is that your way of saying there's no evidence?
It's a way of saying that ANYONE claiming certainty either way doesn't know what they're talking about.
You said "there's no evidence of collusion" repeatedly. You don't know what you're talking about.
If someone says there IS conclusive evidence of collusion, they don't know what they're talking about either.
Nobody will until the investigation is complete.
This is why you're a clown.