Reuters reported earlier this month.

The federal investigation is being run by special counsel Robert Mueller. Mueller has a mandate to investigate contacts between Russia and Trump's 2016 election campaign team and any related matters. Flynn was fired by the Trump administration in February after officials said he mischaracterized a series of phone calls with Russia’s ambassador last December.

The top Democrat on the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, which has separately been looking into whether Flynn made false statements in applying for security clearance, said he was also scrutinizing Kian.

"I have an interest in Bijan Kian and his interactions with General Flynn based on specific documents already obtained by the Committee,” Elijah Cummings told Reuters in an email.

Kelner has sought immunity for Flynn in exchange for his testimony, saying his client "certainly has a story to tell."

FAILED COUP OPENS A DOOR

In private conversations with potential clients, Kian portrayed himself as a rainmaker for Flynn, tapping into connections cultivated during a five-year tenure as a director at the U.S. Export-Import Bank, according to one person who worked with the firm.

Alptekin told Reuters in May that his firm hired Flynn Intel Group to research Gulen's activities in the United States, which he suspected were "poisoning" relations between the United States and Turkey. Like Turkey President Tayyip Erdogan, Alptekin blamed the coup on followers of Gulen.

Gulen has denied any role in the coup and dismisses Turkey’s allegations that he heads a terrorist organization.

Kian oversaw key elements of the project that emerged, including a still-unfinished documentary on Gulen, according to two people involved in the project.

Inovo paid Flynn Intel Group a total of $530,000, starting in September, according to a Justice Department filing by the company in March. Flynn Intel Group paid $80,000 to Inovo in "consultancy fees," according to the filing, which does not provide more detail on why payments were made in both directions.

On Sept. 19, Kian and Flynn met in New York with Turkey's foreign minister and energy minister, who is Erdogan's son-in-law, according to a person with knowledge of the meeting.

In late October Kian invited staff of the House Homeland Security Committee to Flynn Intel Group's headquarters in Virginia. The meeting was called to show off new mobile phone security technology, but Kian also used the opportunity to try to get a congressional hearing on Gulen, according to a person at the meeting.

At that point, the Flynn Intel Group had only disclosed its work for Alptekin's Inovo in a filing with Congress. It had not mentioned Inovo’s ties to Turkey.

When Justice Department officials became aware months later that Kian and other Flynn Intel Group officials had met with Turkish officials they insisted on a fuller disclosure, people involved in those discussions said.

The Flynn Intel Group made the more detailed disclosure in its March filing with the Justice Department under the Foreign Agents Registration Act that said the work that Flynn and Kian did for Inovo “could be construed to have principally benefited the Republic of Turkey.”

(Reporting by Nathan Layne; Additional reporting by John Walcott, Julia Harte and Jonathan Landay in Washington; Editing by Kevin Krolicki and Ross Colvin)

@DonKnock @The Black Panther @SJUGrad13 @88m3@Cali_livin @Menelik II @Hogan in the Wolfpac @wire28 @smitty22 @Reality @fact @Hood Critic @ExodusNirvana @Call Me James @Blessed Is the Man @THE MACHINE @OneManGang @duckbutta @TheDarceKnight @Ed MOTHERfukkING G @dtownreppin214 @The Taxman
 

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
87,479
Reputation
3,571
Daps
155,384
Reppin
Brooklyn

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
305,660
Reputation
-34,224
Daps
615,828
Reppin
The Deep State
RUSSIAN SANCTIONS GALORE!!!!



US oil groups feel Russia sanctions freeze more than Europeans
Rivals gain ground with less aggressive EU stance
11 minutes ago
© FT montage / Getty
Russian President Vladimir Putin this month made an emotional tribute to Christophe de Margerie, the former boss of France’s Total who was killed in an accident in 2014.

At the launch of a new gas tanker named after Mr de Margerie, Mr Putin declared him a “great friend of our country”, a sentiment that extends to many executives at Total’s European oil and gas peers.

While US energy groups stepped back from Russia in response to a sanctions regime that Washington lawmakers moved to tighten this month, rivals in the EU have held fast, ducking through loopholes in Brussels’ restrictions to keep joint ventures running.

Elizabeth Rosenberg, a sanctions expert formerly at the US Treasury and now with the Center for a New American Security, points to the “regulatory arbitrage” between the EU and US sanctions. “US firms see an uneven playing field,” says Ms Rosenberg.

Since the collapse of the Soviet Union, Russia has been a glittering prize for foreign oil companies. With proved reserves of 110bn barrels of oil and 32tn cubic metres of gas, according to BP, it is one of the world’s largest holders of economically producible hydrocarbons.

Sanctions slapped on Moscow in 2014 by the US, EU and other countries in response to Russia’s invasion of Crimea were aimed at cutting off the development of its new oil frontiers from western help.

In practice, however, not all sanctions have proven equal. ExxonMobil of the US reacted sharply by freezing capital and suspending projects, a position expected to become entrenched if new legislation that tightens restrictions further is written into law.

But the sanctions imposed by the EU have had a less decisive impact, in part owing to less stringent and less aggressive regulators in Brussels compared to Washington, according to trade experts.

Rainer Seele, chief executive of OMV, the Austrian oil and gas company, told the FT that sanctions had had little impact on its business in Russia. “We have made millions of legal checks, and the message is clear we are in full compliance with the sanctions,” he says.

Lawyers say US companies are more circumspect due to the strict approach of the Office of Foreign Assets Control (Ofac), the body with the job of monitoring sanctions adherence, which is seen as more effective in ensuring compliance than its EU counterpart.

“Ofac is a much-feared, powerful and active agency . . . When it penalises breaches, it is swift, effective and painful and it makes it very public,” says Robert Volterra, partner at law firm Volterra Fietta. “Observers calculate that it is better to err on the side of caution.”

In Europe, by contrast, implementation is left to individual countries, offering possible loopholes not available in the US. “It is not a robust enforcement system,” says Mr Volterra. “EU companies think, probably correctly, that they have greater latitude under EU sanctions.”

European rules, for example, offer a “grandfathering” provision, so that projects that were under way before the sanctions can continue. Italy’s Eni and Rosneft, the state-controlled oil group, are preparing to start drilling a well in the eastern Black Sea, for example, making further progress with a joint venture set up in 2013.

Exxon has a joint venture with Rosneft in the same region, but has not been allowed to start drilling. After reports in April that the company was seeking a waiver from the Trump administration, Treasury secretary Steven Mnuchin issued a statement that the department “will not be issuing waivers to US companies, including Exxon, authorising drilling prohibited by current Russian sanctions”.

This month, chief executives at Total, BP, Royal Dutch Shell and ExxonMobil took part in the St Petersburg International Economic Forum hosted by Mr Putin. But while many European companies announced new deals or progress on existing projects in Russia, Exxon had nothing to show for the visit.

The lack of progress marks a sharp reversal of Exxon’s fortunes in Russia. The US oil company had signed a lucrative series of deals between 2011 and 2013 with Rosneft on a range of projects in the Arctic, the Black Sea and shale formations in western Siberia.

Those plans were blocked by sanctions and, in 2014, Exxon was forced to wind down its joint ventures with Rosneft at a cost of about $1bn.

In stark contrast, European rivals continue to develop new projects. Total has not had to pull out of the $27bn Yamal LNG liquefied natural gas plant. Gas projects were excluded from the sanctions — in part because of the EU’s reliance on imports of Russian gas.

“I think that our job is to demonstrate, as we have done, that despite sanctions we are able to build these gigantic projects such as Yamal LNG, putting in place the financing,” Total chief executive Patrick Pouyanne told Tass, Russia’s state-run news agency this month.

Royal Dutch Shell is also discussing new gas developments in Russia, including an expansion of Sakhalin 2, an LNG plant in the country’s far east. At the St Petersburg forum, Britain’s BP announced “an agreement on strategic co-operation in gas” with Rosneft, including plans to sell more Russian gas to European markets.

Even oil projects backed by European groups are also being waved through. Spain’s Repsol last month applied for permission from Russian authorities to partner with Gazprom Neft, Gazprom’s oil subsidiary, on a Siberian oil project.

Alvaro Nadal, Spain’s minister for energy and tourism, said on a recent visit to Moscow: “The sanctions have a limited field of action, and therefore there is room for co-operation.”

As well as taking a more relaxed attitude to implementing sanctions, some EU members have been vocal in opposition such as Italy, Greece and Hungary.

The proposed tightening of US sanctions backed by the Senate last week could hit some European companies by targeting those involved in Russian oil and gas pipelines. This sparked a backlash from Germany and other EU states, which have accused Washington of “illegal extraterritorial” threats.

But the proposals would also make the competitive disadvantage faced by Exxon in Russia even harder to lift.

“It is very difficult for [US] oil companies to be publicly arguing the case against the sanctions,” Ms Rosenberg says. ”It’s a really tough sell for them to say that to politicians and the public. So they are stuck with an uneven playing field.”

Additional reporting by Ralph Atkins

Novatek of Russia, France’s Total, China National Petroleum Corporation and China’s Silk Road Fund, will ship its first gas by the end of the year. The consortium announced last week that the German and Swedish export credit agencies had signed a deal to provide financing.

Other Arctic projects, such as Rosneft’s oil drilling tie-up with ExxonMobil, were frozen after western partners withdrew to stay within the law. In some cases, the Russian company has chosen to continue alone. Yamal’s owner Novatek is covered by sanctions, cutting off its access to foreign financing.

That forced Russia’s second largest gas producer to look east to Chinese funds for the bulk of the project’s $19bn external capital requirements. Chinese shareholders own 30 per cent of the project.

The loopholes in the sanctions granted to gas projects have allowed Total to continue to work alongside Novatek as a 20 per cent shareholder in Yamal.

Scheduled to start pumping gas up through the ice this winter, Total expects Yamal to produce 16.5m tons of LNG each year. With all of that already sold on decades-long contracts, it appears a healthy reward for persistence.
 

fact

Fukk you thought it was?
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
14,539
Reputation
6,014
Daps
58,941
Reppin
How you gonna ROFL with a hollow back?
MORE SANCTIONS!!!



We can avoid all this bullsh1t with a statement from Trump/Tillerson calling this fukk out for his bullsh1t antics "smarten up, Vlad, we know what you did, stop it" instead we get these fukk bois talking about "you think America is so great" "Germany is awful" etc..
be a nationalist for other nations, breh
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
305,660
Reputation
-34,224
Daps
615,828
Reppin
The Deep State
We can avoid all this bullsh1t with a statement from Trump/Tillerson calling this fukk out for his bullsh1t antics "smarten up, Vlad, we know what you did, stop it" instead we get these fukk bois talking about "you think America is so great" "Germany is awful" etc..
be a nationalist for other nations, breh
bruh, its SO EASY to do.

They're not even trying to pretend to be interested in distancing themselves from that shyt
 

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
87,479
Reputation
3,571
Daps
155,384
Reppin
Brooklyn
The Hill
37 mins ·
China's government has extended a personal invitation to President Trump’s daughter Ivanka and his son-in-law Jared Kushner to visit Beijing, according to a new report.


China invited Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner to Beijing: report
Trump's newly appointed ambassador to China Terry Branstad is expected to start next week.
THEHILL.COM




China also recently arrested the head of the Insurance giant Anbang which was supposedly in talks with Kushner for 666 Park Ave
 
Top